The Ling Space
This is an updated version of our interview with Daniel Dennett from last month, now with remastered audio! The original video is here: https://youtu.be/U57TQEOWxg8
We’re really excited to have gotten to interview Dr. Dennett recently! He holds the title of University Professor in the Department of Philosophy at Tufts University, as well as the co-director of their Center for Cognitive Studies. He’s also the author of a number of books on evolution, consciousness, memes, language, and more, including Consciousness Explained, Darwin’s Dangerous Idea, and Intuition Pumps and Other Tools for Thinking.
We got to ask him about a lot of great topics, including:
– the role of language in spreading culture
– what linguists and philosophers can learn from each other
– whether the gap between linguists and the general public is closing
– computers and whether they’ll be able to use language in a human-like way
– a question from one of our followers about whether we have a dedicated mental language
And more! Hope you all enjoy it.
Some related videos:
Our previous interview with Steven Pinker: https://youtu.be/piJBmPh5jFU
How do computers understand our speech?: https://youtu.be/FI9IJteS-5Yda
How logical is language?: https://youtu.be/lw4ykgRtv3Q
Find us on all the social media worlds:
Tumblr: http://thelingspace.tumblr.com/
Twitter: http://twitter.com/TheLingSpace
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/thelingspace/
And at our website, http://www.thelingspace.com/ !
You can also find our store at the website, http://thelingspace.storenvy.com/
We also have forums to discuss this episode, and linguistics more generally.
Looking forward to next week!
Source
Moti, it's supposed to be Lieber*men*!
I think he is misrepresenting Chomsky as denying evolution in terms of development of Language. What Chomsky objects to is the notion that the capacity for language, as a system of digital infinity, could have been a gradual evolution, rather than a simple mutation that had enormous consequences. To keep it simple, his argument is hinged off the idea of digital infinity, such a system cannot gradually evolve gradually for the simple fact that any fraction of infinity is infinity, and languages are infinite systems.
I like this interview.