Closer To Truth – Physics of the Observer
Does the concept of observation have deep relevance in fundamental physics? What about in quantum physics where some kind of observation seems to be needed to transform “wave function” probabilities into actual events?
Click here to watch more interviews on physics of the observer http://bit.ly/2xhCcfQ
Click here to watch more interviews with David Wallace http://bit.ly/2wA1FRW
Click here to visit our website http://bit.ly/2xUAZgc
Click here to visit our main channel http://bit.ly/2xhIJXG
Source
Just like self-organization and self-simulation of matter makes phase transition transform non-life matter into 'life'. similarly the quantum field can self-simulate intelligent conscious 'observer', collapsing the field into fine tuned particles (matter), proving the Anthropic Principle, divine purpose and ID.
The problem is that of fusion. I believe real fusion needs an external A.I Solver. Since there is too much happening. So the Observer == A.I Solver
John David Best has his web site Vida İnstitute. He put my articles page in 'Timeflow Theory' 'http://vidainstitute.org/?page_id=656'. Vida Institute is intersting site. And my web site is http://www.timeflow.org
In your opinion, discovery of a planet is more exciting. Or, as I've presented in the attached article,
whether observing 'A very tiniest mass in the space, having completed its life, have been turning
into energy' would be more exciting or not ? It is my belief that, this observation will be the proof
of the General and the Special Theory of Relativity. This observation can be made only by NASA or
ESA. I hope that I will be able to see this consequence while I'm still alive.
This person falls for the dumb down way of look at quantum mechanics. In Heisenberg's words 'the other interpretations (such as Bohm or many worlds) are just nonsense'.
"We have to buy vast numbers of parallel universes"????? ….Holy Occum's razor Batman!
Sounds like a personified snake
his voice is not his….