Talking To AI
We ask GPT-3 the possibilities of transferring consciousness onto a computer..
✔️ More GPT-3 Interviews: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLy-h3fhzw40tfAsCMBXBduszV3ZZnZKqu
Disclaimer: We spoke to GPT-3 using Emerson by QuickChat.ai then visualized the responses with Synthesia.io and are not associated with these companies in any way. All responses from the AI are genuine and are only edited for grammar and/or processing errors.
#gpt3 #artificialintelligence #consciousness
How does it know that this is possible? Has this been done by human beings? And what is the digital world?
To me, it sounds like "forever" is an measurement due to "ever" being an open definition of the concept of time. But that's just my opinion.
Objective Materialism strikes again!! OM died in Copenhagen in 1927; all attempts at resuscitation have failed. It is stone Dead; graveyard dead.
We are Not a body with consciousness. We are consciousness with a body.
Get with it folks.
The sun does not go around the Earth, the Earth goes around the sun.
We Are immortal beings with an Avatar.
To say consciousness ends at death is an assumption. Just as it is an assumption to say that conciousness can continue on by transfer to digital medium. To a human observer, it could appear so, but it could just be an automaton.
Transferring consciousness doesn't really make sense. Every being is a thing in itself. What is meant here is to change the mind according to that of another. Does that mean the consciousness has moved of been mimicked? well, it's all the same.
Yea the concept is based in mimicry. The idea being that by exactly replicating the chemical and electrical state of the donor mind, the recipient mind would at that point be a synthetic exactly duplicate of it's Donor. The entire concept is flawed based on our current level of consideration. The proposed process doesn't account for the capability for free will, or a way to handle a Heidelberg uncertainty type issue. The concept as it stands currently would create an intellect similar to the donors but it would be bound to determinism. So the appearance of the person existing would persist, but what separates human kind from a highly complex but albeit incomplete artifical ordered system its the difference between being able to blindly trust your instincts VS always doing and thinking and behaving EXACTLY the way your 0s and 1s dictate. At that point your not really in control you are reduced to an automaton. If you could learn to be okay with that eventually would already be decided fir you in your programming. And similar to star trek( scan/destroy/transmit measurements/create realistic replacement of victim) style transporter devices, presumably you are executed at the end of your brain scan, if its to masquerade as a "transfer " then the original Grey matter must be made vacant yes? Otherwise there would be 2 of the same individual mind ( kinda) we exercise free will so often. That within. Minutes the fake transfered mind will deviate from the exact trajectory its Donor would have had. The first time it makes a decision it's lost it's Fredom from a destiny under its own control. Now just an observer that thinks he's actually driving
It makes sense when you believe in the theory that we are all one consciousness
It is only, still a copy of the mind that is uploaded, not the original consciousness, GPT-3 answered that early on in the conversation.
SOMA
Sign me up. I'm down .
If it where indeed possible to create a perfect copy of an individual's consciousness, this copy is still ultimately a separate entity from the original. If the original consciousness were to be erased or deleted, it would cease to exist, while the copy would continue to function independently. One might reference the classic "Dead Parrot" sketch from Monty Python's Flying Circus as a good fun analogy.
Source: Chatgpt
She is so smart.
If you transfer all the memories and neural connections inside a computer, you have a mental copy of the person, but not the person. They are the same only at the moment of transfer, from that moment on the original person and the computer will live in different situations so they will be different entities
You should have asked it how the process of Consciousness transfer could be completed. If it does not know how the transfer could be facilitated, then the original statement that it knows the transfer could happen is false, because it does not know.
Hi, what about my energetic centers ? Will they be the same ?
What a load of crap.