ScienceTV
http://facebook.com/ScienceReason … Albert Einstein’s Theory of Relativity (Chapter 4): E = mc² (Mass-Energy Equivalence)
In physics, mass-energy equivalence is the concept that the mass of a body is a measure of its energy content. In this concept the total internal energy E of a body at rest is equal to the product of its rest mass m and a suitable conversion factor to transform from units of mass to units of energy. If the body is not stationary relative to the observer then account must be made for relativistic effects where m is given by the relativistic mass and E the relativistic energy of the body.
—
Please subscribe to Science & Reason:
• http://www.youtube.com/Best0fScience
• http://www.youtube.com/ScienceMagazine
• http://www.youtube.com/ScienceTV
• http://www.youtube.com/FFreeThinker
—
Albert Einstein proposed mass-energy equivalence in 1905 in one of his Annus Mirabilis papers entitled “Does the inertia of a body depend upon its energy-content?” The equivalence is described by the famous equation E = mc2, where E is energy, m is mass, and c is the speed of light in a vacuum. The formula is dimensionally consistent and does not depend on any specific system of measurement units. For example, in many systems of natural units, the speed of light is set equal to 1, and the formula becomes the identity E = m; hence the term “mass-energy equivalence”.
The equation E = mc2 indicates that energy always exhibits mass in whatever form the energy takes. Mass-energy equivalence also means that mass conservation becomes a restatement, or requirement, of the law of energy conservation, which is the first law of thermodynamics. Mass-energy equivalence does not imply that mass may be ‘converted’ to energy, and indeed implies the opposite. Modern theory holds that neither mass nor energy may be destroyed, but only moved from one location to another.
In physics, mass must be differentiated from matter, a more poorly defined idea in the physical sciences. Matter, when seen as certain types of particles, can be created and destroyed, but the precursors and products of such reactions retain both the original mass and energy, both of which remain unchanged (conserved) throughout the process. Letting the m in E = mc2 stand for a quantity of “matter” may lead to incorrect results, depending on which of several varying definitions of “matter” are chosen.
E = mc2 has sometimes been used as an explanation for the origin of energy in nuclear processes, but mass-energy equivalence does not explain the origin of such energies. Instead, this relationship merely indicates that the large amounts of energy released in such reactions may exhibit enough mass that the mass-loss may be measured, when the released energy (and its mass) have been removed from the system.
Einstein was not the first to propose a mass-energy relationship. However, Einstein was the first scientist to propose the E = mc2 formula and the first to interpret mass-energy equivalence as a fundamental principle that follows from the relativistic symmetries of space and time.
• http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass%E2%80%93energy_equivalence
.
Source
No calculus
Is time while going to another planet remain same for that planet…
Thank you for sharing this interesting video. I saw some interesting videos, with new theories aboutmotion and colorfulness of photons, on SALEH THEORY-com chanel.
the music is torture
E = mc2
Refer to “Infinity In Your Pocket”, Mike Flynn which states.
That the E in the equation E=mc2 represents “One Unit of Energy”.
However Energy of itself is an unknown substance that does not possess a “Unit of Quantity or Value”.
Yet in the equation E=mc2
“E” is given “By Einstein” a value that “He States” is equal to;
The “Energy” of a “None-Quantified or Identified Amount of Mass”
Mass Which “He Einstein States Cannot Travel at the Speed of Light”
Yet He “Einstein” Multiplies Mass By The Speed Of Light
And then to add insult to injury, “Squares It”
Amazing!
Even more so when you consider that mass is energy subject to the “additional” attractional force = Energy of Gravity.
Mass Is
Energy = Unknown Substance of Force
+
Gravity = Force of Unknown Substance of Energy
Therefore E + G =
E + E
Two amounts of the Unknown Substance of Energy
Not One Unit or Quantity of Energy
Therefore the singular E of E=mc2 Is supposedly equal to
E + E
Multiplied
By the unspecified amount of Energy, that the unspecified amount of Mass exerts to achieve the Speed of Light which is 300, 000 km per second
Squared is 9000,000,000 km per second.
