Consciousness Videos

Jack Sarfatti – UAPs, Consciousness & Post-Quantum Mechanics



Tim Ventura

Dr. Jack Sarfatti discusses the UAP Phenomenon, Susskind & Maldacena’s ER = EPR conjecture and entanglement, pumped Fröhlich condensates, Penrose & Hameroff’s work in consciousness, and a new approach to open quantum systems in living organisms.

Jack Sarfatti has a Ph.D. in physics from the University of California, taught physics at San Diego State University, worked with David Bohm at the University of London’s Birkbeck College and with Abdus Salam at the International Centre for Theoretical Physics in Trieste, Italy.

Jack was the basis of the memorable time-travelling Dr. Emmett Brown in the Back to the Future trilogy, and the author of Super Cosmos (2005), Destiny Matrix (2002), Space: Time And Beyond II (2002), and the coauthor with Fred Alan Wolf and Bob Toben of Space-Time and Beyond: Toward an Explanation of the Unexplainable (1975).

Source

Similar Posts

35 thoughts on “Jack Sarfatti – UAPs, Consciousness & Post-Quantum Mechanics
  1. ive been watching APEC videos for about two or three weeks straight, and i started out thinking jack sarfotti was a belligerent asshole… but now, i see why everyone lets him run them over. Ive actually started smiling when he talks over people. Hes rude. But hes growing on me. Lol.

  2. Reset Susskind's Conjecture for the Cube in holography to fit flash-fractal In-form-ation substantiation perspectives to i-reflection containment.
    Expect to envision emitter-receiver log-antilog entangled e-Pi-i 1-0-infinity instantaneous holography-quantization in ("Bulk") space filling Singularity-point apparent Centre of Time, Absolute Zero Kelvin eternally, Sublimation-Tunnelling projection-drawing positioning, all Bose-Einsteinian log-antilog matrix Condensation. It looks organic, like the Cosmological Web of 0-1-2-ness log-antilog Red-Blue "plasma", concentric Spheroidal-cylindrical, time-timing sync-duration sync-duration Relativity. (Simple not easy visualisation)

    Just guessing, a Wormhole is related to what a Sound Barrier represents, but the hole in a transverse standing wave modulation requires specif sync-duration timing-phase orthogonal-normal to the picture-plane holographic solid of 1-0 probability of i-reflection rotation, "space-filling", line-of-sight cubics synchronised resonance with sphere in conic-cyclonic=> flash-fractal log-antilog e-Pi-i continuity. "You just look at it".

  3. Jack Sarfatti is the first person I found who can talk about the phenomenon subject in a way that brings genuine scientifically-rigorous insight and which is not full of woo, plus he has connections to so many super important, intelligent, and credible people! This is the level of legitimacy needed to be convincing.

  4. I propose an amended and extended Invisible/Holographic Principle of the Multiverse. A duality within a duality. One duality; the holographic bound and the bulk, works well within our own universe, and the invisible bound, works at another hidden horizon above the holographic cosmic horizon and extends beyond the curtain and into the multiverse. This is where Jack will find the quantum key to the scrambled entanglement on the surface of black holes; a more complete Invisible/Holographic dictionary of quantum cryptography to decipher the hidden entropic entanglement and enter the worm hole.

  5. I think this is edited from past interviews, no?
    I'm amazed at how much I glossed over.Its becaus I'm not so magnificently versed .
    However I'm pleased i can get much from this.
    It's is super real to me to be able to grasp things , some things,
    and use to guide my study
    Thanks Men!.
    Tim I'm so grateful to your interviewing DrJS.
    I'll sit down and watch this again 57 times.
    This is the greatest stuff in the world.

  6. just another materialist by the sound of it. conscious phones and cars? ok good luck with that buddy. also even if it was possible (which it isnt) why would you even want that? give death anxiety and free will to utilities? thats absolutely bonkers.

  7. ..some of these noetic ideas can get a bit carried away for me (invoking dualisms); 'coherence' is not mere interaction but the sharing of unitary quantum states in defiance of ie. fermionic superposition exclusion, combining spins to jump the Pauli barrier, or to isolate shared field properties of aggregate coherent states such as magnons and spinons etc. Are we using quasi-particles for information processing, storage or retrieval?

    It's a god-of-the-gaps argument to try resolve mysteries by consolidating everything intractable into the same basket; i see no reason whatsoever to invoke macroscopic quantum effects in consciousness; on the contrary, from the perspective of the intrinsic nexus between informational and thermodynamic entropies (the real meat and potatoes of any solution to the binding problem) en masse coherences – ie. precipitous drops in system entropy – would by definition represent a decrease in information density, processing load and conscious awareness. The effect we experience as the equivalence of octaves is, i believe, representative of a critical emergent bandwidth that is the closest thing in consciousness to a coherent quantum state, yet this is more 'analogue' than quantum processing; we resolve and integrate information via a process of entropy-reduction to a thermodynamically-efficient solution, per Shannon, Boltzmann and Landauer etc. Efficiency itself is the processor, and octave equivalence is the experience of a fundamental thermal / informational axis inherent to this form of multicellular processing.

