LegalEagle
Maybe A.I. isn’t ready for primetime. 📌 Check out https://legaleagle.link/80000 for free career advice that will change the world from 80,000 Hours.
⚖️ Need a lawyer? Get a FREE consultation with my firm! https://legaleagle.link/eagleteam
⚖️⚖️⚖️ Do you need a great lawyer? I can help! https://legaleagle.link/eagleteam
Welcome back to LegalEagle. The most avian legal analysis on the internets.
🚀 Watch my next video early & ad-free on Nebula! https://legaleagle.link/watchnebula
👔 Suits by Indochino! https://legaleagle.link/indochino
GOT A VIDEO IDEA? TELL ME!
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
Send me an email: devin@legaleagle.show
MY COURSES
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
Interested in LAW SCHOOL? Get my guide to law school! https://legaleagle.link/lawguide
Need help with COPYRIGHT? I built a course just for you! https://legaleagle.link/copyrightcourse
SOCIAL MEDIA & DISCUSSIONS
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
Twitter: https://legaleagle.link/twitter
Facebook: https://legaleagle.link/facebook
Tik Tok: https://legaleagle.link/tiktok
Instagram: https://legaleagle.link/instagram
Reddit: https://legaleagle.link/reddit
Podcast: https://legaleagle.link/podcast
OnlyFans https://legaleagle.link/onlyfans
Patreon https://legaleagle.link/patreon
BUSINESS INQUIRIES
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
Please email my agent & manager at legaleagle@standard.tv
LEGAL-ISH DISCLAIMER
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
Sorry, occupational hazard: This is not legal advice, nor can I give you legal advice. I AM NOT YOUR LAWYER. Sorry! Everything here is for informational purposes only and not for the purpose of providing legal advice. You should contact your attorney to obtain advice with respect to any particular issue or problem. Nothing here should be construed to form an attorney-client relationship. Also, some of the links in this post may be affiliate links, meaning, at no cost to you, I will earn a small commission if you click through and make a purchase. But if you click, it really helps me make more of these videos! All non-licensed clips used for fair use commentary, criticism, and educational purposes. See Hosseinzadeh v. Klein, 276 F.Supp.3d 34 (S.D.N.Y. 2017); Equals Three, LLC v. Jukin Media, Inc., 139 F. Supp. 3d 1094 (C.D. Cal. 2015).
Special thanks:
Stock video and imagery provided by Getty Images and AP Archives
Music provided by Epidemic Sound
Short links by pixelme.me (https://pxle.me/eagle)
Maps provided by MapTiler/Geolayers
⚖ Was I too harsh on these guys?
📌 Check out https://legaleagle.link/80000 for a free career guide from 80,000 Hours!
On the face of it, Mata had those kind of injuries by simply being bumped by an airline cart? What is he (and I use that adjective liberally), made of? Butter? Paper? What exactly? As an actual man I would be embarrassed to have my name attached to something like this.
I don’t know shit about law, so I usually have these videos play as background noise. But ChatGPT? Cmon man even middle schoolers know not to use that 😭
Yeah that's pretty bad. I tried using ChatGPT for a research paper one time and quickly realized it was making up scientific studies when I looked further into it. I can't believe they just took those cases at face value, especially when nothing showed up in a google search. Yikes.
10:26 getting some heavy Kamino vibes right there 😳
😉
And the ad on this video was for ChatGPT.
I just want to know how the original plaintiff did. Did he immediately lose the personal injury case because of his idiot lawyers?
Could you imagine the judge in this case calling up the appeals courts? 😂
Like, yes, hello…this is a judge in NY…ummm…do you guys have any legal opinions you're hiding? 😂
I am a PhD student currently working on building models like ChatGPT, and this is hilarious! Really enjoy all your videos!!!
