Dr. Word Person
Historical linguists can reconstruct entire dead languages that have left no written records at all. Are they wizards? No! They just use the comparative method. Watch this video to find out more!
Support me on Patreon! https://www.patreon.com/drwordperson
Follow me on Twitter! https://twitter.com/drwordperson
Further Reading, Etc.:
If you want to learn more about Proto-Indo-European or historical linguistics in general, this is, IMHO, the best introduction for people who have no prior linguistic background. (Not an affilaite link.)
https://www.amazon.com/Indo-European-Language-Culture-Benjamin-Fortson/dp/1405188960
Here are three of the major textbooks on historical linguistics, but you’re probably going to have a rough time if you haven’t already learned phonology and syntax. (Not affilaite links.)
https://www.amazon.com/Historical-Linguistics-Lyle-Campbell/dp/0748646019
https://www.amazon.com/Introduction-Historical-Linguistics-Terry-Crowley/dp/0195365542
https://www.amazon.com/Historical-Linguistics-Twenty-First-Reintegration-Cambridge/dp/0521587115 .
Yay! More videos on comparative linguistics, please!
Proto-Indo-European is no more dead than Latin is. Its descedents have just evolved. But I guess then it depends on how you define dead. Is it like extinction of species in biological evolution? Well there's an identical problem there. Is a species really extinct if its descendents still thrive? Ancient Hebrew is certainly dead, because it had no surviving direct descendents, only surviving cousins.
I suppose you could say that a language is dead because nobody today could understand or communicate with an original speaker of the language, but then we have to talk about unbalanced mutual intelligibility between related languages.
I'd say Proto-Indo-European isn't dead until all it's descendents are. Until then, it's just mostly dead. =)
Disclaimer of course: this is the half-serious opinion of an obvious non-expert.
Could you do a video about the Celtic languages?
I can hear a small but distinct difference in your '-en's and '-in's. It's faint, but it is still there, just not nearly as pronounced as it 'should' be. Or maybe it's just because it's for the camera?π
"Lesbian = dialect spoken on Lesbos
Lesbian /= dialect spoken by lesbians"
ππππβ€π
It sounds like you're saying pin/pan merger. Do you say tin and ten the same too?
Sanskrit is more closely related to slavic languages.
man this channels the best. but when you talk bout your accented spech i was reminded of a question, now i'm not sure if this is right so tell me if i'm wrong but i've gather that a certain english word change from holy day holi day to holiday is that right?
I really loved this video. I read maybe halfway through the book "The Horse The Wheel And Language" (my attention span has fallen off a cliff π) and the detailed description of the way linguists were able to recreate the PIE language was fascinating. Also, your lipstick choices alone are always awesome ππ
Oh, havenβt noticed itβs out
I love how every episode you put in a joke and this one is hilarious π€£
Yeah, you're a wizard, you are! One of these days we need to have a chat, mam. π
A language so dead lol…
As a native Dutch speaker, I've been fascinated by the Afrikaans language and how it's slightly diverging from its ancestral stock, which is a clearly ongoing process, especially with regards to merging phonemes. For instance, Afrikaans has already formalized the "au/ou" merger, which is not reflected in Standard Dutch spelling (yet). However, Afrikaans retains "ei/ui" spelling, even though, to my Dutch ears, it is barely distinguishable anymore in the way they speak over there. In Standard Dutch "ei/ui" are still very distinct.
But do you say βfixing to?β π€
Very useful video thank you!
Are you comedian????? Just asking.