Language

Jordan Peterson Debates Linguistics Professor On Gender Pronouns



Social Justice Fails

Jordan Peterson Q&A At Lafayette College On Various Topics Such As Systematic Racism & Religion. Jordan Bernt Peterson is a Canadian clinical psychologist, public intellectual, and professor of psychology at the University of Toronto. His main areas of study are in abnormal, social, and personality psychology, with a particular interest in the psychology of religious and ideological belief, and the assessment and improvement of personality and performance.

►Follow On Facebook: http://bit.ly/2eOy0wE
►Support On Patreon: http://bit.ly/2eSMOtV

Original Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v6H2HmKDbZA .

Source

Similar Posts

29 thoughts on “Jordan Peterson Debates Linguistics Professor On Gender Pronouns
  1. Jordan Peterson is actually doing a service to the genuine transgender community… by eschewing these ridiculous third person pronouns and made-up terms he allows a transgender woman or male to gain more acceptance in our society as a whole. Political correctness is a cancer that permeates every strata of our world

  2. Jordan's argument is basically that no matter which position you take there will be unavoidable error, so why give people the power to dictate such a matter when the level of disrespect is not changed by law and oversight relating to the proper pronoun use. They are arguing two different angles so no overarching objective conclusions are formed which I would blame mostly on the professor in the crowd who won't take Jordan's answers at face value and extrapolate to further the discussion but instead reverberates a position that is built on false assumptions and acceptance of the proper pronoun motif that Jordan doesn't even agree with to begin with. The professor focuses more so on his delivery and how he auditorily sounds rather than what he is actually presenting; the substance, which made for a confusing and counterproductive exchange.

  3. If you are a he and think you are a she and vice versa , I feel for you. If you have a hissy because a pronoun triggers you, I don't give a shit. You have xy or xx chromosomes. He's and She's. The problem lies in your brain. You are weak and thin-skinned. Too bad, so sad and I don't give a shit. Do not tell me what to speak and what to think. YOU are NOT important. None of us are.

  4. The problem is that the authorities do not understand the difference between the good of society and the individual good (read "personal entitlement").

  5. Poor Peterson, having to stoop to the level of this teacher who can't assert himself. Granted, he has the Damocles sword hanging over him in the form of the PC authorities. We need a 2nd uncle Adi.

  6. Erring on the side of generosity and compassion… Laugh laugh laugh, seemingly naive response. challenging any authoritarian figure in any public forum is not the action of someone deserving compassion in my opinion. I reserved compassion and generosity for those who hold their challenges for a private forum and communicate with respect

  7. How do they pack the place with so many snowflakes? I see a victim society forming and we are raising followers that can't think for them selfs. It's time to draw a line and say enough is enough. Call a boy a boy a man a man and a left a loon.

  8. I am never going to understand the disconnect between recognizing personal compliance between two people who have unalienable rights and government mandate that removes those rights from one side or the other. How is it not incredibly simple to understand?

    A trans person can choose to be trans, identify as whatever they wish BUT no one can impose their personal choice onto society. If anything is a slippery slope, thinking you can write personal preference into law is most certainly one. And, more importantly, discrimination laws have long existed in favor of much more important issues than what word someone used to address you. Talk about petty selfishness.

    But, here we see how each person is clearly much more interested in derailing Peterson's argument long before acknowledging the logic of what he is saying.

    This is a prime example of the deeply selfish posturing that many "progressives" consistently and unknowingly put on display. They care more about proving they are right than they do about actually being right. Which is, ironically, about as far from progress as one could get.

  9. This whole trangender identity thing is bs. …it's simple.
    I work at a labor and delivery unit. .
    I help deliver babies either vaginal or c section.
    Baby comes out what do physicians do ? When parents elect to have a surprise gender birth?
    Physicians look at the babies external genitals to determine the sex/gender of the baby. ..simple as that male or female….
    Wish these trangender apologists go the operating room witness a few births and look at how basic this is…..it'll give them a new perspective.

  10. I would never hIre a Student out of ANY University that Blocks freedom of expression. You cannot legislate thought. It is amazing how past Gov'ts focus on these issues, but Cannot and Will not review how to IMPROVE Economics and Taxation and health care etc the Backbone of our society.
    These issues are a DISTRACTION so the Gov't can avoid Progress in what really matters to 99.9999999999% of peoples everyday Worries.!!The Gov't Will however squander Tens to 100s of million dollars on this stupid issue!!! Words do not FEED and HOUSE and Improve Life for ALL.!!
    People who address People in a social setting can use MR- MISS- MRS etc. The people who want to use the New Jargon can, but should not expect ALL to use this New jargon. !! When the Bank comes to foreclose on your home and you demand to be called @!#$^^^EGW !!! The bank will still take your home!. Your NEW coming out Gender Identity is 2000 yrs OLD it is not New. Get over it and focus on helping everyone!! Being Different is Not New. We need to Kick out Gov'ts here in Canada who focus on Pissing away Tax dollars on these Issues. If we took the Tax dollars from the so called Gender Identity folks we could get maybe 1/10th of 1 percent of taxes so we are using others Tax dollars to defend a Non Issue.We still have to offer Health care etc to these lost souls. Call yourselves whatever you want BUT it has to BE ZERO COST to the rest of US. Please begin the ATTACKS !!!!TADA!!!!!

  11. This is perhaps the only subject that I find myself in complete agreement with Jordan. I can’t understand how someone can be so open to logic and reason on one subject and be so absolutely obtuse on subjects of objective morality or the influence of ‘Judaeo Christian morality’ on the way the civilised world is structured.

  12. As soon as I heard the linguist sound like a fag I couldn't take him seriously. Because I knew he was going to start some drama. Typical. At least he was smart enough to back off and settle down.

  13. I love listening to this guy talk. I could waste so much time just listening to him talk. Haha.

    The problem I think in today's society is that the average person, especially Americans, aren't very bright. And because majority rules, they end up dictating where Society goes. And even though the intellectuals using logic and backup information prove our correctness the vast majority of times, we are overwhelmed by the dumber majority.

    So how does a minority influence change to a logically flawed majority??

  14. I think Dr Peterson has a real chance for change. So glad that he is Canadian. If he was an American, he'd be so full of himself and pushing everyone's buttons. Trigger trigger everywhere. Drama like Ann Coulter or Nancy Grace.

Comments are closed.

WP2Social Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com