Consciousness Videos

Can God and Science Mix? | Episode 1605 | Closer To Truth



Closer To Truth

Science and religion each claims dominion over deep reality. But science and religion are not parallel. All should believe science, humanity’s common language, while religion has many skeptics. Featuring interviews with Willem Drees, J. Richard Gott III, David Ritz Finkelstein, Rodolfo R. Llinas, and Don Page.

Season 16, Episode 5 – #CloserToTruth

▶Register for free at CTT.com for subscriber-only exclusives: http://bit.ly/2GXmFsP

Closer To Truth host Robert Lawrence Kuhn takes viewers on an intriguing global journey into cutting-edge labs, magnificent libraries, hidden gardens, and revered sanctuaries in order to discover state-of-the-art ideas and make them real and relevant.

▶Free access to Closer to Truth’s library of 5,000 videos: http://bit.ly/376lkKN

Closer to Truth presents the world’s greatest thinkers exploring humanity’s deepest questions. Discover fundamental issues of existence. Engage new and diverse ways of thinking. Appreciate intense debates. Share your own opinions. Seek your own answers.

#Science #Religion

Source

Similar Posts

21 thoughts on “Can God and Science Mix? | Episode 1605 | Closer To Truth
  1. “Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent.

    Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent.

    Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil?

    Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God?”
    – Epicurus

  2. Don't worry, your true SELF is God. You just have to drop your chronic thinking 😃

    Consciousness is God. Every living being is a reflection of God in an imperfect mirror

    Read "be as you are" by David Goodman

    Science is our way of discovering the world but, world is like a persistent dream. To discover God we need to just wake up.

  3. Another fine example why philosophy and theology, should be abolished as degrees. There are never any answers. As an average educated individual, you could basically watch one of these types of videos and come to the same conclusion as mine: no answers ever, only a mishmash of names scattered thru history to fill your brain and make you think you know something about this. Fine to disagree with me, but let me know and I'll hold a going away party for your 100,000 dollars.

  4. Awesome content, I'm thankful to you for asking such questions to the top minds in the world and bringing their conceptions to everyone.

  5. The word of God is based on three world ages. One is a year 360 days, one is the precession 25,920 years and one is our 250 million year travel around our galaxy. Which does not take anything away from faith, hope and love. Evolve

  6. The common problem I find with these scientists, both believing and athiest, is pride. A little humility and God will talk to them himself.

  7. I really feel a sense of relief that someone can give this subject fair treatment. Of course I have to watch a few times to get on track with the conversations. Good stuff. Happy this man does what he does.

  8. WHY ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY:

    OVERLAY what is THE EYE in BALANCED RELATION to/WITH what is THE EARTH. Now, pay very close attention. (Notice the black space of THE EYE.)

    The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. THE EARTH is ALSO blue. Now, LOOK down at what is the EARTH/GROUND. The tides are a linked AND BALANCED electromagnetic/gravitational manifestation or form. Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. THE MOON is ALSO blue. Think about it ALL. Consider the ORANGE SUN/LAVA. LOOK at what is the BLUE SKY. GRAVITATIONAL force/ENERGY IS proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. E=mc2 is DIRECTLY AND FUNDAMENTALLY DERIVED FROM F=ma.

    THE MOTION of WHAT IS THE MOON IS relative (or relational) to WHAT IS THE EARTH (AS what is THE EARTH/GROUND), AS gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. GREAT.

    The tides are electromagnetic/gravitational IN BALANCE. Time DILATION proves that ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. E=mc2 is DIRECTLY AND FUNDAMENTALLY DERIVED FROM F=ma. A PHOTON may be placed at the center of what is THE SUN (as A POINT, of course), AS the reduction of SPACE is offset by (or BALANCED with) the SPEED OF LIGHT; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY. SO, objects fall at the SAME RATE (neglecting air resistance, of course) regardless of their material COMPOSITION. In fact, E=mc2 AND F=ma PROVE that ALL of SPACE is NECESSARILY electromagnetic/gravitational IN BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Great !!! Gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY are linked AND BALANCED opposites, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY are linked AND BALANCED IN AND OUT of SPACE AND TIME, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND describes what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE. NOW, it is quite CLEAR why the falling MAN feels no gravity. "Mass"/ENERGY involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE consistent WITH/AS what is BALANCED electromagnetic/gravitational force/ENERGY, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. (Energy has/involves GRAVITY, AND ENERGY has/involves inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE.) GREAT.

    Consider THE MAN who is standing on what is THE EARTH/GROUND. Touch AND feeling BLEND, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. The BALANCE of being AND EXPERIENCE is essential in conjunction WITH the UNDERSTANDING. BALANCE and completeness go hand in hand. THINK !!! (Outer "space" involves full inertia, AND it is fully invisible AND black.) THOUGHTS ARE INVISIBLE. The ultimate unification of physics/physical experience combines, BALANCES, and includes opposites. The DOME of a person's EYE is ALSO visible. CONSEQUENTLY, our experience is NECESSARILY that of the BALANCED MIDDLE DISTANCE in/of SPACE that is BETWEEN what is THE SUN AND c (the SPEED OF LIGHT); AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. GREAT.

    Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. ACCORDINGLY, the rotation of what is THE MOON MATCHES it's revolution. Great. Now, it is time to further discuss and describe what is THE MOON.

    The viscosity of LAVA is, in fact, BETWEEN that of WATER AND THE EARTH/GROUND. Now, at EYE LEVEL/BODY HEIGHT, witness the FLAT, SETTING, AND ORANGE SUN (with the SPACE around it THEN going invisible AND VISIBLE IN BALANCE). Great.

    The COMPOSITION of lunar rocks IS, in fact, practically IDENTICAL to that of Earth rocks. MOREOVER, the curvature or shape of THE MOON MATCHES that of the EARTH/GROUND (given a clear horizon, that is). THE MOON and THE EARTH are linked AND BALANCED opposites, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Hence, the relation to what is THE MOON upon THE TIDES is clearly established. Consider LAVA AND the ORANGE SUN. THE SUN and THE EARTH/GROUND are linked AND BALANCED opposites, AS gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY are linked AND BALANCED opposites; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. The tides NECESSARILY involve BALANCED electromagnetic/gravitational force/ENERGY. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY. GREAT.

    By Frank DiMeglio

  9. With regard to the Scriptures, if you move in the allegorical direction, you will have problems with the rest of the bible. Like, if you take the six days of creation in Genesis 1 allegorically, you will have a huge problem when you realize that the Lord taught the creation account literally.

    Believe it or not, having a good-enough grasp of Quantum Physics allows me to comfortably go the literal road. Didn't scientists say that our universe is but a simulation of a much bigger reality which we cannot as yet perceive? Didn't they say that distance and time are but persistent illusions? As I see it, science is catching up.

    And where does Quantum Physics fit in all of this for me? When the Lord said "I go and prepare a place for you", is this place being prepared spirit, or material, albeit with more dimentionalities than we have in our reality? Will we have spirit floors, walls, doors, tables and chairs? Or would these be material with more than four dimensions?

    If angels are not omnipresent but have locality, it means they exist in a created universe outside of our own, yet not outside of creation per se. Angels are, like us, created beings. 

    So, literal or allegorical? I say go literal when it is not clearly indicated as allegorical.

Comments are closed.

WP2Social Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com