Consciousness Videos

The OBSERVER EFFECT of QUANTUM PHYSICS says: “Your THOUGHTS affect REALITY”



ART OF SPIRIT – Awaken!

http://www.artofspirit.ca/ (source: “What the Bleep Do We Know”) This is one of the key ideas from quantum physics that baffles most people. The philosopher in us screams that something is wrong with the way we understand reality. In fact, I would ask anyone viewing this to come to an honest conclusion: either a) our consciousness (mental activity, perception, observation) effects the behavior of reality (at least on the scale of the tiny), or b) a different conclusion. Personally, I can’t come to any other conclusion – can you? Although this seems very bizarre from the view of classical physics, from the view of consciousness theory and spirituality it fits perfectly.

Source

Similar Posts

41 thoughts on “The OBSERVER EFFECT of QUANTUM PHYSICS says: “Your THOUGHTS affect REALITY”
  1. Wait what if observation not by seeing but by interacting wouldn't an interaction like hitting the wall force it to act like a marble and wouldn't you seeing it force it to abide by laws of the universe and give up it's impossibilitys

  2. The singularity had nothing to do with matter. The singularity was the energy of consciousness becomings aware. We are alive within a dispersed field of consciousness and matter is only an illusion.

  3. Had this idea when learned that we (the humans) in fact emit the visible light, albeit non detectable with our eyes, where the sensitive enough a camera to detect it would be placed in a total darkness and the image projected on a monitor, ta-da, the observer and the observed are one, literally.

  4. Do this experiment with marble while not observing it.

    Electron have properties like charge ,force of attraction etc which marble do not have and observation device may effect those properties

  5. I've always been interested in theoretical physics, and thinking about this experiment again seems to correlate with Bell's theorem and non local variables. And so that "conscious" observation is perhaps a false-self perception of energy absorption, that does not somehow alter via projection, and which reminds us that there will always be a human unknowable; IMO that which is a universal mind-soul or "god." Which is a good thing!

  6. Agree with mossy1. Your "thoughts" have nothing to do with the observer effect, i.e. the sheer act of observing leads to physical interference with what is being studied. There is no "mind of matter" nonsense going on here.

  7. Listen to my theory and tell me if I am wrong….
    what I think is that,
    when wave interacts with quantum, then wave becomes matter.
    So, now lets talk about the observer effect.

    When we don't observe the electron, it acts like a wave, but when we observe, the photon emitted from the observer(just to explain) makes the wave act like particle …….

  8. People are saying that the act of measuring a sub atomic particle will affect its behavior, which I agree with. But how can a measurement make a photon act like a particle instead of a wave ? Its like saying if I measure water it will become a solid.

  9. I'm sure the real scientist doing this experiment accounted for the interference of the measuring devices…. stop acting like all of you are quantum mechanic geniuses lol

  10. let me just give and UPDATED response to this topic and let everyone know that the tools are NOT the ones interfering with the experiment and that this idea that was proposed is extremely outdated. Each photon contains an energy of E = h*f and we know how many photons are interacting with the system in a well controlled experiment. The energy associated therein is usually a very small fraction of the energy that would be needed to confine the particle to a classical behavior. There are, in fact, several ways that mathematics can prove this hypothesis. Experimenters are aware of this small correction due to the apparatus and always factor it into their experiments. sadly, the people on this page arent really up to date with their findings.

  11. Its impossible. Everything? Yep, everything. How are we going to explain this? I know lets use math. How convenient. You're in so much trouble, you have no idea.

  12. Does it mean that because I'm not observing the sun right now, then it doesn't exist? Can someone explain what the last 10 seconds of the video means?

  13. Video's wrong all to all

    It goes EXPERIMENT and not EXPERIMENT
    MEASUREMENT/RESULT MEASUREMENT
    AWARENESS AWARENESS/RESULT
    Awareness is irrelevant because what changes the result is the measurement. Humans conciouness is not part of the equation. o quantum physicist think so.

    Think of it like a soccer score.
    It goes KICK
    GOAL
    CROWD'S CELEBRATION
    What the video is saying is that the celebration interferes with the result of the kick because with no goal there would be no celebration. It's dumb.

  14. No. This is incorrect. The particles act like normal marbles when NOT seen. When look upon by a REAL LIFE observer they act like waves. Very disappointed in you for not doing your research well.

