Consciousness Videos

Quantum Entanglement: 2022 Nobel Prize in Physics



World Science Festival

#QuantumEntanglement #nobelprize #BrianGreene
The 2022 Nobel Prize in Physics has been awarded to Alain Aspect, John Clauser and Anton Zeilinger for their groundbreaking work in Quantum Entanglement. Here is a brief visual summary of the essential physics.

Official Site: https://www.worldsciencefestival.com/
Twitter: https://twitter.com/WorldSciFest
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/worldsciencefestival
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/WorldSciFest/
#Science #WorldScienceFestival

Source

Similar Posts

34 thoughts on “Quantum Entanglement: 2022 Nobel Prize in Physics
  1. @2:00 When you realize all the scientists he named were from Germany. Just one country. I am always amazed at how advanced Germany was before world war 2 in science, mainly Physics.

  2. Problem with 20th century scientist is that they have godly love towards einstein with due respect to his contribution they have to come out of it and think what next same einstein did after newton who ever did they all got Nobel others are running very successful youtube channels 🎉

  3. so does this mean we solved physics back in the 20s? from my view of the world -schrodinger. Reality isnt real so does that mean conciouness is a fundemental propety of the unvierse? or does the estoric vedanta Adi Shankara or spinoza perspective work?

  4. 6:45 of propping up Einstein, 5 seconds of under his breath saying Einstein was wrong and 10 seconds mentioning the scientists who proved Einstein wrong. What an absolute joke piece of propaganda.

  5. John Bell was nominated for the Nobel but unfortunately he died of a stroke in 1990, he really should have been awarded it earlier, but as an Irish man we are still proud of him.

  6. The example which came into my mind is not that profound, but if you look at identical twins whose development happened from a dividing of a single cell, they behave exactly the same as the other regardless of the distance. It’s definitely no quantum mechanics, but does this theory apply on identical twins also?

  7. Im no quantum physicist, but doesn't this mean that a non local deterministic theory of quantum mechanics is now on the table, or should I say should be taken more seriously now that non locality is proven?

  8. A frequency wave is a multi dimensional structure.that has mass and distance therefore the energy, frequency waves and vibrations change through out the structure

  9. In a single frequency wave how much information can be put in it?our entire body receives and transmits frequency waves so how much information does our energy structure hold?

  10. I am the Nobel Hero :- కనీసం దాని జన్మ లో పుస్తకాలను కూడా రాయలేని తల లేని Afterall ఒక పిరికి దేశానికి (భారత్) నోబెల్ కావాలా ? -విజయ్ ,ఒంగోలు

  11. Well how does that communication between entangled particles happen faster than the speed of light? Even if these Nobel prize winners have been proven that they do, no one can explain how! Hmm.

  12. Quantum physics will reveal that all is connected. All order comes out of chaos when we transcend our ability to perceive patterns in our everyday physical illusion.

  13. Hey Sanatani, dont go misled by the mathematical measurement of what is called Nobel laureates. Do go go and go for concrete experience. Let not the name of science steal and mess with your chetna- consciousness. All fantastic terms…but nothing more than and nothing beyond Consciousness tha Only.

  14. Lets keep it simple and follow common sense logic. The speed of light cannot be tested in one direction, knowing this leads to the inescapable conclusion that light cannot be a particle. Because you cannot fire a particle from a moving base by pointing directly at and firing to a moving target(mirror) and have it return to the moving base which is miles away from its original location. It is that simple, primary school logic. If that is not complicated and dazzling enough, if it seems too clear to be true stop and think about it. The Earth revolves around the sun (at 31km/s) and around the milky way (at 220km/s) so for example if we fire a photon directly at a natural mirror on the moon (which astrophysicists at MIT were doing in 1963 and which was covered in the December 1966 issue of National Geographic) it takes about a second to get there but the target on the moon is already a minimum 220km away from where we fired the photon towards. Even if we overshot and aimed ahead in order to hit the target even then when it comes back we are over 440km from our original location, it is impossible, it cannot be particles. Electrons give mass to everything in our Electric Universe.

