Observer Effect – We are Living in a Probability Based Reality

31 thoughts on “Observer Effect – We are Living in a Probability Based Reality”

1. Does this mean that when I’m viewing any internal portion of my apartment, and at most I can only see 150 sq/ft, that the other 700 is only probably there? I wonder if I can use this to argue for a rent deduction based on the reality of fewer observable sq feet, and the other sq feet not being part of our reality.

2. Thank you <3

3. Pseudoscience this guy has no real understanding of what the experiment was and the results can not be predicted. Get a real Quantum Physicist he will just feel disappointed this even exist.

4. I am an artist from Germany and am concerned a lot with colors and shapes and art in general but this topic is extremely important and very interesting for me, thank you for your work on understanding reality and all that. I've been dealing with this consciousness, philosophy and reality for a while now, I avoid many ingredients such as fluoride, sugar and organic/animal milk. Meditate 3 to 4 times a week. I notice a change in myself objectively through perceptions and mentally/in thought processes. When meditating, I see colors and fractal-like shapes in a calm state. When I take a walk outside and focus on one point, I suddenly see dancing, vibrating balls of light or energy that seem to come from all over the earth. It's unclear to me what I see there and I'm skeptical.

   Greetings 👋

5. I really struggle with this,,,it's counter-intuitive. I wouldn't be surprised if they discover they've been missing something all along..

6. This is how to see the black Cupid hologram.
   Concentrate.

   SEEING THE INVISIBLE WALL of the cuboid hologram.
   https://youtu.be/xNO2TZknrVc

7. “Life happened because people made measurements.”

8. We are living in a precise directional based reality, yes slightly inclined and with the possibility of alteration

9. In my probable universe Tom had work done on his face

10. Your theory of everything is solid and most likely correct. It resonates. I'm a big fan. But I think your opinion on love being the answer is incorrect. The answer is balance. Take some time to study Walter Russell. Rhythmic balanced interchange. I think he may help unlock some more for you, and perhaps get you where you want to be when it comes to exposure.

    And do what you gotta do to get on Joe Rogan's podcast!

11. Not true that conscious observer is required. Just an interaction with (measuring) instruments or even other(…) is enough.

12. So when multiple IUCs are "seeing" the same thing, it's a collective "answer" from a collective probability? Otherwise it means everyone sees their own reality…but that doesn't make sense. There is a rule set and there must be factors that impact that probability.

13. What if AI made the measurement 🤔

14. Yeah well. Plato was the first to explain this. Although, the original story was in the Epic of Gilgamesh.
    Possibly best know as the Eleusinian Mystery Ritual but people have been doing OOBE's for millennia.
    In JC's time it was Resurrection.
    How does it work? Why worry?
    As Shakespeare said, "All the world's a stage. And in his time, every man has many parts".
    (He was a Roscrucian).
    Why? It's obvious. To combat entropy by evolving.

15. Audio only plays in the left channel on this video

16. 5:58 So if the photons don't interact with each other how do they create an interference pattern?

17. Wouldn’t that also mean that the human body isn’t there unless it is being observed by another conscious body? Meaning when the body goes to sleep, assuming the person is alone. Does the body exist? Or does it come back into existence upon waking up?

18. Is it only humans that affect the reality or do other animals?

19. I thought a measurement without consciousness does the same.

20. Thank you Tom for your tireless work spanning over 50 years! How you have held down a very responsible job working for NASA, raised a family, written a very complex and informative trilogy, worked with Bob Monroe in your 'spare time' for years, travelled the World giving long structured lectures on your work, answering thousands of questions over and over again whilst always remaining calm, kind, informative and thoughtful in your response and on top of all that making over a thousand YouTube videos, writing another book , Tom's Park, and I believe you are working on yet another book whilst organising these experiments!!! How do you do it?

    I know why you do it; yes, maybe you were born to it but, like you always say, you still had a CHOICE. You could have had a very successful life as a NASA Scientist and raising your beautuful family, but you decided to take the hard road, the road that would best serve mankind. It would entail great sacrifice and a work ethic far surpassing even the imagination of most of us.
    A humble THANK YOU for your amazing, lifelong contribution to the nature of our reality 🙏. Those of us fortunate enough to have found you, have found a different way to live. Yes, we still have to do the work, but you gave us a compass and a map to travel this life and to one day find our way home, what better gift could you give to mankind.

21. Min. 1-11 – Tom, Would you pls. once elaborate on their 'probability function' conclusion, and whether this was correct from today's view. For their is a fundamental issue coming with it – any probability function reflects a closed sample space, regardless how many (almost endless but never endless !) events it may contain – meaning that the virtual world we live in is still deterministic..

22. Clearly Tom is on another level. Thank God

23. Proof this is all just an Illusion

24. Sadly Tom has a very Rigid view of reality. he would be a much different individual if he were to experience the altered lens that a psychedelic provides. There's a dryness to his content that is a result of never seeing what's beyond. See someone like Andres Gomez Emilsson, a philosopher, consciousness researcher. He can't start a video without laughing. Good luck finding even a smile in Toms content.

25. We can only observe and interact with part of the probability waves the part that renders this reality. There is more going on behind the scene that we can only measure by not observing it.

26. Please improve the sound, it’s hard to bare, really bad. Like a very old phone call

27. The Lionel Messi of physics

28. Thank you ❤

29. The average physicist will tell you that the double-slit experiment shows that subatomic particles exist in this quantum state of superposition, where probability/potential rules, until an observer attempts to measure them, causing a wave-state collapse. And that these mysterious quantum effects are meaningless beyond the subatomic realm, where newtonian and relativity physics rule the day. But that's not accurate. What these results are trying to show us, is that this quantum realm is the basis of ALL reality – that everything in the macroscopic reality, this material paradigm, is a byproduct of phenomena occurring in the quantum realm. That consciousness determines how quantum reality manifests into the material reality we are familiar with.
    "Luminous beings are we, not this crude matter!"

30. Thanks Tom! On a previous video you implied that your first experiment was successful. Is that right? Are you going to release a video talking about it? I’m not sure, but I think you wanted to make documentary, right? Are you going to wait until you perform all experiments? Or how will you do it? I’d really like to know. I also know that whatever you do, it will be worth it. This is a big step for humanity and our evolution and I’m really exited

31. Thanks Tom for your awesome gift of understanding you’ve shared with us! I’m very happy to have learned so much from your My Big Toe. ❤❤

Comments are closed.