Consciousness Videos

String Theory Explained – What is The True Nature of Reality?



Kurzgesagt – In a Nutshell

Is String Theory the final solution for all of physic’s questions or an overhyped dead end?

This video was realised with the help of Dr. Alessandro Sfondrini and it was funded by SNSF under Agora Grant n. 171622 and through the NCCR SwissMAP: The Mathematics of Physics.

See also our video on the black-hole information paradox: https://bit.ly/2DU6p8P

Kurzgesagt Newsletter: http://eepurl.com/cRUQxz

Support us on Patreon so we can make more videos (and get cool stuff in return): https://www.patreon.com/Kurzgesagt?ty=h

Kurzgesagt merch: http://bit.ly/1P1hQIH

Facebook: http://bit.ly/1NB6U5O
Twitter: http://bit.ly/2DDeT83
Instagram: http://bit.ly/2DEN7r3
Discord: https://discord.gg/Fsstncs

The music of the video here:

Soundcloud: http://bit.ly/2CsAbob
Bandcamp: http://bit.ly/2oHsSPZ
Facebook: http://bit.ly/2qW6bY4

THANKS A LOT TO OUR LOVELY PATRONS FOR SUPPORTING US:

Flavio Storino, Alice Balcon, Hari Krishnan, Warren Wiscombe, Sara Zeglin, Asiryan Alexander, maarten sprengers, William Northern, Kerem Mimaroglu, Yana Kultysheva, Josh, Keaton Anderson, Croconaw, Peter Steinberger, Jonathan Diamond, Troy McConaghy, Paddy, Darko Sperac, Peter Burkhalter, Chris Amaris, Tyler Lovell, John Ruble, Chase Henson, Arpita Singh, Edward C.P., Andreas Edlund, Ryan Bubinski, Paul Greyson, Jerry Ding, Austin Sundquist, Daniel Link, Tim Johnson, kayleigh dreste, Johan Sjöblom, Max Stuart, Mush Rain, Andor Baranyi, Eduardas Afanasjevas, Bill Clem, Jake Smith, Stephen Woerner, Jeff Sorensen, Christopher Damsgaard, Eduardo AV, Michael Gawenka, Florian Hoedt, Lucas Nyman, Nathanael Baker, Martin Wierzyk, Mauricio Streb, Karl, Rameet Chawla, Joachim Andersen, Avinash, Erik Golden, Glenn Stoltz, Elliott Nelson, Andrew Averett, Ben Wei

Help us caption & translate this video!

http://www.youtube.com/timedtext_cs_p

String Theory Explained – What is The True Nature of Reality?

Source

Similar Posts

44 thoughts on “String Theory Explained – What is The True Nature of Reality?
  1. It didn’t really explain it I know they are vibrating strings however I don’t know how they affect me and my atoms and the universe as a whole and how empty space uses strings

  2. If you believe in God you can't see Him because He's a much higher power of energy and you can't see Him because light passes through Him He is a spirit don't make this mess up ypur believes

  3. I cant see something without interacting with it….. so what is a psychadelic experience. Am i actually interacting woth something then? I like to think i am

  4. They teach us the heisenberg principle and it's basicly that the most approximate knowledge of the particle position, the less approximation of speed of it, kind of

  5. STRING THEORY……it is more simple than that…..SCIENCE I MEAN NASA CLAIMS THE TRUTH IS THE OPPOSITE OF GOD:::::::WICH MAKES NASA THE::::::::::::::::

  6. Am I starting to think about this on the right track or am I way off?

    Is compactification of dimensions to be thought of as a similar type of warping to the way gravity warps the 4 dimensions we know and love? Just as, if the universe had positive curvature it could be unbounded but finite; should I consider these dimensions as extremely positively curved, so that the whole dimension loops back on it self within something around the plank scale?

    That seems strange and would leave me with a picture of space as made up of a huge number of individual looped dimensions stacked together. Maybe this doesn't mean that each individual unit is uniquely perpendicular to every other individual unit, but if they are finite because of extreme curvature it does suggest that there are individual units stacking up to make space time no?

    It also seems weird to me to think of space having any kind of structure like this because it sounds a bit like a stationary "ether"; something about space it self relative to which an object could move. Of course this flies in the face of relativity, so something about my thinking hear is almost certainly wrong.

  7. I think we are visualization inside visualization and it’s infinity like two mirrors behind each other.
    And we already created another visualization exactly like we where visualizated. Just question of time when it’ll be that good that that visualization starts it own visualization. Just crazy. It fucked my mind.

  8. If the atom showed no initial ingredients , than maybe it doesn't has a begining ! What If it doesn't hold matter at all !? In my opinion, it could be made out of information and vibration of a magnetic force field, like a Torus ! It could be the antimatter it self to start the initial wave ! Pardon my french but the book says : "In the begining there was the word !" I think that information and antimatter are the basics of the waving clouds of atom ! After all, energy can't be created or destroid , but only recycled ! Why it's energy eternal ?! Maybe because it has the same nature like the space-time fabrick , electromagnetic ?!

Comments are closed.

WP2Social Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com