    Photons are waves rippling through the fabric, the one and only physical field and we are not made out of particles held together by mysterious forces, our physical bodies and all matter is made out of vortices, in the opening section of my ToE I give 5 reasons why the particle.model has been proven impossible time and time again, even using a deeper explanation of the photoelectric effect. The equations of 137 alpha are vortex equations. The main equation of 137 alpha is position divided by momentum which shows the range of the vacuum pull of the vortexes where we have 7 spherical harmonic oscillators touching at any point in the spacetime fabric (quantum Planck block is shown in an image at the top of my ToE website which I dont link here in case it is seen as spamming but which is given in almost all my videos) the main equation of 137 is ((n×π×7)/(n×π^7))/Λ where n is the amount of harmonic oscillators encompassing the detectable vacuum pull and where Λ is lambda, Einsteins cosmological constant. There are elastic type pipes between the harmonic oscillators which explains what string theorists deduced must be there but failed to understand how.
    The moving target example alone proves the particle model is wrong but it is not the only proof, the twin slit experiment is impossible to explain using the particle model, although some try to make us believe it happens due to bizarre nonsensical mysticism. Bell's Theorem shows that quantum mechanics is incompatible with the particle model, it in fact proves the particle model isn't real, it is exactly compatible with the wave model however, Bells predictions match exactly the detection of the momentum of waves, but particle physicists say it is the Universe which isn't locally real, that it does not have fixed but rather random laws. The Universe does have very well defined and easily understandable laws if one lets go of particle dogma and follows the sceintific evidence. Constant violations of the particle model at CERN & Fermilab also show the particle model is wrong but particle physicists want to have their cake and eat it, they want the new physics but want to hold onto the particle paradigm also which can't be done.
    Energy is never defined in physical terms by particle physicists so it is presented always as abstract(not by me) I explain detectable energy quantised is a collision of 2 harmonic oscillators which exist at every Planck point in the fabric/lattice/web, the Higgs Field is Theory built on a model which is dysfuntional, which has gluons actually giving 99% of the mass NOT the Higgs Boson, in reality, in my model which works with no assumptions and which is testable and supported by ALL the evidence it is the vortex detected as and electron or positron which gives mass to everything, mass is a measure of the compaction of the fabric of space, the electron is the vortex detected moving in one direction pulling in and compacting the fabric with its vacuum energy, larger fermions and bosons are vortices, electrons or positrons caught in loops in the geometry of the spacetime lattice/fabric pulling it tighter, the tightet the compaction the greater the mass. The big bang is Theory which some evidence supports a little bit here and there but overall shows is wrong and inflation is fairytale physics to try to keep the model alive but is untestable, has zero physical evidence and fails anyway even when used as a cheat, the early universe conditions are assumptions, half baked interpretations that do not add up. All are assumptions to align with the particle model which my opening statement about hitting a moving target in this comment illustrates is wrong. Theories which the evidence does not support. The temperature at the centre of the sun for example is another assumption, it is not science it is theoretical, I show just about every theory in cosmology is wrong and I give the correct model which is supported by ALL the evidence with no scifi math cheats or assumptions.
    Time travel is an incorrect understanding of Relativity. Time dilation/special relativity is about clocks NOT time. To keep it simple if we have two clocks at sea level showing the same time, we bring one to the top of Mount Everest for example for a while then bring it back to sea level beside the other clock at the original location both clocks show different measurements of time. Both exist in the same time however, neither has gone to exist in the past or future so it should be clear (and is clear to anyone not indoctrinated and/or intimidated by pop pseudophysics) that time is Universal but time is measured differently by clocks depending on their location and energy. My video critiquing Brian Greenes "masterclass on Special Relativity" explains why just about everything people are taught about Special Relativity is wrong.

