The Thunderbolts Project
A reading of the article “Gravitational Waves” by Wal Thornhill. Narrated by David Harrison, proprietor of Stickman On Stone.
The headline shrieked, “Gravitational waves have been discovered; Einstein proved right again after 100 years.” This milestone from the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Observatory (LIGO) was announced in February 2016. Two weeks later, Wal posted his critical analysis.
Some incredibly detailed claims were made; the signal originated in the last fraction of a second before the fusion of two black holes somewhere in the southern sky, it was based on computer modeling that these black holes had joined 1.3 billion years ago, and they had a combined mass 29-to-36 times greater than the Sun.
A mathematical computer model is not real evidence for those claims. The public is being baffled by punctilious abstractions. This isn’t science.
Black holes are a flawed theoretical concept used to make the minuscule force of gravity responsible for the most energetic compact bursts of energy in the universe. However, what can succeed without stretching either space-time or credulity, is the most concentrated form of stored electromagnetic energy known to science—a plasmoid.
In summary, the results of the LIGO experiment have nothing to do with imagined Gravitational Waves.
SOURCE ARTICLE
Holoscience: EU Views – February 25, 2016
https://www.holoscience.com/wp/gravitational-waves/
—-
Ideas and/or concepts presented in this program do not necessarily express or represent the Electric Universe model or the views of The Thunderbolts Project or T-Bolts Group Inc.
If you see a CC with this video, it means that subtitles are available. To find out which ones, click on the Gear Icon in the lower right area of the video box and click on “subtitles” in the drop-down box. Then click on the subtitle that you would like.
The Thunderbolts Project — a Voice for the Electric Universe
http://thunderbolts.info
Become a Producer through the PATREON Rewards program…
https://patreon.com/tboltsproject
Subscribe to Thunderbolts eNewsletter http://eepurl.com/ETy41
Guides to the Electric Universe https://www.thunderbolts.info/wp/eu-guides/
Electric Universe Books & Merch http://StickmanOnStone.com/
Electric Universe by Wal Thornhill http://HoloScience.com/wp/
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/thethunderboltsproject/
Facebook http://facebook.com/thunderboltsproject
X @tboltsproject
The Thunderbolts Project™
Trademark of T-Bolts Group Inc. a non-profit 501(c)(3) organization.
Copyright © 2016–2024 T-Bolts Group Inc. & Holoscience.com. All rights reserved.
Source
The 186000 mps speed of light is in an oxygen atmosphere at sea level, and the speed of light in sea water is 186000 mps to 0 in just 30 meters.
What is the speed in space? No one knows.
The cosmic background radiation has been proven to be the heat radiated from earths ocean water at night.
Never been detected by our orbital telescopes because they are all looking away from the earth.
Please stop with the kilometers to miles conversions. Just use miles. We all know the difference.
They tell us that gravitational waves propagate through the 'vacuum of space' (along the aether) at the speed of light (far field) which I do not doubt at all; yet, at the same time, they describe these waves as 'ripples in the fabric of spacetime'; and ripples are mechanical waves which do not and cannot propagate at the speed of light, let alone in the 'vacuum of space'; only electromagnetic waves are able to do so.
"I believe that when gravity is finally understood, it will be found that it and magnetism are manifestations of the same thing" – Albert Einstein.
Gravity shares the properties of both the electromagnetic and weak nuclear forces in that it has infinite range but is weak. Recent findings also indicate that when the force carrying bosons of gravitational fields otherwise known as gravitons interact with the magnetospheres of neutron stars, they are transformed into photons of light; all of which strongly indicates that a component of its manifestation at the quantum level of the universe is electromagnetism.
It's not ignorance, they know they're wrong. They're all standing their ground in some final last stand to keep this criminal grift going.
Another criminal grift are these multi billion dollar tax payer funded fusion reactors.
Ligo is an instrument of technocratic totalitarian control, super sensitive though.
They are proving the existance of the Aether.
Indeed …and thank you Wal Thornhill and you guys working on the Thunderbolts Project for your work on bringing our consciousness into alignment with the true nature of reality …for this status is absolutely fundamental to us making any real progress with comprehending how Life actually works, and how that then empowers us as a species to evolve our consciousness accurately and appropriately, since it is in a state of resonance with Life Being Life…
I'm 8 minutes in and struggling with the argument that gravity can't construct circular stable orbits if the parent attractor is in constant motion… I mean, surely the frame of reference that is moving is not just the Sun on its own, but also includes the planets?
You can't drop an argument like "all orbits would decay if governed by just gravity" and then skip on like it's nothing. I think I'm out. This video seems made for purposes of casual persuasion, followed by paying to go to a convention…
“It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled.”
Nice work. Simplicity and humility lie at the base of most great discoveries and their applications. Perhaps there will soon be an electromagnetic and gravity conferences based upon observable vs mathematical evidence.
Keep up the excellent work
Matt Livelsberg (Las Vegas bomber) claimed the US and China have "gravitic propulsion systems"?
