Consciousness Explained p2 Brian Greene #shorts #science

16 thoughts on “Consciousness Explained p2 Brian Greene #shorts #science”

1. You’re describing hell! 🤣 actually it makes a lot of sense. That would also explain how God is everything and all knowing and it would also explain how God is all good. Because if that is the eternal place and that eternal place is hell perhaps it’s better to live in a world where suffering and pain and a flawed world with corruption exists allows our consciousness to understand it’s better to have loved and lost than not loved at all?

2. conciousness is truly beyond humans. sometimes it is sensible to admit defit.

3. Consciousness seems like an emergent property of the brain. As brain complexity increases, so too does the level of consciousness.

4. Yep in his dreams 🤣

5. The Amish have a community of their neighbors. Where's your neighbors. You only see your reflection in a glass. And belittle your viewers as beneath you.

6. The brain has a temperature you can measure with a thermometer. The mind has no temperature. The mind of God was in a cold brooding for self realization in the long-term planck time of uncertainty. It was haddes. Then satori! The Creators coherent self image was born . Let there be light. And sound and heat. You are all going back to hell to start over.

7. Dude there is some damn stupid ideas of woke .!.

8. "A Course in Miracles" explains all of this.

9. Ha?

10. They've already shown what Consciousness is a few years ago that's when the two lobes of your brain communicate back and forth slightly out of sync

11. Issac Asimov once said " Did the universe create conciousness or did conciousness create the universe ?

12. This guy is not an authority on the topic of consciousness with his bar stool analogy.

13. And, of course, science has got nowhere on the Hard Problem of Consciousness, i.e. how physicality could produce conscious experience. Credit and agreement re the guy’s “and there’s no proof of this…”

14. There is no moving particles I think. The wave is what moves and collapses into a bit of sensed "particle". When I asked the teacher "What's waving?" he frowned and said '"We don't ask what's waving here"..

15. It's becoming clear that with all the brain and consciousness theories out there, the proof will be in the pudding. By this I mean, can any particular theory be used to create a human adult level conscious machine. My bet is on the late Gerald Edelman's Extended Theory of Neuronal Group Selection. The lead group in robotics based on this theory is the Neurorobotics Lab at UC at Irvine. Dr. Edelman distinguished between primary consciousness, which came first in evolution, and that humans share with other conscious animals, and higher order consciousness, which came to only humans with the acquisition of language. A machine with primary consciousness will probably have to come first.

    What I find special about the TNGS is the Darwin series of automata created at the Neurosciences Institute by Dr. Edelman and his colleagues in the 1990's and 2000's. These machines perform in the real world, not in a restricted simulated world, and display convincing physical behavior indicative of higher psychological functions necessary for consciousness, such as perceptual categorization, memory, and learning. They are based on realistic models of the parts of the biological brain that the theory claims subserve these functions. The extended TNGS allows for the emergence of consciousness based only on further evolutionary development of the brain areas responsible for these functions, in a parsimonious way. No other research I've encountered is anywhere near as convincing.

    I post because on almost every video and article about the brain and consciousness that I encounter, the attitude seems to be that we still know next to nothing about how the brain and consciousness work; that there's lots of data but no unifying theory. I believe the extended TNGS is that theory. My motivation is to keep that theory in front of the public. And obviously, I consider it the route to a truly conscious machine, primary and higher-order.

    My advice to people who want to create a conscious machine is to seriously ground themselves in the extended TNGS and the Darwin automata first, and proceed from there, by applying to Jeff Krichmar's lab at UC Irvine, possibly. Dr. Edelman's roadmap to a conscious machine is at https://arxiv.org/abs/2105.10461

16. "I Think, Therefore I Am"😅😅

Comments are closed.