Closer To Truth
How does the brain produce the mind? This is one of the most difficult problems in science, because how can physical qualities, no matter how complex and sophisticated, actually be mental experiences? Electrical impulses and chemical flows are not at all the kind of stuff that thoughts and feelings are. The physical and the mental are different categories.
Click here to watch more interviews on the mind-body problem http://bit.ly/2ooDcyW
Click here to watch more interviews with Alva Noë http://bit.ly/1DvCe5u
Click here to buy episodes or complete seasons of Closer To Truth http://bit.ly/1LUPlQS
For all of our video interviews please visit us at www.closertotruth.com
Source
The mind of a created man is an AI and Voice system that converts stored data into visible fake bodies and fake worlds to explore.
His response follows the idea that the mind is an illusion. The brain cannot produce consciousness without external factors whether those factors come from a simulated reality or actual reality.
who is this dumb fuck?
I agree with the presentation
Robert regarding consciousness you should interview Robert Lanza, or Rupert Spira that will be really amazing
The brain does not produce the mind and there is no mind-body problem.
Consciousness is fundamental and composes all of reality. Hence there aren't two different causal stories that need to be reconciled since there is only one type of substance and one type of causation: mental
sounds like a form of behaviorism.. lol like metaphysical behaviorism..
There are 5 observable categories of phenomena.
There is Form or Pattern. (shape)
There is Sensation. (dualistic feeling)
There is Perception. (Qualia/and label)
There is perception Of form ("square" "circle"…)
There is perception of sensation ("pleasant", "unpleasant"
If there is a word for a thing THAT is a perception.
There is Intention. (Will to action)
Intentions are informed by perceptions.
The basic intentions are
A. Move toward all that is 1. nourishing 2.pleasant 3 "good" 4. "beautiful" etc…
B. Move away from that which opposes A. If A and B are in the same locale either Take A or Push B out.
There is consciousness. (There is form consciousness) (There is feeling about form) (There is The (thought label) perception/evaluation "good" or "bad" or "pleasant" or "unpleasant" or "neutral"…
These Five aspects of observable reality do not include categories like "self" "world" "mind" "matter".
All phenomena can be explained in terms of these 5.
No phenomena require us to go into the realm of (unobservable) imagination and speculation
Matter is a perception fabricated in the imagination by intentions informed by form, sensation, other perceptions and an ALL MIGHTY PERCEPTION OF SELF.
When you look at the actual facts available to consciousness and strip all the Perceptions out; the Stories of universes and selves and all that WORD garbage, You are left with reality.
Anyone who speaks of "REALITY" has trodden directly through the pile of speculation and imagination.
It's hard to step in a pile and not get any on you.
Syntax cannot magically breed semantics and therefore computers cannot create consciousness.
Tell a computer to answer, "yes" when asked if it is conscious. Even a perfect simulation would just be an illusion. Descartes would even agree that the illusion isn't of consciousness, rather, we are being fooled into thinking the robot is conscious.
A first I thought he was talking bollocks, but he started to make sense
Fantastic…!
Where's Vilayanur S. Ramachandran when you need him?
This is one of the best episodes ever. They really had a good deep discussion and I loved the neuroplasticity based argument! I never thought about it like that. Although if you take a stem cell and move it to an organ it will start functioning like the other cells around it. That includes the liver and heart etc…so why think of consciousness any differently then say producing bile or pumping blood?