Isn't there also a ligo in Italy? Or am I experiencing a Mandeville moment?
"you cannot wave nothing"… 100% correct
When will there be a review of the Malcolm Thunderstorm Generator ?
General Relativity is dead. The Luminiferous Aether is real! The Zero Point Field is where we need to look next. Gravity is a shadow effect as imagined by Fatio and Le Sage.
I just remembered in slovenian children's story, fairytale (Little Sleepy Star = Zvezdica Zaspanka. Written by Slovenian Author Fran Milčinski Ježek.
Shortest synopsys: she comes to Earth to encounter a bandit, who has to remember to listen to his heart again.
Spring is come
For I can smell the stench of carrion on the wind
Einsteins will feed on fallen siblings
Till they too fall and are heard no more
Scientists studying the data gathered from NASA's SOFIA telescope found gravitational lines feeding a "Black Hole" Sounds like more of Thornhills predictions are proving to be right with actual data to back up his predictions unlike the mainstreams who seem surprised by every new observation. Here is a link for the original report.
https://youtu.be/9SBfgQ1izLo?si=iyH2yJjxR6EITJM7
@4:55 Indeed, Einstein didn't understand gravity. That's why he proposed 2 different scenarios after astronomers discovered galaxies were moving away from us in every direction. He proposed that if the effects of gravity were not infinite, then after a big bang the universe would expand at a cosmological constant. The furthest galaxies would not be affected by gravity and continue moving away from us at a constant velocity. He said if the effects of gravity were infinite, then he proposed the furthest galaxies would be slowing down, come to a halt then reverse directions and eventually the universe would end in what he called the big crunch.
Edwin Hubble studying the motion of galaxies discovered galaxies were not only moving away from us in every direction, but the further the galaxy, the faster it was moving away. Proving both of Einstein's ideas about gravity to be wrong, his cosmological constant and his big crunch.
Einstein also predicted what's known as look back time where because of the speed of light, big bang and the age of the universe that telescopes would be able to see back into the universe's past the further and more sensitive the telescope. Recently the JWST proved that idea wrong too when it measured old, not young but old, fully mature galaxies further than a light distance of 14 billion light years away.
Einstein's equations also predicted that nothing, not even light is able to escape the gravity of a black hole, and gravitational lensing of light. In 1919 Arthur Eddington claims he measured the light of a distant star to be located in a different spot during a total solar eclipse and said it was evidence of Einstein's gravitational lensing of light. Yet no other scientist confirmed his claim. I've tried to repeat his experiment during the 2022 total solar eclipse and was unable to see any stars beyond the sun and moon conjunction because the sun's corona ring around the moon was way too bright to see distant dim stars. Which made me believe Eddington lied to get recognition. Search the internet for images of total solar eclipses and you won't find a single image showing stars behind the diamond ring effect or umbra where the sun's corona shines brightly around the moon. Eddington basically lied. Stars cannot be measured during a total solar eclipse.
Einstein didn't even know what was causing gravity. sure his and Newton's equations perfectly describe the orbits, trajectories and motion of planets and other small bodies orbiting the sun, but they never addressed the action causing gravity because they didn't know.
There is a simple experiment that can be done to determine if gravitational waves are the result of black holes colliding. Simply go through the radio telescope data and look for an electromagnetic event that occurred at the same moment and location of the gravitational wave detected by LIGO. If the gravitational waves were produced by a pair of black holes colliding, because nothing can escape them then they would not produce an electromagnetic signature. EM waves are light. Light is not supposed to be able to escape one black hole, let along the mass of two colliding.
I wrote to NASA astronomers in 2015 after LIGO measured the first GW. I suggested they go over the radio telescope and look for an EM signature at the same time and location of the GW. I told them if it was a pair of black hole colliding it would not produce the EM signature. If it wasn't a pair of black holes colliding it would produce the EM signature. A week or so went by and they confirmed, at the same moment and location where the GW occurred they discovered an EM signature and then was required to downplay the event as a pair of neutron stars colliding, not black holes.
I'm willing to bet, every time a GW is measured, an EM signature accompanies it, indicating black holes colliding are not causing the GWs they're measuring. Some other electromagnetic event is causing the so called GWs.
Even today, scientists and new articles continue to claim the first GW discovered in 2015 was from a pair of black holes colliding. They refuse to accept the data from radio telescopes proving otherwise.
'Jews' . . yes a religious designation . . are Arabs latest haplotype gene studies
Newton, inspite of his era of the dawn of science, was more correct than Einstein. His equation although very simple, did not involve time, meaning he knew that gravity is instaneous. He honestly declared that gravity is a force but he did not know what caused it. On the other hand, Einstein had no idea what he was getting into!!
Einstein was a fraud!!
🙂
Aside: Einstein disregarded one of the two observers (two systems through motion). At the very beginning of his SRT genesis. Everything from here on is unscientific nonsense.
Relativity is symmetric.