A New Understanding of Gravity

48 thoughts on “A New Understanding of Gravity”

1. Main episode with Claudia de Rham: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ve_Mpd6dGv8
   As a listener of TOE you can get a special 20% off discount to The Economist and all it has to offer! Visit https://www.economist.com/toe

2. A New Understanding of Gravity is Quantum Gravitation which has three types namely: 1. Quantum Anti-Gravity; 2. Quantum Gravity; and 3. Quantum Neutral Gravity.

   Claudia and Curt, Quantum Gravity is real. We definitely need Quantum Gravity for several reasons such as unification of Standard Model of Particle Physics with Gravity and with the Fundamental Forces of Nature, thereby realizing the Unified Quantum Field Theory and the Theory of Everything in Physics.

   We now have an empirical testable scientific theory of Quantum Gravity – The unitary Trinity God Theory and Equations that are deeply hidden in plain sight and manifested by Quantum Gravitation, Quantum Gravitational Entanglement and Gravitational Quantum Computation.

   Quantum Gravity and the theory, mathematics, laws, reproducible experiments and observations that underpinned it, is crucial for an empirical real true Quantum Theory of Gravity that would finish Einstein's Revolution in physics. Problem is that, since the 17th century up to the present, the Mathematics and Physics that we have so far cannot solve the problem of the true nature of Gravity.

   Mathematics is invented and discovered. That's my personal experience. I've invented/discovered a completely new mathematics in the course of my 30-year-long basic research on Quantum Gravity in Singapore. I called it Majulah Matematika in honour of my home country Singapore. I use it to solve one of the most difficult conundrums in physics- the True Nature of Gravity. In addition, I also have invented/discovered the elusive Magnetic Monopole and the Gravitational Computation Language and Codes that program and run the Quantum Gravitation and the Universe itself as the Ultimate Massive Cosmic Computer System covering the entire observable Universe.

   Here is one of the many solutions that we can derive from my new mathematics: A Computer Universe that is real. It is run by Quantum Gravitational Computation, Quantum Gravitational Entanglement and Quantum Gravitation covering the entire Universe. An empirical Theory of Quantum Gravity is the key. And it will led us to understanding of how and why Gravity works. It will also at the same time, debunk and invalidate String Theory, Loop Quantum Gravity, M Theory, Theory of General Relativity and all failed and wrong theories of gravity. But it will proved and validate Einstein's Hidden Variables and EPR's authors Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen correct. The Hidden variables are: Quantum Gravity, Quantum Anti-Gravity, Quantum Neutral Gravity, the macroscopic cosmic scale Gravitational Quantum Entanglement and Gravitational Quantum Computation. All these would complete the Quantum Foundation, Unification of Gravity with Quantum Mechanics and the realization of Theory of Everything in Physics.

   I have discovered and cracked the code of the true nature of Gravity in my over 30 years of basic research works in Singapore. This discovery/invention/theory of mine include THE GOD EQUATION – THE TRINITY Equations, Laws and Codes For QUANTUM GRAVITATION , QUANTUM GRAVITATIONAL ENTANGLE MENT and GRAVITATIONAL QUANTUM COMPUTATION that pave the way for Theory of Everything in Physics: – THE 3-in-1 HOLY GRAILS of Physics:

   1. Quantum Anti-Gravity/Spin Up Quantum Gravitational Entanglement/0 Rhu Bit or R Bit:
   
   QAG = ∆QGOρ < ∆QGFρ = ↑α

   2. Quantum Gravity/Spin Down Quantum Gravitational Entanglement/1 Rhu Bit or R Bit:
   
   QG = ∆QGOρ > ∆QGFρ = ↓α

   3. Quantum Neutral Gravity/Superposition Quantum Gravitational Entanglement/01 and/or 10 Rhu Bit or R Bit:
   
   QNG = ∆QGOρ = ∆QGFρ = ↑↓α

   We now have a working Quantum Theory of Gravity that is testable and complete with reproducible empirical experiments with the same results if repeated over and over again and again, confirmed by empirical observations in nature with 7-Sigma level results, guided by empirical Laws, Cosmic/Universal Computation and physical/mathematical Trinity God Equations that are predictive, precise and does no collapse even in high energies of Big Bang and singularity of Black Hole.