    If anyone can, please try to be scientific and only go with common sense logic. I give the complete Theory of Everything, THE Theory of Everything which upsets or/and overturns the belief in particles in empty space or multiple quantum fields. Science is about undersanding the world in which we live in people may be sick of the waffle that is not supported by the evidence and fed up with stupid Theories of a bit of something incomprehensible but that should not mean THE Theory of Everything is not vital nor should not be taken seriously, it is vital and simple, it shows unlimited energy and metaphysics that go beyond anything anyone expected which is also backed by evidence. We already know we are at risk from massive solar flares which people in power have kept the masses blinded to. A Carringtom event alone could lead to instant power and supply problems globally, Zombie apocalypse scenarios worldwide if networks went down, what if that event were 10, 20, 100 times more powerful than the Carrington event which geo evidence shows has happened before many times? We currently have no 5 or 10 year stores of food and analogue systems of communication for backup if digital systems go down, no public awareness to pre empt and mitigate probably the most dangerous element, panic. This is not a case of debate for the sake of ego or intellectual power it is a matter of life and death for billions if something happens as makind is distracted by a disproven, failed particle model.
    My Theory is challenging to what is popular, conceptually it FEELs as unintuituve as the round Earth did at first but the simple math and absolute consistency with the evidence makes it a tragedy that pop particle physicists refuse to discuss it, It is difficult to accept for people indoctrinated with particle paradigm dogma but when EVERYTHING adds up and makes sense out of everything it becomes the science and the particle model although very convincing but ultimately dysfunctional and increasingly violated becomes the pseudoscience. The fact is giving a Nobel prize for a singularity in a black hole is money backed scifi gone mad, they are dark stars, the hottest things imaginable inside, singularities make as much sense as a piece of string having only one end or a house having an outside but no inside, no complex math needed black hole singularities violate the Planck limit which renders them meaningless cartoon mathematical ideas, relativity predicts intense regions of gravity where even light cannot escape but they are not black holes.. The correct model is explained in multiple vidoes on my channel and my ToE is linked in almost every video. The experiments to prove everything are there also. So please everyone follow the evidence, all on my channel and website which is linked in all my videos.

  15. I have measured both the position and velocity of an electron using Quantum Entanglement the answer i got was 10^ -10 meters for position and velocity I got 10^6 meters/second.

  16. it didn't trouble him. It was a try to disprove quantum theory, by showing that quantum mechanics assumptions result in information traveling faster than light, which is impossible.

  17. It would seem to me that the most obvious implications of these findings have to do with the illusion of separation and humanity's realization of its ultimate oneness. Imagine the potential for technological advances!!! (yawn) How long can this dark age of technocracy continue?

  18. If teleportation exists, as it has been recounted in millenary scriptures as the Sumerian, Egyptian, even in the native American legends or myths, then entanglement has to occur.

  19. Quantum wave function feels like a property of something to me rather than an objective physical thing, related spin in entanglement can also be considered as a property, i think the problem of more than light speed information transfer arises only if we objectify the phenomenon but we already know there is no such thing as a spin what exist is an electrone ,So if it's only a property then it could be effective instantaneously i guess🤔

  20. 6:35 and he has only told me the stuff that i have read and watched over 100 times thanks for the wasted video, i wanna know what did they discover not what was there

  21. All your life is about money, cars, houses, but you don't want to know who created you and where are you going after death, listen to your Lord in Holy Quran :
    "But whoever turns away from My Reminder will certainly have a miserable life,1 then We will raise them up blind on the Day of Judgment. They will cry, “My Lord! Why have you raised me up blind, although I used to see?. Allah will respond, “It is so, just as Our revelations came to you and you neglected them, so Today you are neglected. This is how We reward whoever transgresses and does not believe in the revelations of their Lord. And the punishment of the Hereafter is far more severe and more lasting''.
    (20:124 Holy Quran

Comments are closed.

WP2Social Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com