    Consciousness is primarily concerned with processing meta-information – ie. information about the objective, corporeal stuff, the map of the territory.. so not threatening the time-conservation of fundamental (irreducible) information, forgotten information not violating the no-hiding theorem. It's reactive and observant, but not proactive in terms of constituting a first cause or causality violation.

    The relationships between ER and EPR as implied by the alien psychotronic techs may be incidental cross-over between two completely independent technology bases, rather than evidence of intrinsically-shared elements. For example we know that warp fields can be projected as beams – i've previously shared video here of mini-UAP clearly producing these warp-tunnels as evinced by distinct lensing of background imagery ahead in their direction of acceleration, as well as video examples of mechanical interaction at distance (happy to repost); such techs might conceivably be combined or modulated with other carrier / field properties specifically targetting say the corticothalmic networks with ultrasound or playing discrete cortical neurons with intricate phased-array EMFs at the 'machine code' level (again, assuming they've long-since cracked the binding problem, which may have universal applicability in relation to chemically-fuelled multicellular processing per se). Or to put it another way just because trans-cranial magnetic stimulation has repeatable effects, this doesn't necessarily imply there's much to be learned about 'the stuff of information', sensation or sentience in terms of Maxwellian theory..

    But if i'm certain of nothing else, it's that a post-singularity ETC – not least a telepathic one – will have few illusions re. the nature of free will, much less the supposed primacy of consciousness, which i see only as an increasingly-cultish shibboleth mutated from classic misapprehension of the DSE results, now laid rest by modern QIT per Zeilinger et al. From the few available accounts, getting hit with a warp-beam can indeed be an enlightening, Damascene experience – seeing the moon or starfield magnified via a warped perspective of scale and distance might quite understandably be trippy as hell, and epistemological shock is arguably its own kind of transcendence – but anything else we wanna read into it is all on us, IMHO.. 'mind', i'm quite sure, is nothing more or less than the activity of brain, and psychotronic techs must exploit this determinacy. There's one particular case i find especially mind-boggling here, where the witness first saw a bright white light approaching at low height; as it passed overhead he waved up at it, then experienced an OOBE as he looked down at himself waving up at himself..! I can't know if it's true of course (again, happy to repost sources) but there seems a lot to unpack there in terms of the whole ER / EPR issue..

  8. If anyone is interested in Hamerofs refutation of the Italian experiment it is below.

    TLDR: the experiment he believes was junk and conducted by Max Tegmarks group whom if you know the history has tried to harpoon the Orch OR theory from the get go. It is timestamped.

    https://youtu.be/PxZNQBFtRx4

  9. Tim keep this channel going it is a matter of time before it blows up.

    And please for the love of God start conducting more debates/discussions between scientists.

    My vote, jack sarfatti and hamerof.

  10. 13;28 Lenny's Big Mistake. SR only works with no gravity. Living matter = open systems, living matter = meta material, we are room temperature super conductors, we are pumped ''long range coherent Frolisch condensates. 26;18 artificial microtubules. Humanizing robots. 30;07 ER=EPRis PQM, action – reaction. living matter is non unitary. 31;00 we are open systems, decrease of entropy, we create information and lose information to them outside. That is telepathy!

  11. Thank you, Tim Ventura, am not surprised to hear Sir Roger Penrose in 2020 did not have unity physics, describing the consciousness to spirit. Is just math of energy at transfer, amazing.

  12. Is a lot to pack in Jack Sarfatti. g = G Me/r^2(1e-/+Ef/Eo)
    Me-x.y,z Ef-x,yz Eo-x,y,z 9 Planes
    Use 12 Planes, Eo1 – x,y,z H2O r < c, Eo2 – x,y,z H2O r > c
    Powering energy transfer of manifest reality by the trinity of universal mass.
    r > c, r = c, r < c immersed in neutrinos, a content of Infinity. Unite GR -/+ QM = 1
    Have unification of thermodynamics begins a 0 K.

  13. Awesome show Tim as usual you do great stuff.
    Question for Jack…
    If an entangled object enters a transversible wormhole what happens to both from the perspective of each and a perspective of someone viewing them locally.
    I understand it seems you are saying communication stops but does the actual entanglement stop?
    Is the entanglement itself a form of communication?
    Does the connection break?

    Thanks Jack and Tim.

Comments are closed.

WP2Social Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com