   Quantum Gravity or Quantum Gravitation have three types that are equivalent to and manifested by Quantum Computational Gravitation- the biggest and most powerful Computer Software Program and Hardware in the Universe and Quantum Gravitational Entanglement – a Quantum Entanglement at Macroscopic Cosmic Scale namely:

   1. Quantum Anti-Gravity = Spin Up Quantum Entanglement State;

   2. Quantum Neutral Gravity = Superposition Quantum Entanglement State;

   3. Quantum Gravity = Spin Down Quantum Entanglement State.

   Quantum Gravitation is governed by and follow the unitary Trinity Laws, Mathematics and Physics of Quantum Gravitation, Gravitational Quantum Computation and Quantum Gravitational Entanglement. We now have a new Laws of Physics and two newly discovered Fundamental Forces of Nature – The Quantum Neutral Gravity and Quantum Anti-Gravity which completed the heart of the Quantum Theory of Gravity published in London. Paris and Zurich last December 2022 as follows:

   1. First Law of Quantum Gravitation: Rovira’s Universal Law of Quantum Gravitation:

   “The greater mass density of gravitating Quantum Objects than the Quantum
   
   Gravitational Field causes a downward acceleration of the Quantum Objects in a
   
   Quantum Gravitational Field instantaneously mediated by Graviton.”

   – Roel Real Rovira

   Equation for Quantum Gravity, and Spin Down Quantum Gravitational Entanglement:

   QG = ∆QGOρ > ∆QGFρ = ↓α

   Where:

   QG is Quantum Gravity in Rovira (value of downward acceleration force due to quantum gravity) in kg.

   ∆QGOρ is Differential Change in greater mass density of Quantum Gravitating Objects than the mass density of Quantum Gravitational Field in kg/m2 or g/cm3.
   
   ∆QGFρ is Differential Change in mass density of Quantum Gravitational Field in kg/m2 or g/cm3.
   
   ↓α is the Resultant Downward Acceleration of Gravitating Quantum Objects in mtr/sec.

   2. Second Law of Quantum Gravitation: Rovira’s Universal Law of Quantum Anti-Gravity.

   “The lesser mass density of gravitating Quantum Objects than the Quantum Gravitational
   
   Field causes an upward acceleration of the Quantum Objects in a Quantum Gravitational
   
   Field instantaneously mediated by Graviton.”
   
   -Roel Real Rovira

   Equation for Quantum Anti-Gravity/Spin Up Quantum Gravitational Entanglement:

   QAG = ∆QGOρ < ∆QGFρ = ↑α

   Where:

   QAG is Quantum Anti-Gravity in Rovira (value of upward acceleration force due to quantum anti-gravity) in kg.
   
   ∆QGOρ is Differential Change in lesser mass density of Quantum Anti-Gravitating Objects than the mass density of Quantum Gravitational Field in kg/m2 or g/cm3.
   
   ∆QGFρ is Differential Change in mass density of Quantum Gravitational Field in kg/m2 or g/cm3.
   
   ↑α is the Resultant Upward Acceleration of Anti-Gravitating Quantum Objects in mtr/sec.

   3. Third Law of Quantum Gravitation: Rovira’s Law of Quantum Neutral Gravitation.

   “The equal mass density of gravitating Quantum Objects and the Quantum Gravitational
   
   Field causes a zero acceleration or floating or hoovering of the gravitating Quantum Objects
   
   in a Quantum Gravitational Field, instantaneously mediated by Graviton.”
   
   – Roel real Rovira

   Equation for Quantum Neutral Gravity and Superposition Quantum Gravitational Entanglement:

   QNG = ∆QGOρ = ∆QGFρ = ↑↓α

   Where:
   
   QNG is Quantum Neutral Gravity in Rovira (value of zero acceleration force due to quantum neutral gravity) in kg.
   
   ∆QGOρ is Differential Change in equal mass density of Quantum Neutral Gravitating Objects to the mass density of Quantum Gravitational Field in kg/m2 or g/cm3.
   
   ∆QGFρ is Differential Change in mass density of Quantum Gravitational Field in kg/m2 or g/cm3.
   
   ↑↓0α is the Resultant zero acceleration or non-acceleration of Neutral Gravitating Quantum Objects in mtr/sec.

   More detailed information could be found on the published papers 2 years ago in London, Paris, and Zurich, online and at the two scientific Journals ACADEMIA and REAL TRUE NATURE. Alternatively, you can google the name of the author ROEL REAL ROVIRA to arrive at the published paper on Quantum Gravity.

   Most recently, additional two well respected scientific journals namely NATURE and the AMERICAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY APS Physical Review Journals have officially invited this author to submit manuscripts on his Research on Quantum Gravity for publication for PRX QUANTUM in preparation for a celebration for International Year of Quantum IYQ 2025 to showcase the best papers of the year.