Which is also impossible to achieve according to Einstein, because he always maintained that mass cannot achieve the speed of light.
However regardless of all this!
As it is an absolute incontrovertible fact, that Energy is unknown fundamental substance which has no known quantity/unit of value.
Therefore it is a fact
E=mc2
Has no value.
EINSTEIN'S GENIUS MADE SIMPLE
Einstein's Theory of Acceleration
Einstein stated in regard to the force of acceleration that;
If a lift was taken into outer space and then accelerated, the acceleration of the lift would cause a torch beam of light shining across the lift, to bend under the force of the lifts power of acceleration.
A beam of light is comprised of trillions of energy particles called Photons, and when you switch on a torch the photons shoot forward like speeding bullets, travelling at a speed of 300, 000 kilometers per second.
Therefore in order for the torch beam to bend under the power of the lifts acceleration, the atomic mass of the lift and its contents would have to out accelerate the 300, 000 kilometer speed of light, of the torch beam.
Which Einstein always maintained was impossible, because according “to him” nothing in the Universe can travel faster than the speed of light.
But then also according to him quote "If the facts do not fit the theory, change the facts"
Translation: If the truth does not fit in with your theory, lie through your teeth.
Please Note in regard to my post of 5 months ago (Below)
The Reference Wikipedia, is only given in regard to giving the reader the opportunity to read orthodox explanation of mass, prior to that my own explanation as to the nature of mass.
Its very simple !!!
You need to understand that even mass is a form of energy and mass and energy are interconvertible . Best example is mass defect in an atom where the actual mass of an nucleus is less then the combined mass of nucleons . The mass difference is converted into energy which holds the nucleons together in the nucleus .
E=mc²
E= Energy
m= Mass
c²= Speed of light
as feynman derived the graphical formula needs melody
the crashing of cimbols and the tinkle of xylophone
hi
um i thought the fusion reactors that are planned are going to be fuel with deuterium (2H) and tritium (3H) which would the form helium 4 (4He) and one extra neutron
Looking at The Hubble Theory the expansion of the universe changes things in Albert Einstein's timespace theory. It has been determined in Hubble universe everything is not all traveling at the speed of light but is traveling faster than light at the edge of the universes expansion location. from a single point the universe has been expanding or getting bigger by inflation for over 13 billion years. Looking at the bubble balloon in Hubble theory or bubble in Hawkings the inflating of the bubble is wider at the bubbles surface expanding faster and galaxies scattering away from one another. Becvause the geometrics is a ballon or bubble imagery – inflation or expansion maens the bubble is getting bigger and bigger all geometrically at the fabrc surface of the balloon. Look at it this way – the inflation causes the fabric spacetime surface of the bubble to 1) as a whole get bigger 2) it also causes the matter the galaxies to spread away from each other at a constant rate – the rate of the inflation. Even though the balloon expands at a certain velocity its affects are numeral – because its like a balloon it gets biger and any matter on its surface spreads away also at a certain distance – the distance of the inflation. Doing the math – the universe is causing the galaxies to physically expand a part at 450000 miles a second or about 2.6 times light speed. The geometrics relativity is a flatland surace grid and never changes or allows for changes and asserts everything is inside the bubble. Evidence like what I have just explained here illustrates matter resides outside the bubble on its surface and is the decipherable positions for the arithmetic and is backed by The Hubble Observations. The Quanta Physics Theory also uses a three dimension geometrics diagram of a oval balloon just like The Hubble Theory and is able to achieve its arithmetic data from it. In any sence the bubble may be assumed as a brane where some sort of pressure leak is creating a constant flow by which the universe has formed itself upon as a material world outside the brane. What makes Quanta Physics Theory so unique is the idea that because of this new information protrays a whole new physical construction about what the universe looks like its behavior BH theories and where it leads to are post predictive and expands knowledge about the cosmos.
I think the e stands for Energy of light.
