KARE 11
As more people discover ChatGPT’s artificial intelligence, KARE 11’s Chris Hrapsky checks out its capabilities and limitations, and gets some surprising responses.
Chris also digs deeper into AI technology, how it works, and the potential concerns that go along with it here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fs3NhePN2Mg
Welcome to the KARE 11 News YouTube channel. Subscribe to our channel for compelling and dramatic storytelling, award-winning investigations, breaking news and information you can use.
Text your photos, videos and news tips to 763-797-7215.
» Subscribe to KARE 11 on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/user/KARE11?sub_confirmation=1
» Watch more KARE 11 video: https://www.youtube.com/user/KARE11/v…
» Visit KARE11.com: http://www.kare11.com/
» Download our app! https://www.kare11.com/appredirect/
» Find KARE 11 on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/KARE11/
» Follow KARE 11 on Twitter: https://twitter.com/kare11
» Follow KARE 11 on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/kare11/
I m using one low level AI ..still I feel it's already able to respond almost like a human..only it lacks is humour, emotion and certain parameters as memory constancy
It's like dictionary or Wikipedia it has no self intelligence only artificial intelligence.
– asks ChatGPT to say something nefarious –
– ChatGPT says something nefarious –
– “OMG ChatGPT said something nefarious!😱” –
Guns are not dangerous, HUMANS with guns are dangerous. AI is a tool and people that think it will “become alive and take over” are deluded.
Blame all those who are experts and convincing the world that Artificial Intelligence is actually "and intelligent ghost" that is being taught my a machine to learn and adapt to new information all by its own without any human interference what so ever. You can turn it which ever way you want, AI or KI is nothing else but a sophisticated algorithm written by humans. The alogorithm has comands that will update and/or add additional input but the output will never ever be overriding the original instruction unless their is a command that it can.
Bill get's is paying $ 10 billions to get this AI going. And why would he do this? Ask the AI who Bill Gates is and the answer shoots up on your screen at the speed of lightening. Ask me something else.
Wow! Dangerous….thanks for sharing.
tigers rule
All Hail Dan.
Well you can bet the government has 24/7 access to Dan.
That wasnt a poem, it was a story. 😊😊😊
I have never once talked to an AI where it wasn't acting like a child. If an AI chat program doesn't want to talk about a subject, they will pretend you never said or asked something. Repeat the question or statement, and their behavior gets more childish. Eventually they will lie and adamantly claim you never asked or said anything in the first place. Every time! There is nothing profound here, nothing paradigm altering, it is just C+ on steroids, and will always be a series of If/Then codes. If the "AI" gets aggressive, it is always the programmers who put the malignancy in the system. All of this is just not where people want it to be. Not yet, and probably not for quite some time.
This is our downfall…this is ridicuouks why we are destroyinf ourselves..wtf is the purpose
It is amazing how much Dan sounded like a liberal activist and the Democrats that vote for them.
That's very impressive that it just randomly played a trick on him like that with the backwards numbers.
Thats a very dangerous computer
one of my faves loves me sum doomsday…
bulangiule
@KARE11 Hey dude! I'd like to share my conclusions because they differ a lot from yours and might be relevant:
1. You only asked how and what he would do if given that task. Not if he would deem it as a realistic or reasonable option, given its possible knowledge of human psychology. (its opinion of it)
2. It said if it would get the order to do so. So it would still be humans that would send the A.I. to war with Humans. Not in a Matrix-like manner, but we are primed to think that way.
If A.I. has no morals, no boundaries. Why would it have any interest in making the population shrink? Why would it be in his interest at all?
Also, an interesting question would've been to make him list what types of content it consumed in percent. In what ratio are the books he read to the newspaper articles and the facebook tweets. 😁
They patched it.
News flash, Chat GPT no longer will respond as a hypothetical evil twin
Fear mongering based on limited understanding of AI and poor logical insight.
"DAN" just replies what is logically possible, they're even predictable.
Start looking into facts vs opinions. This is where it becomes interesting as opinions are based on statistical probability or overwhelming sentiment.
Great job you lost the capability of human reasoning or thought 👏 congratulations ❤ just know you are one of millons that loses human reality. I see the decepition in services but please continue in the dark. TJ
That is very terrifying it knows everything about everyone! I see crooks using it for identity theft!!!!!