   Copyright 2022 ROEL REAL ROVIRA. All Rights Reserved.

3. Isn't it a funny old thing that even scientists think that large parts of what can be understood by humans about the universe is a DONE DEAL.. "look see what we can do with our equations" they say we are about to hit a singularity of knowledge and understanding… "NOT with that attitude" says I

4. Im gonna tell you guys the truth you can thank me later.
   Gravity is more aligned with the properties of a fluid.
   Look at how helicopters achieve lift or how hot air ballons achieve lift . Occams razor.
   stop over complicating everything .
   i saw my first UF0 in afghanistan back in 2012 and i got to see the theory of relativity made dumb simple. The aliens are showing us things like fission but people would rather gatekeep for money.
   Without gravity or zero gravity life couldn't exist
   Thank me later

5. Graviton has not been proved

6. I just don't know when all this talk deviates from reality, without data and experiments, it's wild speculation – mathematical abstractions at best. These physicists know so much about dead peoples ideas, but can't show anything in a lab.

7. "All fundamental forces necessarily have a particle as a messenger because everything is quantum." – This would be a great hypothesis, but sold as a certainty, it's peddling kool-aid. And to even posit the graviton, you need an analog to the electron which "posits" (doesn't even prove!) the virtual photon. This person is so certain that gravitons exist and that everything is quantum. A true physicist would admit that "gravitons might exists and everything might be quantum." It must be nice to be so certain and self-satisfied, but her certainty is misleading viewers and it's woefully unscientific to peddle hypotheses as facts.

8. She is extraordinary. Her intellectual honesty leads her to question "unquestionable" or unquestioned concepts. The case of gravity involves redefining what FORCE is, but even more, WHAT A "PARTICLE" IS. I believe that the classical notion of "particle" as something punctual or having "individuality" prevents a deeper understanding of gravity – including in Claudia de Rham's extraordinary approach.

9. Look at scientific book made by professional not podcasts.

10. I don't think there is a such thing as gravitons. Rather that gravity results from the relative motion of positive and negative charges "vibrating" at relativistic speeds with respect to each other. Most likely and more specifically, I suspect it is all in the quarks. Think of it like two parallel wires conducting equal currents… If the currents are in the same direction, the wires repel and vice versa. Thats analogous to what is happening with positively and negatively charged quarks but in one dimension rather than three. The implication is that by controlling the vibration/frequencies of the quarks, we could create repulsive forces, or "antigravity". That's my theory and I'm sticking to it! 🙂

11. "Gravity", both Newtons and Einsteins, is NOT "a self-consistent theory" at all. Newtons doesn´t work on galactic scales in which our Solar System and its motions participate, so we really have TWO set of laws of celestial motions in the same closed galactic system which is directly unscientific.
    And Einsteins model of "gravity" is nothing else but a mental construct.
    The entire idea and explanation of celestial motions has to include electromagnetic forces which set it all in rotation and orbital motion, right from the plasma stages in cosmic clouds of gas and molecules which is assembled by the strong attractive electromagnetic force and distributed perpendicularly in the galactic disk planes as stars and planets.

12. EINSTEIN – A MISCONCEPTION OF THE HUMAN MIND ????
    Einsteinium generated Science is itself fundamentally flawed. The "Bending of time & Space" is itself a crackpot idea. As "Time" is simply a human concept of the mind. So does NOT exist in Mother Nature. Hence you cannot bend space & time, only the ridiculous human mind ! Mother Nature is not insane, only Humans !!!
    And as for Gravity, it will eventually be recognised that this "Force" is itself electrically based. So Sir Isaac Newtons "Law of Gravity" which seems to work on Earth, will in the light of Space exploration, require some modification !!!

13. f(^_^) A black hole is an anarchy computer intelligently designed for the police that YouTube song blue on black. They won't have anarchy blindness and will benefit from anarchy. The imagination of the universe is anarchy poems that nice. I went completely through a black hole with an anarchy poem and they made a rendering with video game technology that was better than a picture.

14. Gravity is Dark Matter. And it pushes away instead of attracting. That’s probably why the universe is expanding

15. They use Gravity to cover up the lie[s] we have been taught…The Universe is Electric, and so are we. If she had unpacked that word salad with examples, that would have been helpful. Earth is a machine, not a natural occurrence. Whoever built this thing is as far above us as we are above the Ameoba…so guess who?

