TSC 2016 Plenary 11 Quantum Approaches 2

5 thoughts on “TSC 2016 Plenary 11 Quantum Approaches 2”

1. 21:46 Experiment = Light Buddha

2. The "incomplete" statistical collapse (~1% effect), make it all smell a bit suspicious to me. Regarding Radin et al. and long distance telepathy.

3. Actually, it wasn't the Pope who refused to look through Galileo's telescope, it was the astronomy scholars, the scientific establishment of his time, who refused to look. That's what he wrote to Kepler. So, you see, it's even more of an appropriate analogy when you report it accurately.

4. has anyone peer reviewed the research? I hope it is done soon if not already. Sad that this sort of study has to take the same stage with spiritualist.

5. Does this Radin guy strike you as a stupid, lazy, slipshod, wild-eyed, devious, and underhanded snake oil salesman (?)  Or does he strike you as someone who is jumping through extraordinary hoops to be as rigorous as humanly possible in his research (?)

Comments are closed.