Jill Bearup
I learned about fallacies recently, and it’s nice to have a way to put a name to ways in which we don’t think or argue logically.
Follow up video: Chesterton’s Fence: https://youtu.be/VdYssekrFxo
Music: Adventures by A Himitsu
Website about fallacies: http://yourlogicalfallacyis.com
This was the course I took (it’s free): https://www.futurelearn.com/courses/logical-and-critical-thinking
Find me:
http://patreon.com/jillbearup
http://www.jillbearup.com
IN THIS VIDEO:
0:19 Fallacy of Composition
0:29 Fallacy of Division
0:39 The Gambler’s Fallacy
0:47 Tu Quoque (Who Are You To Talk?)
1:06 Strawman
1:19 Ad hominem
1:35 Genetic Fallacy
Correction: 1:43 Important clarification: fallacious appeal to authority is when you assume someone’s claims about [bacon] are valid in spite of the fact that they are in fact a [cheese] expert.
However, it is also a fallacy to assume that just because someone is an expert on [bacon] that they will always be factually accurate when talking about [bacon]especially if they do not provide evidence.
1:43 Fallacious Appeal To Authority
2:02 Red Herring
2:21 Appeal to Emotion
2:35 Appeal to Popularity (Bandwagon)
2:39 Appeal to Tradition
2:43 Appeal to Nature
2:51 Appeal to Ignorance
3:03 Begging the Question
3:19 Equivocation
3:37 False Dichotomy (Black or White)
3:47 Middle Ground Fallacy
3:56 Decision Point Fallacy (Sorites Paradox)
4:16 Slippery Slope Fallacy
4:33 Hasty Generalisations (Anecdotes)
4:52 Faulty Analogy
5:01 Burden of Proof
5:30 Affirming the Consequent
5:57 Denying the Antecedent
6:09 Moving the Goalposts
6:22 False Cause (and Texas Sharpshooter)
6:41 Loaded Question
6:48 No True Scotsman
6:57 Personal Incredulity
7:05 The Fallacy Fallacy
I trimmed the start of unnecessary fluff, and therefore: new timestamps!
0:19 Fallacy of Composition
0:29 Fallacy of Division
0:39 The Gambler's Fallacy
0:47 Tu Quoque (Who Are You To Talk?)
1:06 Strawman
1:19 Ad hominem
1:35 Genetic Fallacy
Correction: 1:43 Important clarification: fallacious appeal to authority is when you assume someone’s claims about [bacon] are valid in spite of the fact that they are in fact a [cheese] expert.
However, it is also a fallacy to assume that just because someone is an expert on [bacon] that they will always be factually accurate when talking about [bacon], especially if they do not provide evidence.
1:43 Fallacious Appeal To Authority
2:02 Red Herring
2:21 Appeal to Emotion
2:35 Appeal to Popularity (Bandwagon)
2:39 Appeal to Tradition
2:43 Appeal to Nature
2:51 Appeal to Ignorance
3:03 Begging the Question
3:19 Equivocation
3:37 False Dichotomy (Black or White)
3:47 Middle Ground Fallacy
3:56 Decision Point Fallacy (Sorites Paradox)
4:16 Slippery Slope Fallacy
4:33 Hasty Generalisations (Anecdotes)
4:52 Faulty Analogy
5:01 Burden of Proof
5:30 Affirming the Consequent
5:57 Denying the Antecedent
6:09 Moving the Goalposts
6:22 False Cause (and Texas Sharpshooter)
6:41 Loaded Question
6:48 No True Scotsman
6:57 Personal Incredulity
7:05 The Fallacy Fallacy
"Here, take this Belladonna, it is very natural" pffhajahahahahahaha
Where's Circular Reasoning?
If you like milk chocolate but not dark chocolate you actually like sugar more than chocolate
LOVED IT
I like your channel, you're really funny, though your example for a strawman was a little unfortunate. California is making all gas powered cars made past 2030 ineligible to be registered to drive, effectively banning them. Maybe that's a hasty generalization though since not the whole world or country is doing it, but still. That said, strawman arguments certainly exist and are terrible.
I love fallacies. Or, more accurately, I love finding, exploring, and tabulating them like this! I read my first logic book in high school, A Rulebook for Arguments, and I learned MUCH more about good argumentation from the Appendix on fallacies in the back than I did from the rest of the book or even my collegiate logic classes. This was a fun reminder of that, thanks Jill.
After all, you have to be able to spot a bad argument before you can make a good one yourself! Or, 'if you only read one newspaper, read the enemy's.' Or . . . something like that, anyway. 😁
Ad Hoc: am I invisible to you??
I took a Critical Thinking in Literature class followed by a Logical Writing class in college. Now, arguing with people is boring because I point out their fallacies and they storm away in frustration, usually with some choice words about my gender, my political affiliation, or menstruation. It's also harder to argue without resorting to fallacies, so I took a Debate class, where basically they taught us how to use fallacies in ways to trick others. It's like a Jedi mind trick; it only works on those who are weak-minded.
Four years late, but … fallacies don't necessarily occur alone, either. For example, Katt Williams rejected evolution with the argument "If we came from monkeys, then why the <expletive> are there still monkeys?" This compounds a straw man argument with a red herring.