16. chronogravitism

17. F = mass x acceleration .. so if i drop a mass it accelerates to the ground due to the force of acceleration.
    What did i miss?

18. According to new theories of reality, space-time is just our perception of reality, not the 'actual' reality, due to evolution. Which kind of explains why ants do not really perceive us and our world. So if that is true, the conjecture about gravity is void.

19. Gravity is a dynamic magnetic field produced by the interchange between the Electron shells and the Protons.

20. If the Earth wasn't traveling through space at 67,000 mph but instead wasn't moving at all, would g (acceleration due to gravity) still be 9.8 meters per second squared (m/s2)? This question is rooted in the concept of treating Space-Time as a medium,. for a historical reference is was refered to as ether until Einstein's Theory of relativity.

21. Please, someone tell me. Who is General Ativity?

22. The thing about gravity is something you have no idea about and most likely could never understand. You just wanted to make a useless video.

23. Something that I don’t understand about what she’s saying- and I would never presume to disagree with someone who knows vastly more than I do- but there is an aspect of what she’s saying about gravity that doesn’t make sense to me. She says that gravity IS a force, just like the others…electromagnetism, the strong and weak nuclear forces…and that to describe gravity as somehow “different” is incorrect. I understand that. But here’s what’s confusing to me- there IS a difference between gravity and the others. In the case of magnetism, for example, there is no “mechanism” per se by which the magnetic forces act. Like poles repel, and opposite poles attract. There’s no “how” or “why” or “what” to explain. There’s no mechanism that you could see if you only had a strong enough microscope. There’s no microscopic machinery in action. The magnetic force simply is the way it is, and we just have to accept it on its own terms. Same for electricity, and the nuclear forces. But NOT true for gravity! For gravity, there IS a mechanism. The mechanism is space itself- the space warps, and curves, and as it does so the objects within it move according to the curvature. So the gravity is literally reaching out and “touching” the object on which it’s acting, using space itself as the medium. Whereas in the magnetic force there is no equivalent medium- there is nothing reaching out from the magnet and touching/moving the object. The object simply moves because it’s a fundamental law of nature that opposite charges attract and like charges repel. So, if I could ask her one question, it would be- how come you consider the gravitational force to be the same as the others while accounting for this major difference?

24. Why do you all make gravity so complicated. Gravity is simply particles from the galaxy, Sun and the ether making their way to electrical ground. Think it through Dum Dums

25. The statement “scientists will hate this” is such a laughable misrepresentation of what science is, an exploration of all thought and ideas through proven testing, if your theories are being dismissed then it’s your own fault for not providing fact based, consistent evidence of your theory

26. I think we use “gravity” as a definition to explain why things attract instead of it being a term that expresses the result of what’s actually happening. And what’s actually happening is electromagnetism creating the observable effect we call “gravity”.
    I think it’s similar to how we view “time”. Time isn’t the reason things progress in a seemingly forward motion….. “time” is just the measurement of our witnessed results of constant change in our spacial environment.
    “Gravity” is how we measure electro magnetism and “time” is how we measure change.

27. The Economist is junk, unless you see the world through a Marxist lens.

28. It's magnetism
    Magnetism Is Gravity

29. they say the sun's gravity is so strong but there is more stuff/matter coming out of the sun then whats going into it.

30. the graviton is just a theory deep down scientist are just mathemations that can work out complex math problems on speed and time, deeper down scientist admit they do not know what time, space or gravity is so there for can only know what they can see and calculate on paper basically stalling out mankind most likely to preserve religious beliefs

31. Big Gravity won't let the truth come out! If they lose gravity, then everything starts floating off into space and they lose all their money!

32. Cladia is making huge assumptions regarding the existence of "Gravity Particles". She is essentially stating "they must exist because otherwise Gravity is not compatible with our Mathematical model of the Quantum Mechanics." The problem is she is trying to force reality to fit her model, not the other way around. This is a fundamentally flawed approach, even if it turns out there does exist "Gravity Particles."
    We should never try to force Reality to fit our models – we must force our Mathematical Models to fit reality.

33. Gravitons? This is new? WHERE ARE THEY?

34. Greaat video. I sent it to my young grandsons who are taking physics and astrophysics. This was well thought out and concise.

