34 thoughts on “Zodiac Killer – Linguistic Analysis”
All wrong.
Mr. Rogers was the Zodiac killer. The whole TV show was a front.
I do not think the ciphers are any help in solving the case. I also have a learning disability where I drop letters while writing and make spelling mistakes and do not notice them until i look back at my writing later.
“Linguists look at the language of the writing.” Oh really?
Ronnie pickerings dad it was
There was two people so I'm guessing cousins or an uncle and nephew or a father and son
Wh at a was te
Ross
Meh.
That was a painful 11 minutes. I already knew all of that, and they should have hired an actor to deliver this information. This guy is hard to stay with.
My understanding is Aurther L Allen was exonerated by DNA
Also I have searched intently for DNA results on Zodiac stamps and letters from 2019 tests. It cannot take this long for results. My thinking is they don't have a match with suspects, so their only hope is familial DNA on a genealogy website.
I believe this is a bonus featurette on the bonus material disc from the 2-disc bluray special edition of the movie but anyway thanks for made this available in YouTube …
Has anyone ever taken the extra lor missing letters to see what they may spell out, or if they're a part of the cypher? Is it possible that ALA wrote for the zodiac and maybe that's why he cannot be discounted as being involved?
I think,,,, pretty many know Who knows WHO's war hes was hire,, and the code is not code Its messeges,,,, as when killed,,, the suffering,,,, is us whos left,
Bottom line they dont know who the Zodiac killer was I remember Sept 27th 1969 my family was at lake berryessa and it was my dads birthday I was not there but I remember the panic and fear The Zodiac created, not to mention the poor people lives he took. They will never know who the real killer was. It's obvious he was too smart for everyone.
Dude. It wasn't Arthur L. Let it go already.
Now I just feel terribly saddened; that little girl murder is so horrible, the poor little soul with no one to love and protect her.
I only do linguini analysis
This man is a human metronome.
I feel like the Linguistics guy is what George Lucas would look like if he shaved his beard
Two or three different people wrote the same letter to throw off the investigators.
Thr linguist nailed the child killing mom dead to rights. The linguist is justified to be at 5 on the scale or inconclusive. Yet Michael Mageau gave an 8 as far as identification of his assailant. The writing on Hartnell's Karman Ghia is Zodiac. Hartnell's pang of recognition of that door when viewing it in the evidence room is painful to watch. Zodiac trumps every case I can think of. Jack the Ripper is a close second.
Allen's handwriting was dramatically different from that of the Zodiac. At 9:41, note how Zodiac's writing slants to the right, while Allen's is more vertical. Zodiac's writing tended to be level with a baseline, while Allen's tended to slant up at the end of many words. In addition, almost every letter formation differs between the two writers. Note the lower case "d" for example: dramatically slanted to the right and close-looped by Zodiac, but vertical and often with an open loop by Allen. Aside from the fact that they both wrote in ink, there's not much similarity!
Similarities plus all the other circumstantial evidence, hmmm very interest ing. We shall see, DNA test ing being conduc ted right now. Tick tock, tick tock
A great example of forensic linguist is ted kosinski …
THIS VIDEO IS VERY CHILLING. THE ZODIAC KILLER WAS VERY EVIL TO MISPELL CERTAIN WORDS ON PURPOSE IN HIS LETTERS.
Allen bought a Most Dangerous game poster cuz he loved the movie so much and took marshalls writing stylistically for his zodiac letters. He then reproduced the letters using a template with whatever copy machine he had in hsi moms basement – hence why nothing ever matched.
Maybe wanted to be done with his spelling or thoughts as soon as possible could not slow down to write correctly or didn't like self
They know exactly who the zodiac was but there is a difference between knowing and being able to prove and convict.
Hi All. Looking for a bit of help in answering something that's bugging me, please: years ago I read Graysmiths book, the yellow Zodiac version. One thing (a suspect) that really stood out to me in it was a man from the other side of the country, New York. The man, from what I remember, was alleged to have travelled from New York to the west coast, SF, every time there was a Zodiac killing. I don't have the yellow book anymore – anyone know the suspect I am talking about, what's his name please? Thanks, Spence.
Wow. Thanks for that. So clear and intelligent. No supposition. Well explained. Good stuff
All wrong.
