Smarthistory
Helen Frankenthaler, Mountains and Sea, 1952, oil and charcoal on unsized, unprimed canvas, 219.4 x 297.8 cm (National Gallery of Art, Washington)
Source
Similar Posts
11 thoughts on “Frankenthaler, Mountains and Sea”
Comments are closed.
Non-objective art is non-art. This video undercuts your integrity and otherwise valuable channel.
Beautiful work of art, Paola Avalos doesn't understand it's complexity and lack of gender influence this peice contains. It doesn't matter that the artist is female or male, all that matters is the intent.
Amazing art video
How did she use oil paint on raw unprimed canvas when oil will rot unprimed canvas?
She sounds like if Natalie Portman and Drew Barrymore had a love child.
MEH….she, like the majority of 'Abstract Painters', represent a 'School-of-Painting' that one–from day-one–could call: Putting pretty colors on Canvas. PERIOD. These 'artists' merely or factually represent the Philosophical and Spiritual 'Emptiness and Shallowness', of the Art World–Post WWII. And the Critics who support or advance them, regardless of all that pseudo-Psychiatric Analysis–made-up New Age vocabulary; are just another piece on a Mobile. BUT, really do love your series.
Newman and Rothko are personally my all-time favorites. They have use of good colors.
Great painting but one could argue it's almost a copy of Gorky's painting from the mid 1940s. Don't know why you used a more graphic, opaque example of Gorky in your video.
I can stare at a Rothko for hours, but Frankenthaler and, especially, Morris Louis, annoy me to no end……subjectivity is weird.
와우~😃 처음 보는 현대 미술 작가의 그림이군요 느낌이 좋아요 다양한 작가들의 그림과 비교 까지 해 주시니 더 좋습니다 영어를 알고 들으면 더 흥미로울텐데ᆢ 저의 무식한 영어가 안타까울뿐이네요…
This has always been one of my favorite pieces