I thought e=mc2 was a formula to create energy.mi thought if we combine mass and make it travel at the speed of light to the power of 2 we would creat energy
Hey helium what from the moon is gonna what ? Get a day job as a human we're having enough problems making steam from a nuclear reaction that was going to be completely safe and free us from our energy needs . Oh they didn't think about tsunamis or overrun reactor meltdowns ? Now we're going to die ? Well I hope we get some of that secret energy the moon has for us ? And just for us ?
Also , E = M X S . As in Energy = Mass x speed , where does any maniac come up with mcx2 is insanity . A small mass has as much energy as compared to the speed it can be exited too , just like your microwave . It doesn't lose mass or dilates , it hits and splits and excites other mass assemblies around its area of influence causing a large reaction encompassing other particles around it . Get a real job .
what does the c stand for//?
weird narator
great
Okay, timeisabsolute, what you said constitutes no more than a claim, a specious one at that. How about putting something forth to support your claim.
Of course, quoting from some goat herder's holy book won't work to support your claim, because THAT'S also just a claim.
the music sucks!!!!!!! just the human voice please
the reverb on the narrator's voice with these visuals= ecstasy of the mind
3:55 what is nukular power? I've heard of nuclear power, but not nukular power.
Wait, so if you convert energy into mass and then put the mass in a black hole, wouldn't that mean that you destroyed energy?
are this lectures for college? I knew this since I was a kid maybe I'll get back to school jajaja sounds so easy and understanding
Well that was a crazy journey from ep 1, holy cow…. but I feel like I can ace this test now!
V=at… so harcore
Einsteins relativity work is a magnificent mathematical garb which fascinates, dazzles and makes people blind to the underlying errors. The theory is like a beggar clothed in purple whom ignorant people take for a king… its exponents are brilliant men but they are metaphysicists rather than scientists.
"Nucular" …Really?
Very interesting. When Einstein showed his colleagues this formula, he said that bad people would use this for bad stuff. ( atomic bombs or nuclear weapons)
Yes, definitely.
With all due respect for your good efforts here, how can you bare reading nuclear as "nucular"? (3:55) Cheers!
Aside from being creepy, this was very informative. Thx'
Do you think human math is based on the dynamic geometry of the Universe? If we take E=MC² we can see that energy is linked to light. Light will radiate out in every direction at a constant speed forming a sphere therefore we have π in human mathematics. This is a continuous process with the future coming into existence light photon by light photon therefore we can only ever have an approximation of π.
This is an invitation to see an artist theory of the physics of ‘time’ as a physical process!
I did not knew about Mr. Clean's role in nuclear physics.
What if this was wrong and everything you know is a lie dum dum dummmmm
No you're not. F=ma and F=beta^3ma are two different representations in K. Neither of them is a representation in k, where it is primed; that is, F'=ma'. Therefore, your statement that F'-ma' is F=beta^3ma is incorrect because they correspond to two different systems, That said, it's impossible the motion of one body in one system, system K, to be described by two different laws of motion, namely, F=ma and F=beta^3ma, as the "theory" derives. That's a fatal flaw of the "theory".
I'm sorry to interrupt your discussion, but I want to ask you something.
I think you might have misinterpreted something in your video that should disprove Einstein's theory of relativity. If my thoughts are correct F=ma isn't F=β³ma but F´=ma´ is F=β³ma.
The moving electron is standing still. Not relatively to the spectator but relatively to its own coordinate system. Therefore it has another level of energy than the other still standing electron as seen by the spectator.
Could I be right?
Of course. Whatever empirical equations, if at all, are used for corrections in GPS, can have absolutely nothing to do w/ Einstein's "theory" of relativity.
so are your saying that the gps system should be able to work using only the galilean theory?
All of the "changes" brought about by Einstein's "theory" of relativity are completely wrong, without exception. It's not a scientific theory but is egregious nonsense which must be removed from science immediately.
in the beginning of your video you said that the Galilean theory of relativity is perfectly legitimate and consistent with nature… are you saying that all of the changes brought about by Einstein's theory are also wrong? (such as the slowing of clocks under speeds close to that of light, etc)