Mr. Rogers was the Zodiac killer. The whole TV show was a front.
I do not think the ciphers are any help in solving the case. I also have a learning disability where I drop letters while writing and make spelling mistakes and do not notice them until i look back at my writing later.
Waste of time .
NamUs #MP40945
“Linguists look at the language of the writing.” Oh really?
Ronnie pickerings dad it was
There was two people so I'm guessing cousins or an uncle and nephew or a father and son
Wh at a was te
Ross
Meh.
That was a painful 11 minutes. I already knew all of that, and they should have hired an actor to deliver this information. This guy is hard to stay with.
My understanding is Aurther L Allen was exonerated by DNA
Also I have searched intently for DNA results on Zodiac stamps and letters from 2019 tests. It cannot take this long for results. My thinking is they don't have a match with suspects, so their only hope is familial DNA on a genealogy website.
I believe this is a bonus featurette on the bonus material disc from the 2-disc bluray special edition of the movie but anyway thanks for made this available in YouTube …
Has anyone ever taken the extra lor missing letters to see what they may spell out, or if they're a part of the cypher?
Is it possible that ALA wrote for the zodiac and maybe that's why he cannot be discounted as being involved?
I think,,,, pretty many know Who knows WHO's war hes was hire,, and the code is not code
Its messeges,,,, as when killed,,, the suffering,,,, is us whos left,
Bottom line they dont know who the Zodiac killer was
I remember Sept 27th 1969 my family was at lake berryessa and it was my dads birthday I was not there but I remember the panic and fear The Zodiac created, not to mention the poor people lives he took. They will never know who the real killer was. It's obvious he was too smart for everyone.
Dude. It wasn't Arthur L. Let it go already.
Now I just feel terribly saddened; that little girl murder is so horrible, the poor little soul with no one to love and protect her.
I only do linguini analysis
This man is a human metronome.
I feel like the Linguistics guy is what George Lucas would look like if he shaved his beard
Two or three different people wrote the same letter to throw off the investigators.
Thr linguist nailed the child killing mom dead to rights. The linguist is justified to be at 5 on the scale or inconclusive. Yet Michael Mageau gave an 8 as far as identification of his assailant. The writing on Hartnell's Karman Ghia is Zodiac. Hartnell's pang of recognition of that door when viewing it in the evidence room is painful to watch. Zodiac trumps every case I can think of. Jack the Ripper is a close second.
Allen's handwriting was dramatically different from that of the Zodiac. At 9:41, note how Zodiac's writing slants to the right, while Allen's is more vertical. Zodiac's writing tended to be level with a baseline, while Allen's tended to slant up at the end of many words. In addition, almost every letter formation differs between the two writers. Note the lower case "d" for example: dramatically slanted to the right and close-looped by Zodiac, but vertical and often with an open loop by Allen. Aside from the fact that they both wrote in ink, there's not much similarity!
Similarities plus all the other circumstantial evidence, hmmm very interest ing. We shall see, DNA test ing being conduc ted right now. Tick tock, tick tock
A great example of forensic linguist is ted kosinski …
THIS VIDEO IS VERY CHILLING. THE ZODIAC KILLER WAS VERY EVIL TO MISPELL CERTAIN WORDS ON PURPOSE IN HIS LETTERS.
Allen bought a Most Dangerous game poster cuz he loved the movie so much and took marshalls writing stylistically for his zodiac letters. He then reproduced the letters using a template with whatever copy machine he had in hsi moms basement – hence why nothing ever matched.
Maybe wanted to be done with his spelling or thoughts as soon as possible could not slow down to write correctly or didn't like self
They know exactly who the zodiac was but there is a difference between knowing and being able to prove and convict.
Hi All.
Looking for a bit of help in answering something that's bugging me, please: years ago I read Graysmiths book, the yellow Zodiac version. One thing (a suspect) that really stood out to me in it was a man from the other side of the country, New York. The man, from what I remember, was alleged to have travelled from New York to the west coast, SF, every time there was a Zodiac killing.
I don't have the yellow book anymore – anyone know the suspect I am talking about, what's his name please?
Thanks,
Spence.
Wow. Thanks for that. So clear and intelligent. No supposition. Well explained. Good stuff