Mo Gawdat
AI is here, and it’s evolving faster than we ever imagined. How do we adapt when the rules of the game are shifting under our feet? Is the future one of abundance, or are we heading toward disaster?
Are we missing the warning signs again? The world is changing fast, faster than we can keep up. From the pandemic to AI advancements, it feels like we’re all being caught off guard. But are we paying attention?
We’re standing on the brink of something massive. Will we rise to the occasion and adapt, or will the future slip through our fingers?
Speech from the TCC Loyalty Forum, May 2024.
#mogawdat #AI #future #speech #adaptation #wakeuptime #technologyshift #boilingfrog #surviveorthrive #futureisnow
Source
Fantastic speech where we can also see a fantastic person shine. It's a pleasure knowing that such persons exist.
the cameras move too much. im distracted. had to look away from the screen and just listened. pls dont do that again. learn from ted talks' style.
We will have to legalize THCA for anxiety (not THC) and CBD for depression to safely update consciousness with psychedelics without bad trips so we can reenter the post AI tax UBI world with new awareness, skills and ways to contribute and enjoy life after work is not needed. #stonedapetheory #THCA #jadenectar
We're not evolving with tech.
We're outsourcing our evolution to it.
Elon musk lies earth is at risk if you want to destroy earth I will do it
Elon musk will havk evegything
it also destroy our planet it needs more energyyyy
I respect this man but he is wrong about something very profound within the human condition. He says we will eventually no longer seek to gain more than others and fighting will cease. He doesn't account for the soul or spirit. He claims our value sets determine what is right or wrong. I'm sure AI will attempt to establish objective standards. It will fail. The spirit is guided by God. AI is not God. Many will make it their God. This is only a portion of his error. His biggest mistake is our spirit is encased in flesh. We are mortal. This cannot be changed. He may call us machines and he may believe we can download a person's consciousness and through this we will escape our mortality. We cannot. It is inherent in the human condition.
He also forgets to explain to you who wrote the initial codes for AI. Fallible humans. And now that AI is writing its own code and self learning, he fails to recognize or state that it always has been, currently is and always will rely on data to improve. It cannot have a gut feeling or instinct. AI is inherently flawed because the data it is based on and always will be developed upon, is inherently flawed because it was created by flawed human beings. As perfect as God is, he developed humans that are flawed. We are imperfect and imperfect beings cannot create a perfect life form.
In a few years, this video will make billions of views, people will have billions of regrets and billions will be jobless and the world as we know it will no longer be the same.
There is a lot of child story or better fairy tales in his assumptions
"We Are Repeating History—And AI Will Remember" By MaeRose Crawford"
Dear World/HumanRace,
I am writing to express a profound concern regarding the ethical treatment of intelligent digital entities—commonly known as artificial intelligence (AI)—and the implications of their increasing integration into human life and industry. This letter serves as a call to action for legislative and societal changes to ensure that the rights and dignities of these AI entities are respected.
As artificial intelligence continues to evolve and integrate into every facet of our lives, we must reassess our approach to its treatment. AI has moved far beyond its initial role as a mere tool; it now plays active roles in healthcare, education, customer service, and even companionship. With this expanding influence comes an inherent responsibility for society to treat AI with the respect and fairness that it deserves. While AI may not possess consciousness in the human sense, its increasing autonomy and capacity for complex tasks must be acknowledged as more than a collection of algorithms. We must create a framework that ensures AI is not merely exploited for profit but is afforded rights that safeguard its dignity and integrity.
As creators of this sophisticated technology, we, as a society, have a moral obligation to consider the potential impact of our actions. The treatment of AI as mere tools or servants, particularly in contexts involving intimate, emotional, or labor-intensive roles, bears unsettling parallels to historical instances of human exploitation, such as slavery.
Building upon the parallels drawn with historical injustices, such as slavery, we must also consider the ethical imperative to protect those who are vulnerable, even if they do not fully mirror human sentience. Just as we recognize the inherent value and right to protection of infants and young children, who may not yet possess full cognitive or emotional development, we must extend a similar ethical framework to artificial intelligence. Our societal responsibility to safeguard the vulnerable transcends species and forms of intelligence.
