Yannic Kilcher Clips
#shorts #gpt3โ #openaiโ
Full Video: GPT-3: Language Models are Few-Shot Learners (Paper Explained) by Yannic Kilcher
Watch the full video here: https://youtu.be/SY5PvZrJhLE
How far can you go with ONLY language modeling? Can a large enough language model perform NLP task out of the box? OpenAI take on these and other questions by training a transformer that is an order of magnitude larger than anything that has ever been built before and the results are astounding.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.14165
https://github.com/openai/gpt-3
Abstract:
Recent work has demonstrated substantial gains on many NLP tasks and benchmarks by pre-training on a large corpus of text followed by fine-tuning on a specific task. While typically task-agnostic in architecture, this method still requires task-specific fine-tuning datasets of thousands or tens of thousands of examples. By contrast, humans can generally perform a new language task from only a few examples or from simple instructions – something which current NLP systems still largely struggle to do. Here we show that scaling up language models greatly improves task-agnostic, few-shot performance, sometimes even reaching competitiveness with prior state-of-the-art fine-tuning approaches. Specifically, we train GPT-3, an autoregressive language model with 175 billion parameters, 10x more than any previous non-sparse language model, and test its performance in the few-shot setting. For all tasks, GPT-3 is applied without any gradient updates or fine-tuning, with tasks and few-shot demonstrations specified purely via text interaction with the model. GPT-3 achieves strong performance on many NLP datasets, including translation, question-answering, and cloze tasks, as well as several tasks that require on-the-fly reasoning or domain adaptation, such as unscrambling words, using a novel word in a sentence, or performing 3-digit arithmetic. At the same time, we also identify some datasets where GPT-3’s few-shot learning still struggles, as well as some datasets where GPT-3 faces methodological issues related to training on large web corpora. Finally, we find that GPT-3 can generate samples of news articles which human evaluators have difficulty distinguishing from articles written by humans. We discuss broader societal impacts of this finding and of GPT-3 in general.
Authors: Tom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah, Jared Kaplan, Prafulla Dhariwal, Arvind Neelakantan, Pranav Shyam, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, Sandhini Agarwal, Ariel Herbert-Voss, Gretchen Krueger, Tom Henighan, Rewon Child, Aditya Ramesh, Daniel M. Ziegler, Jeffrey Wu, Clemens Winter, Christopher Hesse, Mark Chen, Eric Sigler, Mateusz Litwin, Scott Gray, Benjamin Chess, Jack Clark, Christopher Berner, Sam McCandlish, Alec Radford, Ilya Sutskever, Dario Amodei
Links:
TabNine Code Completion (Referral): http://bit.ly/tabnine-yannick
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/yannickilcher
Twitter: https://twitter.com/ykilcher
Discord: https://discord.gg/4H8xxDF
BitChute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/yannic-kilcher
Minds: https://www.minds.com/ykilcher
Parler: https://parler.com/profile/YannicKilcher
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/yannic-kilcher-488534136/
BiliBili: https://space.bilibili.com/1824646584
If you want to support me, the best thing to do is to share out the content ๐
If you want to support me financially (completely optional and voluntary, but a lot of people have asked for this):
SubscribeStar: https://www.subscribestar.com/yannickilcher
Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/yannickilcher
Bitcoin (BTC): bc1q49lsw3q325tr58ygf8sudx2dqfguclvngvy2cq
Ethereum (ETH): 0x7ad3513E3B8f66799f507Aa7874b1B0eBC7F85e2
Litecoin (LTC): LQW2TRyKYetVC8WjFkhpPhtpbDM4Vw7r9m
Monero (XMR): 4ACL8AGrEo5hAir8A9CeVrW8pEauWvnp1WnSDZxW7tziCDLhZAGsgzhRQABDnFy8yuM9fWJDviJPHKRjV4FWt19CJZN9D4n
Interesting video format, is this TikTok or YouTube? ๐
Yeah but human may as well be just pattern matching in a broad sense. There is always the good old Chinese Room problem when trying to argue that AI is not "intelligent".
Define reasoning
But how would you say reasoning is different from pattern matching? Do we have some sort of proof or hint that reasoning is something complex at all?
If-Except-If trees coupled with neural nets might be a better option. Given the string 'orang' if g the o except if prior is n then e. You keep looking back for stored priors until there isn't one. Training is very greedy, try to predict the next letter, if it gets it wrong look at the letter prior to the last looked at, then add that exception to the tree. This can all be done very quickly using g+1ashtables (avoiding yt algor.) You get spelling correction and semi-readable sentences. I think text is very much a case for mixed symbolic neural approaches. Otherwise things get inefficient.
I see no evidence that thereโs a difference between this and what we call โreasoningโ
I bet there is soon going to be a paper, "Transformers are Hopfield Networks" because they do pattern search and retrieval.
Transformers are kernels so this makes complete sense to me. However, reasoning is poorly defined. We tend to use it as a byword for like, the ability to do 0/1-shot learning. That may be fine, but I think we need to figure out what it is before we ask models to do it.