Future Tech Pilot
Midjourney snuck in this much-requested feature! Now you’re able to assign custom weights to image prompts featuring multiple pictures … in this video I’ll show you some common use-cases and the ultimate way to create unique images
► ARTICLE:
www.futuretechpilot.com/midjourney-tutorials/custom-image-weights
► NEW FREE Prompt Pack
✅ https://ftp.live/free-prompt-pack-1
► FREE PDFS
✅ Prompt Ad-Libs + 20 Category Key Words: http://ftp.live/ad-libs
✅ Camera Angles + Lenses: http://ftp.live/camera-lenses
✅ 200 Aesthetics: http://ftp.live/200Styles
✅ Midjourney Cheat Sheet: http://ftp.live/CheatSheet
► PROMPT PACKS
✅ Photorealism Prompt Pack: https://ftp.live/photoreal-pack
✅ Midjourney Variety Pack #1: http://ftp.live/variety-pack
✅ A.I Art Ad-Libs: https://ftp.live/ad-libs-premium
► MIDJOURNEY WRITTEN TUTORIALS
http://ftp.live/mjtutorials
► LET’S CONNECT
Discord – https://discord.gg/hK6AmynjAn
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/futuretechpilot/
5:08 Midjourney is like a slot machine, so good luck!
I say don't take it too seriously when Midjourney doesn't show what you specifically imagined. You can always heavily compose the generated images and edit them in photo editing software like Photoshop using their new feature, Generative Fill. This might get you closer to what you imagined eventually. I know it works for me as a professional photo editor artist.
I don't like Midjourney when it gives me too many random results, especially when I use too many images to blend. If you're looking to be specific, then using fewer images to work on might be ideal.
Anyway, I still believe Midjourney will rise to the top again against its competitors. Have you heard that Leonardo AI has a photoreal feature? I don't have a subscription to Leonardo, but when I look at their sample images from the new photoreal feature, it definitely seems to be able to compete with Midjourney. Please keep up the good work, Midjourney! I'm already a 2-month subscriber, and I would be sad if I had to switch to Leonardo AI instead. So, I can't wait to see what Midjourney offers in the upcoming version.
Thanks again to Future Tech Pilot for the wonderful, super easy-to-understand tutorial on the latest Midjourney feature. You have at least 5 exercises that we could try in just this one single video. You're a lifesaver!
I really don't understand the logic of using decimal numbers given the explained ratio.
Why just not use, 1, 2, 4, etc… less characters and faster to interpretate.
Fantastic, thnx!
You have enhanced my prompting. Thank you so much.
Love the term Slot Machines! Sometime you will get a perfect picture with one minor detail that will mess up the entire picture and then you get lost in variations wasting credits or precious time!
Is there any contact information for business cooperation?
Interesting updates, thank you!
May be “ a queen with a SMALL necklace….” This might work better 🙂⭐️
Thanks FTP! I missed this whole update. I'm crap at math so many thanks for your weight experimentation!
We’re working on a spoofy movie trailer using Midjourney for the images and this is helpful. It’s been very difficult to get the look we want. We’ll try this. Thank you 🌟🌝
Or just get good at prompting and then you don't need any images.
So it still can't do product photography? What happened to the AI is going to steal jobs ? lol
cool but why write the ratios in decimal points, that isn't for e
everyone. for demonstration purposes it would be easier to stick to 2 , 4, 8?
Best Trick: generate a image with –s 0. After that vary (subtile) with a –s 1000 (remix mode on). With this strategy u get the result what u need.😉
👍👍👍💅
Why are MJ results so weird since July?
Been making vids with MJ for 6 months. You will never get exactly what you want. But you can settle for something close enough. Love using MJ!
Absolutly genius and helpful. Thank you.
(3:44) "Now both of those are going to blend together and be three times as important as the subject." Technically that is incorrect. The "original image" constitutes 1/7th of all "weight" in a 1/3/3 system while the other two "combine" to form the other 6/7ths of all "weight". That means they as a group are now six times more "important" than the original subject even though they are equal in importance relative to each other. Hence, the original vanished. If you actually wanted the two jewelry shots to be collectively "three times as important", your numbers would be 2, 3, and 3.
I quite liked the video!
Btw, what does unsplash mean?