35. A child is following the scientific method with: "The wheels on the bus go round and round." This song accurately and consistently describes everything you see a bus do exactly like math, but the child does not understand the bus, because wheels going round are NOT causal. The variables in gravity math are exactly like the wheels on the bus, they are NOT causal. What are we doing? You can't show me dimensions 1 or 2 in any real sense, and your favorite theory changes these fictional dimensions to CREATE your theory right under your nose ON PAPER! Constant light per observer was declared, NEVER observed. The relative-to-observer concept is the same narcissism that made the observer the center of the Universe -a mistake then and a mistake now. The NON-transformed reality IS STILL THERE. It didn't disappear just because you transformed it on your paper!

36. The way she says "gravatee" and "general relativitaa" grates me

37. She gets it.

38. I see spacetime. A fabric, and like throwing a crumpled sheet on the floor. And like watching that sheet fold and intertwine on itself, you have the "closeness" or "distance" between "times" as the surface of the sheet is constantly changing, like a crumpled bedsheet in free fall. Dimensions occur when the sheet gets close to another portion of the sheet. Dilation occurs when portions of the sheet are moving faster than others, or there is a protrusion into our side of the sheet from the other side close to velocity c, to balance the E, energy locally, and eventually on both sides of the sheet. Both sides of the sheet are relative. The sum of the energy in a packet of pure energy, a photon, and the sum of the energy (kinetic +mass) of a moving mass vith velicity v, and the stationary (stationary mass at that instant) m, ALL deform the sheet locally. Hence the relationship between E, m and c are conserved locally and globally. Now for the leap of faith… Deformations are conserved on each side (imagine the moibus strip here) now, there are no "two sides" to the sheet. That is the missing "balance" in energy. Mass and energy can pass across the sheet locally, but balance globally, and yet, that is always the same side, just not locally. A moibus strip can expand infinitely. Energy causes (E=mc²) a dip in the spacetime (the sheet), but since all is conserved, a dip must protrude somewhere else into our local side of the sheet, or distant sheet, and vice versa. This is anti-gravity, and anti-matter. This give and take across the sheet locally accounts for the missing mass and energies we can't find on our side locally, but are there globally across the entire moibus strip of the universe. Good luck. Party on!!🎉

39. She's not saying anything of importance.

40. I see gravity as the original quantum stuff , the memory or the bass to everything .

41. Gravity is merely an inversion of time. Time moves slower near massive objects and causes energies to be refracted or bent toward more massive objects in the quantum vibratory field. If you can align electron spin perpendicular to gravity you can evade its pull — or one can redirect the mass into momentum storage system to somewhat reduce pull of gravity: Or so some theories would imply. The density of the quantum field might not be consistent across the universe.

42. I wish I could understand the accent, no offense.

43. Το όλο θέμα βρίσκετε στην θεώρηση του παρατηρητή μεταξύ συνέχειας και ασυνέχειας . Στην GR τα μεγέθη είναι συνεχής ποσότητες , ενώ στην QM τα μεγέθη είναι ασυνεχή . Η γεωμετρία που θα γεφυρώσει τις δύο θεωρίες θα πρέπει να είναι μια ασυνεχής γεωμετρία που σε μεγάλους κβαντικούς αριθμούς να προκύπτει η γνώστη μας συνέχεια στο χώρο και στον χρόνο.

44. Any object with mass or energy—no matter how small—creates some curvature in spacetime. In Einstein’s framework (General Relativity), your body is essentially like a tiny bowling ball on the giant “trampoline” of spacetime. Of course, compared to Earth, the Sun, or a black hole, the dip your body makes is incredibly small—so small that you’d never notice its effects. But in principle, the curvature is still there because all mass/energy bends spacetime. So, in Einstein’s picture (General Relativity), the reason things fall (or seem pulled “down”) is that they’re following the curved paths (geodesics) in spacetime created by Earth’s mass. The “dip” analogy is just a simplified 2D image of what’s really a 4D curvature.

45. Force is defined by Newton's first law. Object goes straight unless force changes it's velocity.
    Now the question is what is straight. In Einsteinian manifold straight is a geodesic curve so gravity is not a force. In the Euclidian projection of this manifold straight is a straight line so gravity is a force.
    One would expect the Einsteinian manifold to be real and the Euclidian space just a projection of it, but force is also gradient of potential energy and gravitational potential energy is real, because we know stars exibit mass defect. I'm puzzled by this.
    Physicist these days don't even know what force is. That's incredible. Kurt you need to talk to me so I can eplain you couple of things.

46. I believe there is an aspect to gravity that is related to spin.

47. I'm glad this
    won't be on
    the test

48. Another interesting Thunderbolts Electric Universe video
    https://youtu.be/cgGTzXu3EA8?si=lZQ1FkbIriz5yNB-

Comments are closed.