But this completely makes sense, since these pre-trained models are typically trained on webtext so that they can learn how English (or any other human language), functions, and how to converse in human languages. But these models are not trained on any sort of specialized data for any given field so they won't do well when used for these purposes.
these guys need saul now
yea ai is still going to likely replace lawyers and I doubt it will take that long… gpt = generative pre trained, is generates human like text based on what is was trained on (pre 2021 internet). All you would have to do is make a model that analyzes exclusively laws and legal proceedings, and feed the result into a generative model that only generates based on the output of the analytical model
Argh. This just hurts to watch. I'm not remotely associated with the field of law and I still feel the sting of "secondhanded embarrassment" that your German friend sums up in one word.
The fact that ChatGPT has failed once or twice or three times today does not mean it will not eradicate all paralegals and most attorneys one day. First horses threw riders and injured them, first cars crashed and exploded and were laughed at and first planes definitely killed a lot of early eager pilots. Yet horses were main travel vehicle for a long time only to be replaced by cars and everyone has been on a plane already and very few have died.
Law and order are extremely overcomplicated and obfuscated field and while maintaining it in this state may not be direct result of deliberate effort by judges, prosecutors and attorneys, there is definitely well known and entertained benefit in the legal community from baring mere mortals to enter it and navigate it by themselves.
This all needs to change and it will change.
The Schwartz was not with that lawyer.
ChatGPT is pretty cool if you want to have a conversation with Alexander Hamilton, or any historical figure with an extensive catalog of opinions.
For anyone as curious as I am, I found a couple other interesting things regarding the absolute stupidity of these lawyers:
I tried to find the case that actually has the citation that that one fake case did, 925 F.3d 1339, but the exact citation doesn't have a case linked to it. The closest I could get was 925 F.3d 1291, which is a case regarding abortion rights of all things.
Also, Zicherman v. Korean Air Lines technically does exist, but it dealt with damages surrounding the death of a relative, with nothing in it dealing with a bankruptcy stay.
One of the other fake cases Devin doesn't talk about here manages to misrepresent the real and tragic crash of United Airlines Flight 585, which resulted in the deaths of 25 people. It falsely claimed the airline filed for bankruptcy after the crash, and it lists a former US Attorney General as one of the defendant's attorneys.
Another of the fake cases cited confuses Washington DC with the state of Washington and then cites ITSELF as a precedent.
The final opinion by the judge gets pretty snarky and uses a footnote to quote Alice in Wonderland while describing the ways Schwartz tried to cover his own ass.
In the end, the judge sanctioned everyone involved for $5,000 and made them all write letters to all of the judges identified in the various fake cases.
So… Fremdschämen = cringe ?
“Hey how’s my defense going, am I still going to have to pay that $100 traffic fine?”
“I got us both fined $5000.”
LOL you're being replaced sue that!
It sounds like these guys are millennial type lawyers. No research to back up anything. Always, never forget to do your research.
Dude thinks he's on the enterprise lmao
This is really weird, those names-Susan Verghese, George Scaria Verghese, Anish Verghese….all sound like names belonging to Indian Christians of Malayali extraction.
Malayalis are an ethno-linguistic group who belong to the South Indian state of Kerala. Is it possible ChatGPT stumbled onto some Indian case while trawling the bottom of the inter webz?
"Schwartz was too dumb to be mendacious and LoDuca just wasn't paying attention"
I feel like the only reason these lawyers could be stupid enough to trust chatGPT without further research is because it had worked perfectly before (on multiple occasions that no one will never know of) – for them or unnamed colleagues.
kinda sounds like a (obv dumb) boomer miskate
I like it. But you shout a lot.
The document said that the Zicherman case wasn't located at all but I found it on the Internet
I want a Hollywood movie of this?
i've watched a fair number of his videos.. he kinda makes me wish i had become an attorney lol
Here’s a new German word for you:
Backpfeifengesicht.
Here’s what it means: a face in need of a punch.
Let’s use it in a sentence: these lawyers have a backpfeifengesichte.