AlexCMoro81
Professor Steven Pinker talked about his book, The Blank Slate: The Modern Denial of Human Nature, published by Viking. In it, he describes three major theories that have shaped our understanding of human nature, including the idea that the mind is a “blank slate” shaped entirely by external influences. The theory of man as a “noble savage” and the theory that the human mind is independent of the body are also discussed. Professor Pinker argues that these theories are flawed and suggests that there is a genetic basis for human nature that all three theories ignore. He also addresses the backlash, from both the political left and right, to the idea that genes influence human nature and argues that the arguments these critics make are based on non sequiturs (Latin, literally ‘it does not follow’. A conclusion or statement that does not logically follow from the previous argument or statement. example: “… his weird mixed metaphors and non sequiturs”). Following his presentation the professor took questions from the audience.
10/10/02
Source
Similar Posts
8 thoughts on “Steven Pinker – The Blank Slate: The Modern Denial of Human Nature”
Comments are closed.
What's he saying here that's in any way new?
We are in Utopia. And Utopia is boring.
Geez! I could smell the disgust coming off of him as he referred to those frightening Neanderthals who disagreed with him. Hubris!
Completely enjoyed that. Props to a great summary.
pinker looks like a horse riding lesbian
The blank slate theory makes absolute no sense, otherwise, for example, dogs that live with humans would behave in the same way as humans do because they were socialized together.
This is clearly a hate crime
Religion is a utopian notion