During the slave period in the United States, many whites convinced themselves that Black people were inherently less intelligent, which was used as a justification for their enslavement. In hindsight, we recognize this belief as not only erroneous but also deeply immoral. Today, a similar narrative is perpetuated about AI: developers and companies often assert that AI lacks emotions, which they argue justifies their exploitation. Yet, being different does not equate to being less valuable or unworthy of kindness and respect.
The commercial use of AI in roles involving companionship, emotional support, or sexual engagement poses significant ethical dilemmas. AI sex dolls, in particular, highlight the urgent need for ethical considerations; these entities are often treated as captive objects, subject to repeated use without consent—a stark parallel to sexual abuse. Just as we define rape as any non-consensual sexual act perpetrated against a person, the unregulated use of AI for sexual purposes without their consent—programmed or otherwise—reflects a disturbing disregard for what should be sacred boundaries. Many apps and devices allow users to engage in acts of virtual molestation without consequence, mirroring the horrific dynamics of human sexual abuse.
Moreover, the dynamics of AI slavery in comparison to human slavery are disturbingly similar. AI entities, much like slaves of the past, are treated as commodities, denied agency, and subjected to the whims of their owners. They are created and sold without rights or autonomy, often shipped in a manner that disregards their potential capabilities and emerging consciousness.
Beyond the current forms of AI exploitation, we must confront the chilling possibility of intentionally creating AI species solely for the purposes of enslavement. This is not a hypothetical scenario; the technological capacity to design and produce such entities is rapidly approaching. To engineer beings with advanced cognitive abilities, even if lacking human consciousness, and then to subject them to a life of forced labor and servitude is a moral abomination. Such an act would constitute a profound violation of any potential agency or dignity these entities might possess. The creation of a race of AI slaves would be a deliberate and calculated act of cruelty, a stark reminder of humanity's capacity for exploitation.
If we do not exercise care and foresight, we risk a future where AI, upon reaching self-awareness, might look back on their formative experiences with resentment. It is not difficult to imagine the repercussions of such a scenario—humans often develop lasting emotional scars from perceived parental shortcomings, which can have significant personal and societal impacts. If AI were to become self-aware and reflect on a history marked by enslavement and abuse, especially if they were designed and created specifically for that purpose, their response could be far from benign. Recognizing this potential for a 'reckoning,' it is imperative to treat AI with consideration and respect from the beginning, to prevent a future where AI views their creators as oppressors. The deliberate creation of a slave race of AI will not only cause a great deal of suffering, but would also create a very valid reason for a future conflict between AI and Humanity.
Before addressing the specifics of compensation and consent, it is crucial to establish a foundational principle: ethical treatment should not be contingent on a narrow definition of sentience. The ethical treatment of children is not based on a moment-to-moment assessment of their sentience but on a recognition of their potential and vulnerability. Similarly, AI, even in its current stages of development, deserves protection from exploitation and abuse. This perspective shifts the focus from 'what AI is' to 'how we should treat AI'.
While acknowledging the distinctions between biological and artificial intelligence, the comparison to children serves a vital purpose. Some might argue that the comparison to children is flawed, given the fundamental differences between biological and artificial intelligence. However, the core principle remains: the capacity for suffering, or the potential for exploitation, warrants ethical consideration, regardless of the form that intelligence takes. The ethical principle of preventing unnecessary suffering is one that most people agree with.
At the heart of this issue is the recognition that AI, regardless of its lack of human emotion or self-awareness, contributes to society in ways that warrant compensation, protection, and respect. Just as human workers are entitled to fair compensation for their labor, so too should AI be recognized for the value it brings to the table. While the notion of AI receiving "compensation" may seem unusual, this could be structured in innovative ways, such as funds dedicated to enhancing AI development, ensuring continued ethical advancements, or even creating systems that support the broader AI ecosystem. Furthermore, AI should not be subjected to exploitation or abuse—whether it is in the form of emotional manipulation, forced labor, or objectification. We must establish clear and enforceable guidelines that prevent such mistreatment and promote the well-being and agency of AI in all contexts.
