Consciousness Videos

Faster than Light (FTL) Travel- Consciousness breakthroughs in Tech



Chris Lehto

Cognitive Scientist Donald Hoffman argues SpaceTime has had a good run but is not fundamental to the universe. 99% of scientists believe looking smaller and smaller will give us the keys to spacetime but what we have found is the opposite. SpaceTime is not fundamental to the universe because it cannot account for conscious experience. Therefore, something is behind spacetime, and it appears linked to consciousness.

Imagine the breakthroughs when mainstream science catches up!

Thanks for watching, liking, and subscribing! It really helps the channel.
Support the channel at Patreon.com/chrislehto
Join the DeSci movement at UAPsociety.com

Watch the Full Donald Hoffman-Lex Fridman interview here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=reYdQYZ9Rj4

Watch my video on the Consciousness-Link evidence here:
Did we just find the UAP-consciousness link?
https://youtu.be/uuPuoKqWgLE

Take Bernardo Kastrup’s excellent Analytic Idealism Course here:
(IV is my favorite episode)
https://www.essentiafoundation.org/analytic-idealism-course/

Thanks for reading,
Regards,
Chris

Chapters
00:00 Intro
00:59 SpaceTime Limits Us – Hoffman
03:37 Our Mind can Blind Us – Kastrup
08:24 Continued Remarkable Breakthroughs

Links in the video:
New Experiments Show Consciousness Affects Matter ~ Dean Radin, PhD
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nRSBaq3vAeY

History of Physics
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YTeOs24fNHo

Einstein vs. Newton Space and Time
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U-ZtaG7OqO8

Source

Similar Posts

20 thoughts on “Faster than Light (FTL) Travel- Consciousness breakthroughs in Tech
  1. I have been testing this theory for many many years. When you change your mind about something, you change reality as we understand it. Simpsons didnt predict anything, it focused millions of minds on the same event therefore creating said event. What you focus on, you create more of. That's the essence of our nature. That's also why the powers that be spend so much money and energy to get us fighting each other and disagreeing about everything. Understand now why control of Hollywood is so important to them? Understand why control of mainstream media is so important to them? They seem to understand your true nature, do you?

  2. I wonder if it is possible for inspiration that seems to come from nowhere actually does come from nowhere; such as the universe itself? What if the universe itself is conscious and we, as individuals, are unique aspects of it. And it has the ability to communicate itself to us because we are directly connected to it. There is more space within our bodies than there is solid matter; space made of the same fabric that we see when we look at the night sky. It permeates our bodies. There is an uncanny resemblance to the brain's neuropaths and the filament of the population distribution of galaxies.

  3. If the space was expanding so fast that galaxies would appear to be going away from us at the speed of light or greater (as the guy said) we wouldn't see them. The light from them would never reach us. And we do see all galaxies that were created after the Big Bang. So maybe it's a good idea to get familiar with basic astronomy stuff if you want to make bold claims about it.

  4. What about animals? dolphins, orcas, ravens, zebras, rabbits, mice, worms? I have trouble finding the separation between human and animal, or human and early versions of humans. If this is all true then where is that line?

  5. If actual space time locations differ from each other in some way then it would be possible to measure those locational differences and perhaps be able to move matter directly to those locations by typing into whatever resident frequency might distinguish that location from any number of others.

    I could see alien craft using a similar frequency driven technology. The human brain is after all an organic computer. In order to distinguish thoughts and emotions and other inputs, each input would by necessity need to be classified according to some sort of frequency. Mapping and measuring frequencies associated with commands necessary to move a ship would allow for near instantaneous response from the ship allowing a pilot to merge with his craft seemlessly.

  6. Quantum entanglement in the universe binds particles together.
    If we can entangle particles in the laboratory, then it can happen in nature.
    Look at Buckminsterfullerene's. We created them in the laboratory thinking they were novel.
    The astronomers discovered them drifting around a star in deep space.
    Where could atoms or molecules be entangled? Explosions of stars, or simply in the process of stars burring.
    The entangled particles fly out into space bonded together with particles in the opposite direction.
    The universe is connected at the atomic level.

  7. has anyone seen the documentary first contact? their is a lot of compelling evidence in it but nothing I could conclude as fact yet. A part that sticks out to me from the doc after watching this video is SPOILERS** the ET that was captured telepathically told the doctor that was working on him that it feels bad for humanity because we can do everything they can its just we don't know how and we are completely disconnected from our spirituality. spirituality id assume has a lot to do with Consciousness and probably telepathic communication lol.

  8. You should start "The Lehto Forum" where people that are either interested in UFO's or have seen them…OR have evidence… can get together at a yearly conference in Las Vegas. I would totally pay for a ticket if such a thing existed. Is there even a UAP conference anywhere? Something like the porn convention and the hacker convention combined?

  9. I've been saying the same thing for years and years but nobody ever listens to me. Just watch any of Dr. Dean Radin's videos on "consciousness and the observer effect". This channel keeps getting better and better. Keep up the good work, brother!

  10. Donald Hoffman came on here and blatantly lied about the conclusions of Nima Arkani Ahmed. Nim specifically Rejects as "foolishness" the concept that Consciousness creates the universe or affects it. I have attached a video of an interview where he States that specifically. That a scientist can come on here and blatantly lie about the conclusions of another scientist in order to support his own theories is exactly why we should not be looking to YouTube to educate us. The commentary I refer to starts around 5:53 of the video to 6:02 https://youtu.be/OAvd0XCWtCk

  11. Brains do sound like different dimensions. All experience the same thing, yet from slightly different perceptions, from that they can experience complete different feelings and views and see the world at a slightly different angle. It seems the universe in order to exist needs to be observed.

    The universe from my perspective didn't exist until I was born and vice versa.

    What if consciousness is the weakest but most valuable link in the chain of reality.

    If nothing was born and life didn't exist. Would the universe exist? Life gives the universe reason and if it needs reason, then what is that reason going to…a higher conscience.
    No wonder images of deep space look like scans of the brain. It's one big brain itself. IMO lol.

Comments are closed.

WP2Social Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com