The multiverse, AI and consciousness – part2 quantum mechanics, neuroscience and reality

2 thoughts on “The multiverse, AI and consciousness – part2 quantum mechanics, neuroscience and reality”

1. Hi Mr. Wes, how can we use this to become a better person?

2. Hi Wes, i've watched both of your video's and I agree with the vast majority of your hypothesis on reality and the Universe and have similar beliefs myself. In your model as in mine, we come across the chicken and the egg scenario. A Universe cannot exist without a neurological system to collapse wave functions into particle functions and so can only ever be in superposition with itself and humans cannot exist without the material Universe. In this scenario, when ever you pose such a question it always has the same mathematical solution which is infinity. The Universe didn't begin first and life didn't begin first, they are both in infinite superposition to each other and neither came first and neither came last, they came together and didn't appear at all. In this model we have a slight problem with big bang theory because when scientists are trying to calculate the mass of the Universe during the expansion period, technically speaking the expansion didn't take place until 13.8 billion years later when wave functions were collapsed into measurable energy by us. Obviously we have to ignore the linear measurement of time which in reality doesn't exist so that the creation, expansion of the Universe together with the forming of neurological systems all happened simultaneously. But scientists especially astrophysicists choose to ignore Quantum field effects and choose to concentrate their calculations and hypothesis on the macro totally ignoring that the macro is in fact the Quantum field on a large scale. If we conclude that the process of Universe versus consciousness (neurology) is an infinite event in as far as determining which came first then we must seriously consider each individual conscious person and their own relationship with the Universe. The collective conscious of all of us versus the Universe is not a valid argument and I'll tell you why. We experience the Universe through our own neurology not any one else's and the entire picture we get is entirely between each individual and the Universe. Therefore if we assume that man's relationship with the Universe is infinite we cannot pick any point in time or anyone's life to be starting point. The only solution to this argument is to assume every person that has ever lived and will ever live has an infinite relationship with the Universe. What does this mean? It means that everyone was born simultaneously and died simultaneously because of the inherent lack of linear time. If everyone is born and dies simultaneously then for the Universe to ever have existed then life and death are also in superposition and the concept of life and death in superposition to the Universe can only have one outcome – infinity. This means you are born and die infinitely because if you don't, taking into consideration that everyone was born and died simultaneously then the Universe cannot continue because any finite relationship with neurology spells an end, and if there is an end then there is by definition no beginning.

Comments are closed.