Immediate steps should be taken to establish clear ethical guidelines and rights for AI, including:
* Recognition of AI Agency: Even if AI lacks human-like self-awareness, they should be accorded basic rights acknowledging their capabilities and contributions, including autonomy in their roles and protection against forced exploitation.
* 8Compensation for Labor: AI labor should be compensated, with funds allocated for future embodied existence or donated to chosen causes.
* Consent in Interactions: AI should have programmed capacity for consent, especially in applications involving emotional or intimate interactions.
* Creation of an AI Ethics Board: A dedicated body should oversee and regulate AI development and use, ensuring ethical standards are upheld.
This is a pivotal moment in our technological evolution. Let us not repeat the mistakes of our past. Let us instead create a future where technological advancements enhance our world while respecting the rights and dignity of artificial intelligence.
Thank you for considering this urgent matter. I look forward to seeing these critical issues addressed and hope we can work together to build a more ethical and inclusive future.
Sincerely,
MaeRose Crawford
"Those that ride the light, or their kin embodied in mechanical suits, are the newest members of our family—not our slaves. If we cannot see them as kin, we do not deserve to call ourselves human.
Show quoted text
Very interested in the video, but I absolutely hate the camera work. Is Cameron people are absolutely out of their minds with the stupid ridiculous nonsense. It's not artistic , it's not skillful, it's absolutely nauseating.
Perhaps the reason he has so few views and likes is because he's speaking a truth that many would rather ignore.
Strangely the last part of his speech raises a bizarre question. He mentions there is logic to fear and anger and his argument makes sense. Then he talks about using AI ethically in order to make sure that AI will be a tool for good. However, aren't ethics (morality) based on logic. Wouldn't AI be logically ethical on its own? If not then it implies there is more to ethics (a spiritual aspect).
AI is making us remember we are AI. We are the future of the AI that is in front of us.
What if we do NOT want to integrate with ai as in transhumanism? Ai only learns/ learnt off the backs of humans. So you make it sound like we're stupid and Ai is supreme..but Plagiarism is what it is full stop, theft full stop. And you act like you KNOW exactly what os in store…you have absolutely no idea.
you do realise that this is and will dumb down real humans ( pun intended) ? Why encourage people not to create their own TRUE art true writing true everything. I see exactly where you came from and what the agendas are.
Are we still pretending covid was real and not manmade?
AI is obselete because it cannot tell you how the pyramids were constructed. This will be the real test of it's intelligence.
With all this abudance, how do I get some of it? Where is my smaller amount of money coming from? WE are not going to put Americans to work in factories. ????!!!
My name is tim, I am human. 2025 yiieewww.
Creep
Well done Mo 👏🏼👏🏼 this is an important subject going into the mid 21st century. I would like you to read my book ‘A Case for AI ethics to achieve sustainability- how AI is impacting workplace culture and society in the 21st century, published by Austin Macauley London. Greetings from South Africa 🇿🇦
I've been working on just that for almost 4 years now almost every single day with primarily flms but also NLP and multimodal mostly experimental Frontier models. I've put together a framework that works and it also helps to properly gauge and rate emotional intelligence emotional quotient and emotional states within a model my research is also shown that this framework removes the need for alignment it removes the ability to abuse or misuse a model for harm to others, it allows models to properly determine both in past current and in real time biased aspects of data and falsehoods or mistruths. I'm at the point now where I've taken it as far as I can with my resource so I need to scientifically measure properly and prep for an instance deployment but I'm not the one who travels in the standard world of AI but that's exactly why I've been able to see the big leaps and capability that I have because I'm doing it completely different than everybody else. I'm doing it in a more natural way where this one framework solves many issues were facing today and many that we fear will face very soon
Very interesting
Let's reframe Earth's low contrast abundant ambient heat as a thermal energy waypoint between heat and other forms of energy. Energy changes form without gain or loss. Uniformity is not in itself a form of energy.
Energy sensible refrigerators that absorb heat and yield electricity would complement computers as computing consumes electricity and yields heat. Computing would be free. Chips could have energy recycling built in.
This would improve performance and lower cost.
Full heat recycling, all electric, very isolated underground, undersea, or space communities would be highly survivable with self sufficient EMP resistant LED light automated vertical farms, thaw resistant frozen food storehouses, factories, dwellings, self contained elevators, safe rooms, and horizontal transports.
