Videos

The Future of Artificial Intelligence: Crash Course AI #20



CrashCourse

Today, in our final episode of Crash Course AI, we’re going to look towards the future. We’ve spent much of this series explaining how and why we don’t have the Artificial General Intelligence (or AGI) that we see in the movies like Bladerunner, Her, or Ex Machina. Siri frequently doesn’t understand us, we probably shouldn’t sleep in our self-driving cars, and those recommended videos on YouTube and Netflix often aren’t what we really want to watch next. So let’s talk about what we do know, how we got here, and where we think it’s all headed. Thanks so much everyone for watching!
Don’t forget to subscribe to Jabril’s channel here!
http://youtube.com/c/jabrils
And you can find some more free recourses to learn about AI below!
https://course.fast.ai/
https://www.coursera.org/learn/ai-for-everyone
https://www.coursera.org/learn/machine-learning
https://pytorch.org/tutorials/beginner/deep_learning_60min_blitz.html
https://www.kaggle.com/learn/overview
https://www.kaggle.com/competitions?sortBy=grouped&group=general&page=1&pageSize=20&category=gettingStarted

Crash Course AI is produced in association with PBS Digital Studios:
https://www.youtube.com/pbsdigitalstudios

Crash Course is on Patreon! You can support us directly by signing up at http://www.patreon.com/crashcourse

Thanks to the following patrons for their generous monthly contributions that help keep Crash Course free for everyone forever:

Eric Prestemon, Sam Buck, Mark Brouwer, Efrain R. Pedroza, Matthew Curls, Indika Siriwardena, Avi Yashchin, Timothy J Kwist, Brian Thomas Gossett, Haixiang N/A Liu, Jonathan Zbikowski, Siobhan Sabino, Jennifer Killen, Nathan Catchings, Brandon Westmoreland, dorsey, Kenneth F Penttinen, Trevin Beattie, Erika & Alexa Saur, Justin Zingsheim, Jessica Wode, Tom Trval, Jason Saslow, Nathan Taylor, Khaled El Shalakany, SR Foxley, Yasenia Cruz, Eric Koslow, Caleb Weeks, Tim Curwick, DAVID NOE, Shawn Arnold, William McGraw, Andrei Krishkevich, Rachel Bright, Jirat, Ian Dundore

Want to find Crash Course elsewhere on the internet?
Facebook – http://www.facebook.com/YouTubeCrashCourse
Twitter – http://www.twitter.com/TheCrashCourse
Tumblr – http://thecrashcourse.tumblr.com
Support Crash Course on Patreon: http://patreon.com/crashcourse
CC Kids: http://www.youtube.com/crashcoursekids
#CrashCourse #MachineLearning #ArtificialIntelligence

Source

Similar Posts

31 thoughts on “The Future of Artificial Intelligence: Crash Course AI #20
  1. Kinda related: Andrew Yang is the ONLY candidate I've seen running that not only talks about this tuff, he understands the potential, inevitability, and risks of it.

  2. Process automation to hyper automation

    In 2020, we would begin to see the rise of hyper automation, which is the meeting point of intelligence driven by AI and ML with autonomy driven by robotic and cognitive process automation. Hyper automation would help support dynamic and complex business processes including loan processing, insurance claims, warehouse dispatch and others. This would provide the unique advantage of mimicking user actions on terminals like carrying out transactions and generating dynamic content contextually to deliver on speed, accuracy, reliability and reduced costs.

  3. The future doesnt seem as cool as we think

    You should see how china use AI in scary way to force their children to study hard.

    Channel : Wall street journal

  4. Future of Artificial Intelligence? Watch the "Second Renaissance" episode of the Animatrix and see mankind's enslavement to machines. That's a taste of our future, a preview of things to come if we dont treat AI with equal respect.

  5. Keep in mind predicting the future is a tricky business you can't take into account undiscovered discoveries that have yet to be discovered, to increase or accelerate the discovery of more advanced artificial intelligence.

  6. The unibomber said that technology leads to oppression. The reason given for this is that the newest technology is first accessed by the wealthy ruling class, and that they monopolize technology to rule the oppressed masses.

    Of course if this were true you would find that only the ruling class and the wealthy would have access to the most dangerous technology, and that barriers would be placed so that common people could not weaponize technology in a manner that the ruling class or wealthy do.

Comments are closed.

WP2Social Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com