3:36 "makes you look like a bit of an Egypt", according to the subtitles.
Sorry Jill, but every bad thing that increases is directly caused by the decrease in pirates.
SEALS BARK!!!!!!!! No further questions pls
Fallacies, so that's what it's called when i manipulate the perception of the situation to get other people to come to my conclusion via skewing the context…
A lot of these is how my sister argues, especially moving the goalposts.
"Gravity can be repealed by the relevant authority"
This is how conspiracy theories start…. what if we just haven't met something with the relevant authority
Imma use this against the feminists on tiktok 💅😗
So, from my understanding. The fallacy fallacy is the logical equivalent of the uno reverse card…
Interesting… very interesting laughs maniacally
Bwa-ha-ha!
I’m in love with whipping these out in any argument and making the other person look like a fool
1:43–2:01
brings in an astrophysicist to prove i'm not cheating by getting the astrophysicist to talk about statistics for an hour
you should always eat cake
Thank you for sharing the pain of philosophy students with the rest of the internet 👌
that was great
I love this!
Idk why my friend always falls for these types of fallacies especially those "my story animated videos" that are base on fictional, exaggerated stories with also straw man, weak analogy, hasty generalization , slippery slope, post hoc etc., even though those points are obvious that is not base on a real people's story, LOL. And she does not have a fluency of speaking English so it's hard for her to understand.
Nice ❤️
Nice
Tradition in its own is a fallacy, but useful as a context.
"We have always believed scientists" is an appeal to tradition that says I should believe scientists for an invalid reason: we always have.
But, if I understand WHY we have "always" believed scientists, then it's a short-hand for "scientists are reliable". Even if people don't know why, they know to trust scientists because of tradition, and if someone wants to oppose that tradition they must explain.
Can't Slippery Slopes still be true even if you can theoretically stop before the bottom?
For instance: "I believe if you are in love with someone, you should be allowed to marry them." Does this mean polygamy is fine? What about cheating on a spouse? "No! I'm talking about getting your fairy tale ending! Polygamy and cheating is wrong!" Well, your logic says they're both fine.
This person's logic leads down a slippery slope to things many cultures say is wrong. This person can choose to stop sliding down the slope before they reach the bottom, but that's not logical, since the argument, if true, goes further than the person is comfortable with. If this isn't a valide Slippery Slope argument, then what is it? The slope goes further, but they can stop before going further.
ENTP school
Hng on, I know you. You're the sword fighting lady! I was just after a refresher on logical fallacies. Cool 😀
I really just want to eat cake.
Thank you. I will definitely eat cake.
I particularly enjoyed hearing your example of Begging the Question at 3:03.
🧀
Watched all of it
Well you've made this video but in the comment you pinned providing time stamps, you had to add a correction, as such the premise of your video is incorrect. Since your video is incorrect, and in it you are speaking english, it goes to say that you are not properly speaking the language. As this video is not in English and is not correct, I assume the next video will also not be in english and not correct. As someone who does not make youtube videos, I am quite confident. Allowing this channel to continue will bring about mass moral decay, and the end of society. Because you're a person who is only doing this video to make money, you can't be trusted. Though regardless, all sources on the internet cannot be trusted. Though I don't make videos, I am a professional photographer, and I can say these things with certainty. The background of this video hurts my eyes anyways. I get so stressed when I have to talk to people so why would I use fallacies. They are common for a reason. We've always lived with Fallacies. You can't show me a world where fallacies aren't present, so they must be alright. We know fallacies are fine, I've certainly seen it said.
I was going to try and make one for each but I failed with appeal to nature and It's already so many sentences. This was awesome, thank you for making this video, it was easy to understand and fascinating.
It MUST be pointed out that the 'No True Scotsman' fallacy only applies where there is no standard to compare something against. I can make the completely valid statement that 'No true sledgehammer is made of gelatin.' without it being a fallacy because sledgehammers have to be able to concentrate a lot of force in a small area and gelatin just can't do that. (…though it would be hilarious to watch someone try!)
Giving me flashbacks of introducion to Calculus that I took earlieer this semester.
I unfortunately dug my own grave by not studying about fallacies for midterms and ended up not knowing the meanings of some of them.
Soooo…. I should eat cake. WILCO!! xD
Beams this video into the brains of every Twitter user
5:57 "If it doesn't have a tail it's not a monkey, even if it has a monkey kind of shape. If it doesn't have a tale it's not a money, if it doesn't have a tail it's not a money it's an ape"
love the belladonna detail. belladonna is a very potent poisonous kind of flower, so the irony there is great.
Some other :
Because you heard Version 1 of story prior to version 2 doesn't mean that either of them is closer to the truth than the other.
Because it works for you doesn't mean it works for others. (Personnal experience bias, more or less the same than Personal Incredulity but the other way around)
My personnal is Faulty Analogy, because I love to compare things too much and end up making extremely poor/out of place comparisons XD
I'm not sure which fallacy this is, but I remember hearing one with umbrellas as an example. "I've never gotten wet before. Clearly this umbrella just isn't necessary." (no, it just means the umbrella's working)
I like cheese.