Unbelievable?
FULL DEBATE https://youtu.be/mongL_2KMGg
For more debates, updates and bonus content sign up at https://www.thebigconversation.show/
High profile atheist philosopher Daniel C Dennett goes head to head with Christian theologian Keith Ward in this extract from their debate on mind, consciousness and freewill.
In this excerpt Dennett and Ward debate the source of moral values.
The Big Conversation is a unique video series from Unbelievable? featuring world-class thinkers across the Christian and atheist community. Exploring science, faith, philosophy and what it means to be human.
Listen to more sparkling conversations every week via the Unbelievable? podcast http://www.premierchristianradio.com/…
The Big Conversation series:
Jordan Peterson & Susan Blackmore https://youtu.be/syP-OtdCIho
Steven Pinker & Nick Spencer https://youtu.be/Ssf5XN5o9q4
Derren Brown & Rev Richard Coles https://youtu.be/IxMLwQToAKo
John Lennox & Michael Ruse https://youtu.be/yrnXdzQRISM
Daniel Dennett & Keith Ward – https://youtu.be/mongL_2KMGg
Peter Singer & Andy Bannister – https://youtu.be/JiM8ul3oRxE
The Big Conversation is produced by Premier in partnership with the Templeton Religion Trust
Videos, updates, exclusive content https://www.thebigconversation.show/
Source
It’s been 2500 years since the death of Aristotle, are we seriously still using his method of proving things?! That kind of logic is all dead with the birth of Kant , the existence of God is not something which can be known , get over it
Im sorry Mr Ward, but quantum worlds are no more ‘made up’ than the Higgs Boson is made up. The possibility of quantum worlds is entailed by the mathematics, the possible existence of god is not. It’s that straightforward, that simple.
JB, you've already answered….no need to answer again. Christians out there. What is you best objective, positive evidence for the Christian God?
Plz we want jordan again !!!!
If you want to talk about the Christian God, that is the definition. Saying you just defined it that way, is like saying I called you what you are. If you're a horse, I would define you as such. It would be wrong to call you a cow if you were a horse. I cannot just randomly choose to redefine you as a cow. It causes confusion.
Like if you said atheism was not being sure if there is a God. That is not what atheism means, even if you personally modify it. Your beliefs may be more nuanced than a general title, but it modifies you, not the other way around.