Down The Rabbit Hole Of The Delayed Choice Quantum Eraser | Answers With Joe

21 thoughts on “Down The Rabbit Hole Of The Delayed Choice Quantum Eraser | Answers With Joe”

1. Yes I believe thought and feel has a part in the real life events.

   I two times before I had and accident, i have something that keeps bothering my mind/heart that something isn't right or weird feeling. And actually i got accident a couple hours after that.
   First time i feel it accident happened (boss chew me on work for the first time).
   But the next one when i feel it again i prepared my heart/mind and do everything more carefully to minimize the impact of accident(chain on my bike broke) because i ride slower than usual than everything is okay.

   And it happened more than 5 times to me (with different cases and feel) .

   Or everything is just coincidence and I just over think it. 🤔😵

2. john wheeler believed it's human consciousness , infact because you yourself showed in the experiment that the wave did not collapse once the information was scrambled showed that the act of measurement is not what causes the collapse, but that measurement's observation.

3. If there is "anti-matter" why not "anti-physics" as well? Maybe it's causing some sort of mirror effect that is reflecting back to produce these results? When you cross into the mirror your reflection becomes the new reality perhaps?

4. Very nice video, but I have to point out that it is unscientific to say that consciousness absolutely can't have anything to do with this. Hypotheses are to be ruled out by experimentation not "common sense" (we left that behind a long time ago in quantum physics) or by cultural bias.

5. @3:07 for scale.

6. So in theory, at least according to what you said, is still not your "Normal State." It's still being recorded. Even if you know it or no.

   Edit: @ 07:17

7. the presents determins the past

8. 6:49 If you are wearing no pants does it still count?

9. Would love for someone to prove me wrong because I'm really trying to understand this. Why do people suppose that the delayed choice experiment indicates particles are communicating backwards through time when its much more elegant to assume that both the detectors and the sheet where patterns are formed are simultaneously in superposition, and that observing either will collapse the other waveform? This would mean that, in our original experiment, it is not the detectors themselves that collapse the waveform, but that instead it is our placement of the detectors that was in itself an observation and that the waveform was always collapsed.

   To me this is actually proof against your statement that entanglement is a property of measurement and not a property of consciousness. The delayed choice quantum eraser would seem to suggest that the measurement done by machine is subject to being re-written as long as consciousness has not observed the information.

10. I hate when people completely disregard anything they consider "fringe". Its anti-science to put personal bias into shit.

11. I can't even lie…. I think I've officially gone gay for you Joe

12. To answer your question on how two different realities of physics can co-exist: It’s called The Force. It originated in a galaxy far, far away.

13. Shows that consciousness does collapse the waveform. Scientists are just too proud to admit it. If measured, Light knows (at least acts as if) that it will be observed eventually. This is why it will only act like a wave if it “knows” it’s information will be deleted and never observed by a conscious being. Consider what you said. You act differently in front of a camera but it is not because of the camera it is because the camera is recording information that will eventually be seen by a conscious human like me (who will judge you). If, however, you made a camera out of wood you’d probably act more normally (though maybe not entirely due to habits). Still, seems to me all said here only gives credence to the conscious theory. Funny that scientists and science lovers want to negate anything that may seem spiritual just because it’s spiritual.

14. What happens if they have the exact same setup but just don't measure the particle (So if they measure it by means of a Camera they just don't hit record) , will it then end up as a interference pattern? If it still acts as a particle then I would assume the setup is to blame.. Right?

15. I think you are now tied with Scott Manley for my favorite YT channel

16. Measurement cannot be accomplished, without a conscious observer present to actually take the measurement and attach significance to it. That's not to say that "we create reality with our thoughts" …we don't …however, without a conscious observer, the wave doesn't collapse. It's like Schrodinger's cat ….until there is a conscious observer the cat is neither alive or dad …it's merely possibilities.

17. As always excellent informative video.

    I think that quantum entanglement poses more questions about the nature of distance (ie space) and time…I wonder if entangled particles might be a different form of an Einstein Bose Condensate where both particles actually share the same wave function and therefor are not specifically “communicating” across time and space… because communication requires two discrete points.

    Also I highly recommend Dr Physics A’s video on Bell’s inequality…probably the most elegant experiment ever designed that proves that hidden variables cannot be the reason for the EPR (entanglement) paradox.

18. I don't think It's that hard to get a grasp of, unless you try to assign equations or set of physics rules to understand it.
    
    Photons or bosons in general are weightless, higher dimensional prarticles. they don't experience time and space and they pop to our 3d plane only when given energy.
    
    I would be very supprised if in our lifetime we as humans make significant progress into understanding that phenomena, it's just seems odd and out of reach like observing naked singularity or measuring conciousness.

19. So it doesnt matter the distance the detectors are moved back? Like what about lightyears? Couldnt we use that to see if aliens exist?? Lol seriously though (assuming they also are trying to detect some shiz) worth a shot, right??

20. I have a question. Not a physicist so don't laugh. It looks in the past to us, but for the photon there's only now? Say you're a photon, you leave Andromeda, as far as we are concerned 2.5 million years ago. But the photon is at the speed of light and it's clock has stopped, it has no time. It is created .. then destroyed when it hits my camera and passes through every point in between … all at the same instant … it's clock has stopped. From the photons perspective, there is no delay?

21. Can you please tell us about your recent arrest?

Comments are closed.