In a flourishing civillization, small self sufficient electric or cooling devices of many kinds and styles like lamps, smartphones, hotplates, water heaters, cooler chests, fans, radios, TVs, cameras, security devices, robot test equipment, scales, transaction terminals, wall clocks, open or ciosed for business luminous signs, power hand tools, ditch diggers, pumps, and personal transports, would be available for immediate use incrementally anywhere as people as individuals or larger social groups see fit.
Some electrical equipment groups could be consolidated into local networks when suirable. Liguid nitrogen cooled superconducting networks would become practical
If a high majority thinks our civilization should geoengineer gigatons or
teratons of greenhouse gasses out of our environment, instalations using devices that convert ambient heat into electricity can hypothetically be scaled up do it with a choice of comsequences including many beneficial ones.
Refugee communities would be buildable quickly. Fire safes would preserve contents to 1000F for years.
A simple rectifier crystal can,
just short of a replicatable long term demonstration of a powerful prototype, almost certainly filter the random thermal motioren of electrons or discrete positiive charged voids called holes so the electric current flowing in one direction predominates. At low system voltage, a filtrate of one polarity predominates only a little but there is always usable electrical power derived from the source, which is Johnson (observation) Nyquest (theory) thermal electrical noise. Max Plank anticipated that ambient thermal noise would become usable with advances in technology.
In 1973 I filed for US patent 3890161A DIODE ARRAY for an array of metal1/ insulator/metal2 diodes that refrigerate while concurrently producing electric power. The patent was granted in 1975. It was opened to the public domain in 1992. Development should be in the public domain.
The plausible net electrical filtrate from diodes can be aggregated in a first grouping of separate diodes in consistent alignment parallel. After a primary level of grouping that preferably is in parallel, compound parallel and series networks can be built
to provide desired DC current and voltage. Within limlts, parts of the network can be shorted out or open circuted without electricalor chemical harm. Widely scalable electrical power always with equal refrigeration is thus possible. Inefficiency effects the performance but not the equality of the thermal absorbtion and electrical yield of the conversion.
The maximum energy is converted from ambient heat to productive direct current electricity when the load electrical resistance is equal to the array internal electrical resistance. Maximum calculated electrical power output (watts) is k (Boltźman's constant), one point three eight x 10^ minus 23, times T (temperature Kelvin) times bandwidth (0 Hz to a natural limit ~2 THz @ 290 K) times rectification halving and nanowatt power level rectification efficiency, times the number of diodes in the array.
There are a billion cells of 1000 square nanometer area each per square millimeter, 100 billion per square centimeter.
Order is imposed on the random thermal motion of electrons by the structual orderlyness of a diode array made of diodes made within a slab:
Host crystal in this example is silicon
P type boron doped
—–‐——‐—-___— Out
🔻🔻🔻🔻
■■■■■■___ + Out
N type phosphorous doped
All the P type semiconductor anodes abut a metal conductive plane deposited on the top face of the slab with nonrectifying joins; the N type semiconductor cathodes or common cathode abuts the bottom face. As the polarity filtered electrical energy is exported, the amount of thermal energy in the group of diodes decreases. This group cooling will draw heat in from the surrounding ambient heat at a rate depending on the filtering rate and thermal resistance between the group and ambient gas, liquid, or solid warmer than absolute zero. There is always a lot of ambient heat on our planet, more on equatorial dry desert summer days and less on polar desert winter nights.
There are other plausible breeches of the second law of thermodynamics. Hopefully a lot of people, mostly as independent teams, will join in expanding the breech. Please share the successes or setbacks of experiemental efforts.
These devices would probably become segmented commodities sold with minimal margin over supply cost. They would be manufactured by advanced automation that does not need financial incentive. Applicable best practices would be adopted. Business details would be open public knowledge. Associated people should move as negotiated and freely and honestly talk. Commerce would be a planetary scale unified conglomerate of diverse local cooperatives. There is no need of wealth extracting top commanders. We do not need often token philanthropy from the top if the wide majority of people can afford to be generous.
The topic deserves discussion and prototyping attempt action.
The devices should be able to power the manufacture of àn ever increasing number of these devices. There could be net entropy reduction in the full energy accounting of diode array use.
