Consciousness Videos

What Is Quantum Consciousness? | John Douillard's LifeSpa



John Douillard

What Is Quantum Consciousness? | John Douillard’s LifeSpa

Read the associated article: https://lifespa.com/quantum-physics-vedic-science
Sign up for our free weekly video newsletter: http://lifespa.com/newsletter-signup
Like us on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/dr.douillard
Follow @JohnDouillard on Twitter
Learn more about Ayurveda: http://lifespa.com/about-lifespa/ayurveda/what-is-ayurveda/

Where do we come from? Who are we and how do we explain the secrets of the universe that have plagued scientists for thousands of years?

Interestingly, some of the unifying theories of the universe resemble principles from ancient Vedic
writings. While most pressing questions regarding the universe still remain unanswered and many of the theories unproven, much progress has been made. One theory that suggests the quantum field is in fact consciousness was believed to be true by two Nobel prize winning scientists. One was Max Planck—the father of quantum theory.

In this article we will explore the ancient Vedic wisdom when compared to modern quantum theory in an attempt to support the case that consciousness may in fact be the basis for quantum field theory.

RELATED ARTICLES:
Protein Definiency: The Hidden Signs — https://lifespa.com/protein-deficiency-the-hidden-signs/
How To Remove Thyroid-Damaging Flouride with Iodine — https://lifespa.com/could-fluoride-be-causing-a-thyroid-epidemic/
Is Embracing Community Responsible for Brain Evolution — https://lifespa.com/embracing-community-responsible-brain-evolution/

Source

Similar Posts

15 thoughts on “What Is Quantum Consciousness? | John Douillard's LifeSpa
  1. Wow! As interesting as this was…most of it flew right over my head, sadly. Can anyone please offer further resources that can explain this theory of Entanglement/quantum physics? I do have one question though. If the first double slit particle experiment was not “observed”, how do they know the particles formed a wave? Because, he said that even with the mechanical device used to record or observe the experiment, the particles changed their outcome… so what dud they have to compare it to? Thank you in advance for any enlightenment 😊

  2. What you're talking about is a top scientific manipulation. It's not that looking at one thing causes the other to become the same, like you've said. There's no proof for that, it's only one and not a propable one possible theoretical option based on our limited aparature and poor assumptions. The whole quantum psysics is one big manipulation based rather on beliefs than logical conclusions or evidence. And no wonder, while the chiefs of this research are vatican or/and satanist agents of influence.

    The main principle that ruined the Q science was the 'double slit experiment' and the manipulation is both in the words and meanings, and conclusions. Particle bombardment they call an act of observation, which it is not. Professional scientific observation doesn't influence the observed subject. If it does, it's called intervention, and not observation. And there's nothing new about intervention causing an effect, right? About 'creepy' effect. It's an illusion. If you set say 2 circles spinning in the same direction and speed, and take them apart, well, after a while, they will still spin at the same rates and directions. But it doesn't prove any force at work between them, now does it?

    Quentum science is not weird at all. It's just that they called particles there 'weird'. Why? Propably so they can manipulate us even further using pseudo scientific mambo jumbo talk. The marvelous nature of the universe and it's patterns are the same in every scale, from galaxies to quarks. And if someone says otherwise, well, i always wait for his proof, based on reality and not maths, because the empty words and numbers on paper can't proove a thing.

  3. It’s all electricity.
    Though our aim of evolution of the consciousness should probably be to become more like a wave (and thus closer to our more pure/godly self) rather than particle (material entrapment)… climb the Jacob ladder, don’t descend even further.

  4. I'd say the particles have little brains haha only joking, it's the universe having a laugh with scientists, All is in all. God-spirit is in everything, pure intelligent energy, the light, the particles know we are watching dun dun dunnn they are alive like everything

  5. Dr. Douillard, that was amazing and very well explained, thank you! Here is my take on it…not even sure if it makes any sense or if it is essentially the same thing you’re saying but: when the particles are interacting with each other, they are existing as the unified field/consciousness/pure awareness and therefore, they are infinite probabilities all coexisting simultaneously. When you the observer comes along, you create a vantage point and because you create that vantage point, only one of the infinite probabilities can exist. So the act of observing creates a single observed effect. The observer by the act of observing, chooses one of the outcomes (or one of the particles) from the infinite pool. Does that make any sense 🧐 or am I missing the point? This is mind-boggling

Comments are closed.

WP2Social Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com