Videos

Steven Pinker's Tweet Regarding Female Leaders & the COVID Crisis (THE SAAD TRUTH_1054)



Gad Saad

Tweets in question:
https://twitter.com/GadSaad/status/1261690125161037827?s=20
https://twitter.com/GadSaad/status/1261687432992509959?s=20
__________________________________
Support THE SAAD TRUTH via PayPal: https://www.paypal.me/GadSaad

THE SAAD TRUTH online store:
http://www.teespring.com/stores/the-saad-truth

Support THE SAAD TRUTH via Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/GadSaad

Support THE SAAD TRUTH via SubscribeStar:
https://www.subscribestar.com/the-saad-truth

Like my Facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/Dr.Gad.Saad

Follow me on Twitter: https://twitter.com/GadSaad (@GadSaad)
__________________________________
Source for Thumbnail Image: https://bit.ly/2ZbJC5B

Source

Similar Posts

45 thoughts on “Steven Pinker's Tweet Regarding Female Leaders & the COVID Crisis (THE SAAD TRUTH_1054)
  1. Pinker is hit and miss. He talks utter nonsense sometimes. Dishonest and or delusional too at times. Would be very careful about trusting him.

  2. I realized that Mr Pinker had fallen to the dark side after reading "Enlightenment Now".

    This was most apparent in the last section which addressed the rise of Trumpism, in which he didn't bother presenting any Pro-Trumpism arguments in order to debunk them. It was a disappointing end to a book that started so well.

    There is widespread push to demasculinize society, that some refer to as "the bonobo protocol". After hearing Pinker talk about female intelligence in defense of AI, it is clear to me that he is a part of this push, and it displays an absolutely stunning naivete in such an accomplished academic. It is also active participation in a uniquely human monstrosity of a crime.

    I'm not a trained evolutionary psychologist. I'm also not a trained carpenter. But when I see a disjointed, crooked house, it is plainly obvious that it's a defective construction, regardless of what a trained carpenter would tell me to believe.

  3. I do agree with the Abrahamic religions when they say women ruin kings and nations as rulers. They over micromanage and make decisions on emotions (empathy has no place in battle) so they would weaken a nations strength! I'll never vote for a woman!

  4. Pinker knows well that women need to be placated….This is nothing other than a guy being truly sexist and telling women in power that “they are special little angels.” “They’re even doing better than men.” “Just so amazing.

  5. Some commenters here may not be aware of elephant in the room, Pinkers' third wife Rebecca Goldstein is super left, super woke, and usually off with the fairies from what Ive seen and an obvious influence on her mild mannered male companion.

  6. Jacinda Ardern is the most incompetent Prime Minister in New Zealand’s history. New Zealand should have closed its borders in early March and gone to Level 2-2.5, instead Ardern waited until late March and put NZ into a Level 4 which was unnecessary.

  7. Why are you speaking of ovaries and testicles? Male and female brains are different on average, so we would expect them to do better or worse on average. Now of course there are so many variables you'd have to control before you could make a precise assessment, so I still agree with the general sentiment of the video.

  8. I'm also seeing that countries led by women are the most liable to lose their identity and therefore their freedom, something we can never buy back! By the way, I am a woman and believe in equality but not superiority!

  9. Women did Not Build the World, they provided the Man-Power to achieve it.
    Postmodernist Marxism, is the Most Schitzoid philosophy Ever, to Pollute the Halls of Learning and Human Society.

  10. How do you know that gender will not emerge as a significant predictor unless you unpackaged gender into the underlying variables? Have you done the stepwise regression yourself? Nobody does regressions with ALL the possible predictors. They do it with what they think are some of the RELEVANT predictors. You seem to think that a strong leadership based in empathy is not one of them. You would rather criticize your warped perception of the left than leaders who are Machiavellian, narcissistic, and psychopathic, like Trump. I am not political, but you are definitely nothing but politically biased. By the way, there are some obvious predictors of how a country would fair in containing COVID-19. One of them is the degree to which the national leader has the dark triad of personality. Some others are the degree to which the health care system is driven by the profit motive and the degree to which the news media is fragmented and spreading scientific misinformation. Others are cultural psychological factors like the degree of cultural tightness/looseness, relational mobility, and the degree to which cultures tolerate egocentrism (i.e., doesn’t perceive egocentrism as childish and immature). Check out Michele Gelfand’s work on tightness/looseness, Jonathan Haidt’s work on the dark psychology of the media, Steve Heine’swork in the self-enhancement motive, and Shinobu Kitayama’s work on relational mobility. While you are busy spewing your political vile, other scientific psychologists have already been doing good work on trying to explain cultural variation in COVID-19 responses.

  11. They keep using nz as the example of success. Nz has 14 people on an island. You can’t cases if you don’t have people.

  12. I remember Pinker making similar comments years ago when I still listened to the Big Think channel. He ascribed all sorts of negative personality traits to male leaders. Then he said, "There's a group of people who have none of these flaws. They're called women…"

    Pinker probably doesn't believe any of it to be true. He just wants to be 'in' with his political crowd.

  13. So…You think Ovaries & Testicles are the only differences between Men & Women?
    Ever heard of the Big 5 Personality Traits?
    No wonder you disagree with Jordan Peterson all the time because you must be wrong on many other Topics too!

  14. Amazing that academics can put their absurd Liberal biases so brazenly ahead of common sense. Pinker can't be too bright if this is an example of his reasoning.

  15. For goodness sake, Gad, get off your soap box. My guess is that Pinker’s comment was said in jest and, anyway, all ‘suggestive’ means is that the question is worth pondering. I wouldn’t buy it, personally, and I doubt whether Pinker would. Maggie Thatcher used to call the ministers that expressed concerns about her brutal policies ‘Wets’. Nicola Sturgeon, leader of the Scottish Government is totally ‘power mad’.

    On the other hand, Angela Merkel presides over a nation which has been far more successful in treating patients with Covid-19 than the UK has. But my hunch is that the German advantage was connected to the decentralisation of health provision rather than the sex of the leader.

    Having said all that, I think it would be ‘nice’ if more nations around the world were led by women. After all, women make up fifty percent of the human race. When you think of all the dictators that there are around now and have been in the past, are there any women amongst them? So, are these not fair questions at least to ask?

  16. I commented on a video from BBC news channel, "Those days when wearing the niqab was a controversy in some parts of the western world. Now look what people are made to wear." Reason being, they are both a form of clothing that covers your nose and lips. A user commented on my comment "and your "logic" brings us to the equation of God with a virus, congratulations!" and another user "Men should also give birth. That's not really fair is it?". Was my logic not sound?

  17. When women's natural empathy goes rogue from childlessness, they end up with misdirected sympathies for the worst criminal propensities in humanity, i.e., Islamists, communists, terrorists.
    It's like someone with a perfectly good hammer, desperately looking for a nail.
    And like wise little Ben Shapiro once said, "Sometimes you hit a nail, sometimes you hit a puppy."

  18. While I agree the data is not suggestive, there are other factors to consider. Such as countries where women have the potential to be elected as leaders vs countries without any female leaders. This changes the discussion from the inherent differences between male and female leaders, to societies that are open to female leaders vs ones that aren’t. I’m not saying this difference is statistically probably or even there at all. It’s that just the logic is flawed when you focus on one factor of the equation and debunk it and ignore other factors that may be at play

  19. Maybe many countries that have women leaders are also wealthy countries that can afford better health and sanitation suggesting that yes those ovaries obviously are suggestive of more successful results.

Comments are closed.

WP2Social Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com