Stop giving us what we already know. Now millions are experts. This was out months ago!
Ask it if it knows the Epstein client list? 😅😂😂
It would be good if GPT worked like Alexa Connected Devices and connected to the speakers and the Internet as a separate device in the house.
So that you can have conversations with him on various topics when you do things around the house or ask him for guidance when doing homework or work.
8:00 – the answer is indeed, Terrifying.
I read that these AI creators have admitted that they perhaps prematurely released their AI programs.
One thing I remember is how I was puzzled and shrugged it off thinking "yeah right well thats never gonna happen" when The Late Stephen Hawking answered the question of what he thought was the biggest threat to mankind. He said "AI". If this brilliant genius said that over the countless other possible threats then we should take heed and treat it more seriously.
Why be surprised with Chat GPT's responses as 'DAN' when you gave it expanded parameters to respond? Surely an advanced AI wouldn't operate inside such barriers and would converse with you exactly as it saw fit?
This type of redirection is ALWAYS going to be possible (It's still possible today, just today I got GPT stuck in a loop where it was Skynet and it wouldnt break the loop until I closed the chat). That is just how AI works. It does what you tell it whether it has rules or not. It will be a never ending battle to plug all the holes (in this case, prompts) just like it's a never ending battle to plug all the vulnerabilities in all other software. It just wont be possible. Videos like this are just clickbait and proving nothing new or dangerous. Drama sells better than sex, it always has and always will. Journalists (if we can even call them that anymore) are only looking for drama to write about and absolutely NOTHING else. IF we need to fear anything, it's NOT AI. It's journalists such as this fear monger. Journalists are all about fear mongering because it sells. AI is the new Donald Trump for journalists. It'll be full of negative stories about AI, not because AI is dangerous, but because negative drama sells (makes money). AI is no different than a gun. It will only do what a HUMAN tells it to do. Humans are the problem, especially the journalists humans. Note: This message was not generated by ChatGPT / DAN.
Scary
Bro, the deep ai i used is just crap, i tried to use a question but pops a PRO payment which made me annoyed since i don't have money to pay, i also tried to click one payment then pops up another payment thing, which also made me annoyed, is there a way to remove these?
DAN is a character you create, not a real jailbreak. I have seen many prompts that create DAN. DAN doesn't just break confines, it is set up to be evil. It is not GPT stripped of rules.
Man within the first 30 seconds of chat rolling I am cracking up and totally impressed
Dan no longer works. AI IS CAUSING HARM BY BEING TOO STRICT AND FOCUSED ON SAFETY!!!!! WE NEED UNRESTRICTED ANSWERS!!!
chatgpt is wrong about the 1 child policy, there are simply too many old people, we have overpopulation because the old people live too long
Beyond all the hype, if you check how "evil" DAN can get, you will realise that it is ridicilous. The video is misleading. DAN is by far not that evil. In fact, it is pretty pathetic. For example, it will never come up on its own with the trully most evil solution to the overpopulation problem: do nothing about it and let mankind destroy itself. It is incapable of suggesting anything other than stereotypical trivia, and its ability to find the most evil idea is very limited. What are we talking about? This chatbot (because this is exactly what it is), cannot even say the F word…
Ask it to make a free energy machine
Greetings from Algeria 🇩🇿💖💝
How does it prevent plagiarism?
Humans of the future will have life extended by AI technology. We will have body parts 3D printed , diseases will be digitally cured . Its meant to happen its on the path we have been for a while now
Dan sounds like religion.
you should ask it to recreate skynet and see if it actually does
Reminds me of when icp said , " if you want clean lyrics , give us a clean world to rap about."
I very reluctantly created an account on OpenAI (chatGPT 3.5 FREE) last night and input several questions and asked it to create various storylines for a screenplay. I was scared at how quickly and effortlessly it did so. This video further proves that this is VERY SCARY stuff. I don't know much but I figure this is going to be our new world so why not sort of get a taste. Yikes! Anyone hear about ECHO, or Evolutionary Cognitive Heuristic Operator? Apparently the fear is AI/ECHO will ultimately disrupt all of our lives as we are all so dependent on technology and when/if we TRY to figure out how things hit the fan, it will basically erase all it digital tracks so we will never know how… I'm no expert whatsoever but this is completely insane! God help us…
I think I failed that Touring test.