Art

Locke, Berkeley, & Empiricism: Crash Course Philosophy #6



This week we answer skeptics like Descartes with empiricism. Hank explains John Locke’s primary and secondary qualities and why George Berkeley doesn’t think that distinction works — leaving us with literally nothing but our minds, ideas, and perceptions.

PBS Digital Studios wants to get to know you better! If you have 10 minutes, we’d really appreciate it AND you’ll be entered for a chance to win a t-shirt! https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/pbsds2016

Images and video via VideoBlocks or Wikimedia Commons, licensed under Creative Commons by 4.0: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Produced in collaboration with PBS Digital Studios: http://youtube.com/pbsdigitalstudios

Crash Course Philosophy is sponsored by Squarespace.
http://www.squarespace.com/crashcourse

Want to find Crash Course elsewhere on the internet?
Facebook – http://www.facebook.com/YouTubeCrashC
Twitter – http://www.twitter.com/TheCrashCourse
Tumblr – http://thecrashcourse.tumblr.com
Support CrashCourse on Patreon: http://www.patreon.com/crashcourse

CC Kids: http://www.youtube.com/crashcoursekids

CrashCourse

Source

Similar Posts

28 thoughts on “Locke, Berkeley, & Empiricism: Crash Course Philosophy #6
  1. I hope crash course reads this! (I am so thankful for your educational videos / slight addiction, due to being dyslexic I learn visually and this is the only platform I can learn and take it in) thank you ??

  2. Didn't they basically have the same idea then? All of us can perceive, but without perception there's still something. What's the difference between a being that watches everything all the time, so everything keeps existing, and a ''physical world''?

  3. Wait… Berkeley is bunk. Our labels of matter is the perception. That doesn't mean matter doesn't exist. We call color color, but it's still there.

  4. I wonder what these philosophers would think if they had access to the knowledge of modern science. Atoms, reactions, chemicals, physics etc

  5. There is only the occurrence of perception, it's not necessarily that there is a perceiver (that's a false assumption). Buddhism blows these guys out of the water.

  6. This video explained Locke's concepts better than Locke does. It feels like Locke's definitions of Primary and Secondary qualities weren't as consistent in "An Essay Concerning Human Understanding".

  7. What about micro-organisms that live on us, don't they perceive parts of us thus making us existant? what if it was just the existence of microscopic beings that are what determine we exist as they perceive we exist?

  8. I’ve never enjoyed studying but man I literally just laughed at how someone has to look at while I’m sleeping so I can exist ????

  9. New achievement unlock! New level unlock! Mind blown!Crushcourse listen, im being paying attention about this topic, and i tried to denied everything too and denying how i went a moment ago and the only exist is my thoughts just like this video, i feel good and i feel it why its feels good to meditate, and i tried to experiment something and i know this sounds weird but im planning to think empiricism which my thoughts only exist while masterbating, when seaman went out, i dont feel pain like after the pop and i feel the goodnes but not the same satisfiction as always be , it feels like all are well equal or just fine like not bad or not good just middle of it, weird right , i did bec. I was curious what will happen if i use my body sense to my thoughts. Reply if you did the same expirement

  10. Einstein, for all his brilliance, thought the moon still was up there even while he was not looking at it. Science, hot on the heels of Berkeley and most Eastern philosophy, has proved him wrong. And Locke? Dinosaur favorite of those not brave enough to go all the way.

Comments are closed.

WP2Social Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com