As promised, I’ll link this JOKE organization:
http://www.modernchurchofsatan.com/
Check it out, and be sure to pay attention to the fake pictures.
jason666king
Source
Satanism: Modern vs. Postmodern (by Request, Vol. 15)
Similar Posts
17th ITA CONFERENCE HESYCHASM THEORY AND PRACTICE 23 06 2010
Picasso
Art & Design Fundamentals by Lee Griffiths
27 thoughts on “Satanism: Modern vs. Postmodern (by Request, Vol. 15)”
Comments are closed.
@shawnhartnell I did indeed address it. And I read the website. WTF R U SMOKIN?
Lion Killing the Gazelle…thats good. Jason if you could respond, what books have you read that follow that Exact phrase and philosophy on Satanism?
@Godisableedingfaggot As mentioned, Bloom's _The Lucifer Principle_. Sun Tzu, _The Art of War_. Niccolo Machiavelli, _The Prince_. Charles Darwin, _The Origin of the Species_. Frederich Nietzsche, _The Antichrist_. But it is not a philosophy gained from books, it is rather an observed facticity regarding the world.
thanks
I dare you, Jason, to find any corporation without such douchebag pictures of multiethnic people smiling…while I understand the criticism about unoriginality or strength, ripping somebody over layout is just…petty (is that the word?).
@Vinterfader Well, I'd rip the substance, except there is none . . .
I see more than that again with the lion and the gazelle?The lion is the gazelles best friend it keeps the gazelle fit and keeps the numbers down so they dont over graze.See friendly!
@hartejoseph Yes! The Current pushes *all* towards betterment. Not just the predator, but also the prey. Except, "friendly" is a stretch . . .
@jason666king This might be true, but I think that the website has the potential to at least work as an introduction to Satanism for people that are curious. It is, to me at least, better than the CoS webpage, which is drowned in BS and where the merch section if one of the first sub-links. I agree that it is just a website, though, and that it holds nothing new. You still find more information there than on the CoS page.
1 Ok friendly is a bit of a metaphysical stretch.You might prefer for the gazelles own damn good but its still a very small reductionist microsmic example.How about this stars have to die to make elements and become black holes to hold more stars together in a galaxy.
@hartejoseph and how about that? The Current encompasses all fractal levels of perception, otherwise it wouldn't be what it is.
2.But the star was not eaten it destroyed itself because of its nature it was set up that way wether it knew it or not.But it didn't really destroy itself it just changed maybe it just wanted to be a big daddy black hole with little baby stars around it!
2.But the star was not eaten it destroyed itself because of its nature it was set up that way wether it knew it or not.But it didn't really destroy itself it just changed maybe it just wanted to be a big daddy black hole with little baby stars around it!
2.But the star was not eaten it destroyed itself because of its nature it was set up that way wether it knew it or not.But it didn't really destroy itself it just changed maybe it just wanted to be a big daddy black hole with little baby stars around it!
@LakeShaman my apologies, I get a few requests, and I'm a moody bastard. What can I say . . .
I know what your talking about but they dont.They just seem to want to piss on alters and rely on the nervous system and the five senses.Having said that there is still that current that wants to completely reject the flesh.You know the death cult that worships dead guys on sticks.
im about halfway through ur book, and ya ive had to look up a few definitions lol. but besides my limited vocabulary im enjoying it
An interesting perspective… you choose to see the adversarial nature of what you refer to as the current in your vid with an example of the Lion vs Gazelle… but I would like to flip that theory, just for fun, and offer an alternate perspective stating that the current is synchronistic by nature, whereas the forces of the physical universe tend to seek a balance or equalization point in ORDER to produce material reality, regardless of individual conscious intent… any thoughts on this?
@sonyfreak4069 It is an internet forum with an attached website. Hardly a church by any means. If you enjoy the banter in the forum, that's great. But real Satanists need neither guidelines nor leadership. Non Serviam.
I've done a video on the ToS, and I am critical of them as well (for entirely different reasons). And the FCoS . . . yes, a joke – just one I haven't gotten around to telling yet.
@Mitzpatrick Yes! But this is a different fractal level. A while back, I made a series of videos on this rough topic (Esoterica Scientificae) – unfortunately, YT degraded the feeds, and I didn't have hard copies. There is a balance through imbalance, and the universe "exists" via a symmetry-break (or, more properly, a hierarchy of such breaks). Perhaps I should revisit this . . .
@sonyfreak4069 We all learn from the totality of our perceptual existence. This is the meaning of "dharma". However, there is an ever so fine line between dharma and guru, which the fakirs use to their advantage. Take me for example. I put stuff out there, but the minute I start saying shit like "follow me," or "do what I say," please tell me to go fuck myself.
As for why I'm hostile towards groups, it's for two reasons: they tend to be fake/pretentious, and they dilute individuality.
@satanicinternational lol true dat shit
*sigh* Jason…LOVED your book 'Postmodern Satanism' and respect your opinion BUT…
MCoS is NOT a carbon copy of CoS. They are 'original' (please see page 2 of the 'development' tab). Admittedly I don't have a clue who some of the people are in the photos, but some are of one actual member in particular. Fuck the pics, read the content! I never had my 'ass handed to me' at LttD (now that's funny) but I am a member of the MCoS forum. I even plugged your book there…anyway…MCoS isn't a 'joke'.
I think you're an okey guy, but why so negative? The "fake" pics on the site, is not to show the members or "leaders" of the site. It's a form or organization, and a very good forum 🙂 That's my opinion, we all have the right to mean what we want.
@jason666king – Please do… I would be interested to hear your thoughts.
fuck off
The CoS isn't doing anything. What's wrong with someone picking up the ball and moving it forward? I'm not saying that's what this modern satanism website is doing or has done, just posing the question to you. If that's what they are doing, what would be wrong with that?