#919 Neil deGrasse Tyson explains Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle from Joe Rogan Experience #919

21 thoughts on “#919 Neil deGrasse Tyson explains Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle from Joe Rogan Experience #919”

1. So basically nothing can exist without an observer

2. Neil is fuckin awesome… No experiment can happen without the person carrying it out effecting the outcome.

3. Thats not Heisenbergs Unschärferelation, it is the influencing of the measurement by the measurement itself.
   The uncertainty priciple is the relation between place and movement, you are only able to measure one of them at the same time, one of the two becomes uncertain the clearer the other eppears

4. dope lol

5. WOW!!! Got it!!! I understand now.

6. Who else thought they were gonna talk about heisenberg from breaking bad?

7. Now I get it, thanks, Dr. Tyson!

8. Mr. Neal Degrasse.. please help me to devolop Blue Marvel

9. Tyson's mind is so lazy he couldn't collapse a wave function.

10. Quantum physicists say particles can exist as a potentiality in multiple place simultaneously but that's neither here nor there.

11. Joe”i’ll do it’ rogan

12. So does the act of puting a ruler next to your dick cause a change in the dimensions?

13. Around minute 2:30, if you take a bunch of those curved led screens and line them up in a semi circle, and with the right video source, as close to a holodeck we will get this decade.

14. starts at 3:10

15. what a cowboy????!!!!!

16. The observer effect is not as he describes, and it's not "simple". I just watched a vid where British quantum physicist Jim Al-Khalili said that whoever figured it out would get a Nobel prize.

17. Neil has a bad habit of talking over his interviewers. A lot.

18. incorrect

19. I was expecting him to explain how Heisenberg managed to reach 99.1% purity on his meth.

20. Hello could somebody who knows physics please clarify this bit with me. So it is the act of measuring the particle that collapses the particle and that is with reference to the measuring device. My question is, what is the measuring device doing exactly that is causing it to interact with the particle, second have we tried other detection devices do they show the exact same result or do they collapse the particle in a different way based on how it detects it. A person of pseudoscience may pose that the very act of setting up the apparatus of detection is the human observing the particle. What property of the detection device causes this change in the particle.

21. I should just stop paying for college here i am getting the best explanation for all the theorems for free on youtube

Comments are closed.