scienceandnonduality
The nature of the mind and the subjective experience remain great challenges in modern science and philosophy. Neuroscience assigns mental activity to physical process. This has yielded little in the actual understanding of the mind. Relying on physicalist assumptions actually assumes a world view put to rest by quantum theory more than 80 years ago.
What I propose is an uncompromising view of the fundamental nature of underlying consciousness, the source of the mind. It is based on the “amazing hypothesis”, reality is amazing because at some levels is very simple, while at the same time mysterious. The universe is much richer than our perceptions tell us, infinitely so. Perception limits what we view as reality because it depends on our senses, our own specific environment in our own planetary system, our own species. It is a prism that distorts underlying reality.
This underlying reality is universal Consciousness, which operates at every level of existence of the universe, the physical, the mental, the beyond. It is founded on the fundamentalI awareness, which is the true Self. The Self projects the universe out of its own infinite existence, through a series of fundamental principles, which apply at all levels, by first separating Itself from Itself, in what appear as infinite numbers of objects. However, it never loses its own I-ness. In the unfoldment of the universe, qualia, the collection of vast numbers of subjective experiences, play a fundamental role, for all species, of all individual organisms. Perception is based on qualia, perception is in fact qualia.
The sages of ancient monistic schools, the philosophers, taught through practical steps the experience of the Self. Its names are infinite, its nature mysterious because it can never be studied through perception or through the mind. But it is the one, amazing truth: The creative process can be experienced in one’s own being. The Self should be understood and experienced as the ultimate Witness Consciousness. In this vision, the Universe is participatory, consisting of countless acts of observation, forming a web of entangled processes at all levels, obeying fundamental principles which the Self utilizes in the creative process. The new, emerging science will be seen as Observer-based Science, distinguishing it, but complementary to, current Object-based Science.
MENAS KAFATOS
Professor of Computational Physics and Director of Excellence at Chapman University
Dr. Menas Kafatos is The Fletcher Jones Endowed Professor of Computational Physics and Director of Excellence at Chapman University. He received his B.A. in Physics from Cornell University in 1967 and his Ph.D. in Physics from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 1972. After postdoctoral work at NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, he joined George Mason University and was University Professor of Interdisciplinary Sciences there from 1984-2008. He has authored and co-authored numerous books including The Conscious Universe, The Non-local Universe and Principles of Integrative Science. He is a recipient of the Rustum Roy Award from the Chopra Foundation, which “honors individuals whose devotion and commitment to their passion for finding answers in their field is matched only by their commitment to humanity” and the IEEE Orange County Chapter – Outstanding Leadership and Professional Service Award. He has been interviewed numerous times by national and international TV networks, newspapers and radio programs.
http://chapman.edu/CS/pcse/faculty/kafatos.asp
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Menas_Kafatos
Source
The phrase “There is only one observer” , for me, is the gateway to unfolding the meaning of this talk.
If there are two observers, that would reduce down to the illusion of two distinct realities only one of which can be “true”
Reality 1- materialist science.
Dogma = Consciousness is an illusion created by meat machines (the body/brain). Only matter is real.
Reality 2 – Consciousness is all that is
The primary reality is consciousness. Matter = Energy = Information.
Information requires the complementary of consciousness to have meaning.
Objective science is conducted in consciousness (how could it be otherwise) therefore as the speaker points out, objective science is a subset of subjective science.
Everything and nothing.
Every mental activity that neuroscience assigns it to as a physical process leads to an outcome in the form of a subjective experience is in turn due to certain neuro chemicals that are released in the brain . But what is not understood and science too has been unable to explain is how exactly a specific neuro chemical causing a physical process is related to a particular experience .
If reality is memory based, it is necessary to understand what is memory .
Observer based science?. It is memory based science. Time and space and all incidents are only in memory. Memory of whom? The universe consciosness, some call God and some call the Source. There is nothing outside the memory. A subset of the memory groups together becomes an individual memory. Life may be a form of memory creation process.
Wonderfully clear audio on this upload. Thanks!
In reality consciousness is both …
~ The physical and non physical
~ The internal and the external
~ The seen and the unseen
~ The local and the non local
Ultimately reducing to the particle and the wave ~~~
Philosophies like Vedanta, Shaivism, Buddhism, Confucianism and Platonism are derived from expanded states of awareness ~ States in which qualities of consciousness are transformed into qualia experiences ~
~ One thing I would like to point out is ~ If you want to understand consciousness ~ Then you need to understand the properties of a wave ~ Because a wave has the same properties as consciousness ~
~ One thing I would like to point out is ~ It’s our perspective that limits our perception of reality ~ What modern science needs to understand ~ Is the wave activity behind the physical processes ~ We happen to live in a dynamic universe ~ Where expansion and contraction is a fundamental part ~ That effects every state of consciousness ~ I would also like to point out that this expansion and contraction is a wave function ~ So why is modern science still looking for particles ~ When they should be looking at waves ~
Right on man! Hey, I didn't know they legalized marijuana in California already. Someone's been smoking, I think.
Although it is still only in its infancy, as the universe continues to "reveal itself" to us, I believe that an observer-based science will most likely become THE science of the (not too distant) future. It seems to me that, at some point, the materialists are going to have to concede that their worldview is merely a subset of a broader superset. Cheers.
Cool. Thanks!
I loved this lecture when I was in San Jose in October this year.
40:43 is a picture of StLucia's Piton peaks. 🙂
Thank you.