Jordan Peterson is a clinical psychologist and tenured professor of psychology at the University of Toronto. You can check out all Dr. Peterson’s self-improvement writing programs at www.selfauthoring.com
Bret Weinstein is a biology professor at Evergreen State College in Olympia, WA. Currently he is in the middle of an intense controversy that has been documented by the Wall Street Journal, New York Times, and several other mainstream media outlets. Sign up for a free crash course on Evolutionary Thinking at http://bretweinstein.net/early
PowerfulJRE
Source
Joe Rogan Experience #1006 – Jordan Peterson & Bret Weinstein
2:17:55 There's no "middle end". End be definition is either high or low)
Refreshing to see a civil and humane discuss of different ideas on a neutral platform
Bret Weinstein oozes class. If more people could emulate him we might not fall to polarisation.
I wish Peterson was American at times. #POTUSPeterson.
54:57 sums up why certain people will never be creative nor understand how creativity works.
Your comedian buddy is failing to acknowledge the fact that races other than white can be racist. Lots of Trump haters are racist.
It's quite unique on YouTube that a video from YouTube more than a year old still has an active and interesting comment section.
In Charlottesville there were true Patriots there protesting the tearing down of statues, and were beaten physically by the radical left. That’s what I thought Trump was talking about.
In charlottsville there was multiple factions there were patriots antifa neo-nazis and a bunch of others violence broke out on all sides because tensions reached a critical mass when Trump said that there was unfortunate behavior coming from both sides that's what he meant
1:21:00 one of the interesting areas where the concept of fact and wisdom are blurred is for example Chi or Ki. Scientifically we can not qualify Chi or Ki, so from a scientific position it could be considered to be false when it comes to facts. However that does is not necessarily true. I am a Reiki practitioner and as such have had excellent feedback from clients regarding the benefits they experienced from our session. Is it 100% placebo??? Possibly, however I believe that I can feel the energy and so do the majority of my clients.
While I admire Jordan Peterson and feel that his integrity is (for the most part sound), this interview has been one of many whereupon he either "dances around" the Zionist question or stays reticent. The Zionist "narration" which , through fear, is most certainly one that is open for discussion and cannot be thought of as something which can be overlooked. Failure to do so merely raises great doubt in the overall universal argument.
World Almanac numbers concerning their true victimization and responsibility, differ greatly those of zionists. If Peterson is adamant to unconditionally present the actual truth of matters on various scales, he is therefore not one to be given license to "cherry pick" ultimate truths and fallacies but has accepted the responsibility to remain transparent on matters, across the board.
Peterson's stance against "tribalism" , equality of outcome and cognitive dissonance need to remain absolute. Avoidance of any aspect of these matters merely raise questions towards the ultimate pursuit.
Rules against eating pigs much like the belief in God himself stem from economical wishes of monarchic leaders and are wholly unrelated to the betterment of mankind. The things that are for the betterment for mankind are the hook you use in order to stuff the rest of it down the believers throat, disentangling this mess by first dismantling religious authority must be very high up on the TODO list for humanity if it is to survive the looming challenges.
Yeeted on ‘em
Great video
When Bret speaks, it seems like sometimes he’s trying to hold back a smile. I think because as he discusses things, he enjoys the fact that someone might learn from him.
Such great conversations in this podcast. Need more like this everywhere.
Who is here in 4060?
Thank you Joe Rogan, for making deep philosophical discussions mainstream, We need this!
They should read a french anthropologist called Emmanuel Todd he explains why family traditions are transposed into political orientation for example for germans it's authority and inequality with transmission only to the elder son which explains why nazi germany could consider other people like lesser people than germans. On the other end of the spectrum they did universal alphabetization in the 17th century way before everybody else cause they feel like continuity and stability are important and therefore transmission. For example for the french the tradition of equality comes from equal inheritance even with women this made a nation attached to equality into his political system which means a welfare state that is way, way stronger than US or UK model which means maybe unemployment but way less poverty and way less inequality at the same time. It's neither good or bad you just need to understand that the family environnement structure and value is transposed into political system, it's exactly the reason why comunnautary authoritarian and egalitarian family system like in russia and east asia could produce totalitarian communism. Same kinda of family system that were present in center of Italy were the communist party was thriving.
They got a huge blind spot on this they should at least read his work before commenting something they don't understand like they did…
Stick that mic in your mouth. Yeeeaah suck it..
Thats it.
Oh yeah.
When Jordan briefly dismisses Islam he uses objective reality to dismiss it as a religion of low utility. Since he can do that he obviously knows, deep down somewhere, that this is true of all religions and narratives and "wisdoms" and that this, ultimately renders them obsolete. All of them. Sam Harris is not wrong, at least on that count. Objective reality is the solid foundation from which we can judge. Also thanks Joe for interjecting on the use of "truth" which I think Jordan still has a problem with. If we replaced "utility" it would probably sound more like what he's really saying.
Updated fairy tales are nonsense because modern people don’t appeal to those forms of knowledge propagation. Updating the 10 commandments is pointless because a scientific, rational world doesn’t operate along the precepts of religious dogma anymore.