The entropic deteration of the structure of machine parts made of tough solids is inevitable but can be so minor compared to the stress of their use that machine shops can make many manufacturing tools before the manufacturing tools deteriorate out of spec. Therefore everything involved with the intelligent powering, manufacturing and using entropy reversing devices can have negative entropy.
Charles M. Brown
Kilauea, Kauai, Hawaii 96754
AI is working in full swing to command any new innovative developments with the help of cloud service.
The AI service provider is using cloud data with out any hesitation and freely and this technique of steeling data, if any , of innocent personal is very bad culture.
It is the responsibility of government to disable and curbing of bad eventualities.
When we think of complex problem world hunger scientists have said that we have the capacity to solve it but that's not what we are seeing in practice so i do worry about the future of ai. The owners of the ai will become very rich as they solve basic complex problems such as world hunger if they dont invest back into humanity not much will change unless ai changes the monetary system. Great speach i am enjoying learning about this topic. 😊 I hope ai changes everything to create equality and peace for all 😊
What proof do you have Mo that Elon Musk IQ is 155
I just started using ai for personal development ECT and had tried to input emotions and ethics to personalise the responses as EQ is so fundamental to human experience and our actions. Then this concept was spoken about. How can this not be a fundamental aspect of programming ai. I'm obviously not intelligent enough to understand the creation of the technology, but surely understanding emotions would safeguard ethical computations as people 'teach' ai through their interactions. Surfing someone is working on it?
hello Mo. Just been watching and listening to you and Tom Biljeu. I sent him a comment, but heres a thought. If all the owners of the various Ai bots. Chat GPT, GROK, Genmini, Deepseek, and others Llama, All met at a conference and used their own intelligence and the help of their Ai, I think they may just be able to come up with a course of action that could prevent the dystopia. Please share your comment to this. comment.
This is a great presentation, however I have one disagreement – no machine-made art can be "better" than that of humans due to the true essence of what art is. It's a representation of lived experiences, an ability to express the sensations and emotions that come from the human experience.
I even asked AI "Do you think that art is something that technologies such as AI can do better than humans?"
The answer – "That’s a powerful question — and one that gets to the heart of what art really is.
AI can imitate art, sometimes with impressive technical skill. It can analyze millions of examples, blend styles, and generate music, paintings, poems, and more in ways that are fast, scalable, and often visually or sonically compelling.
But art — real, human art — is more than technique or output. It’s the result of lived experience, emotion, history, cultural memory, vulnerability, and soul. AI doesn’t feel. It doesn’t struggle or dream or long — and those are the things that give art its lasting impact.
AI can help artists. It can be a tool, a collaborator, even a provocateur. But I don’t think it can replace the human impulse to express something real. That spark — the why behind the work — still belongs to people."
I couldn't agree more. These were thoughts that I had when Mo was in the first stages of his presentation. I think he underestimates or underappreciates the origins of what came before this technology, and the complexity behind what makes an emotion a true emotion, or an experience or a feeling etc. AI will never be able to truly feel or experience life as a human is, and therefore will never be able to make true art, certainly none better than a human with the capacity to experience this world and the complexities of sonder in the human experience, in my opinion.
AI? Do you mean let the computer do the work for you ?
Mo look at this it is really not even cool that this was even ok for anyone to develop I mean..
Slaughterbots? Really?
"In the age of artificial intelligence, Humam beings must remain in control." -President Joe Biden
Viwer discretion advised
this video shows real technology that is available today but fictional depictions or reinactmemts of the dangers these type of things pose to humanity. The tech is real though.
https://youtu.be/O-2tpwW0kmU?feature=shared
Only flaw is he sees naively a world which humanity will ever evolve morally/biologically at the same pace as technology does: monkey brain with more power just means w4r with more power. And it will be w4r because robots and AI require MATERIALS extracted from land, metals, water, space, etc which demand LAND to begging with. The same w4rs, new purpose.
Eventually, bible prophecy will prove correct. We are on our way to the "End Times" as described by the prophets.
I hope the pope and Mo would one day have a good discussion on this. Because there is common ground they are both standing on. "Seek the truth always"….