  15. are you really scientist? or just crazy youtuber wanted to ask for please like your video. of course if you throw a marvel vs an electron a marvel will create a pattern because a marvel composed of billions of molecules of electron influencing inside one marvel while electron is is minute one single electron all the space surrounding it like air and space will influence it thats why it created wave pattern.

  16. TIME ARROW CAN BE REVERSED IN THE EARLY BIG BANG CREATION PHASE TWEAK ONLY; BUT ONLY GOD CAN DO THE SETTING ADJUSTMENTS!! LOOK MORTALS, NO DASHBOARD CONTROLS!!!!! GOD REQUIRES NO INTERFACE.
    THE LEE SALEN-GA DISCOVERY ;IS THE VIOLATION OF THE 2ND LAW OF THERMODYNAMICS; THE "SALEN-GA BRAKE EFFECT" IS THE QUANTUM ANTI-ILLOGICAL THERMAL TRANSFER OF HEAT
    THROUGH A HEATPROOF VACUUM IN AN AMBIENT TEMPERATURE OF MINUS 273
    KELVIN!!!!!!! IT KEEPS EARTH' S OCEAN FROM BECOMING AN ICE SKATING FIELD.
    LEE SALEN-GA IS THE PILIPINO AMATEUR SCIENTIST WHO CREATED THE SALEN-GA QUANTUM TANGENT THEOREM; THE POINCARE LOOP, GEOMETRY OF A MARKER DOT EUCLIDIAN FLAT ON A GLOBALLY ROUND BILLIARD BALL. THE SCIENCE COMMUNITY
    HAD TO SILENTLY ADJUST THE DEFINITIONS OF QUANTUM GEOMETRY DUE TO THEIR FAILURE TO SEE THE OBVIOUS: THAT THE GLOBALLY ROUND EARTH IS QUANTUM ANTI-LOGICALLY LOCALLY FLAT!!!!!!!!

  17. It's not the act of conciously observing that causes this. It's the interaction on a quantum scale of the devices or rather the particles used to detect the electron that cause it to change. Light included.

    It's the physical changes we inadvertently make while attempting to measure something. If you put a thermometer in some sort of matter, water works well, you change the temperature of the water just by making contact between the thermometer and the water. If you have a thimble full of hot water in a room cooler than the water and quickly use several thermometers, each one cooler than the water being tested, you will notice the water will get cooler with each attempt to measure it's temperature. And it will do it faster than if you had placed a single thermometer in the water and left it there for the water to be measured over the same amount of time.

    There are countless ways an observer can inadvertently make changes to what they are observing based on what devices they are using to observe. Minimizing this effect will produce purer outcomes. And lastly there are ways to invoke the observer effect without physical interactions when it comes to psychological experiments amd even animal behavior. Those are cases that would resemble what's being told in this video. The subject being aware of the observation will most certainly skew the results. But an electron cannot be aware of the observer.

  18. This is a great video, and I remember watching it a couple years back.

    That being said, your title is very problematic. To say that the "consciousness somehow affected the motion of the electrons just doesn't make much sense. For one, the researcher performing the experiment would be expressing consciousness whether the electrons were acting as expected or acting as they do when observed on a quantum level. It's the photons used to observe the electrons' movements that change the way they act. It's just physics. Consciousness is a metaphysical concept. Metaphysics is inherently abstract from physical interactions.

    I suppose all of this might ring differently if you happen to believe that consciousness exists corporeally, rather than as a concept. But even so, the point remains that the presence of a thinking mind doesn't act as the deciding factor in how the experiment proceeds.

  19. Perhaps this suggests that our thoughts directly affect matter. Is it too far a stretch to suggest that conscious thought is a fundamental force of nature?

  20. until weve figured how our conscience and self-awareness can exist in the first place Id rather not worry why our conscience filters reality the way it does. egg before the chicken

  21. it's amazing, we create our reality. this is way beyond our five senses. I'm not a religious person, but I think JESUS knew this. that's why he said if we have faith the size of a mustard seed, we can create miracles. wow

  22. perhaps if people did experiment themselves they would not guess. they would know. we are never satisfied. the old was made by us for us. universe is perfect and the world is perfect for harboring life. we will look amd find so.ething we wished we never found. i.e. atomic bomb. imagine what devastating power will be unlocked In the future. Mars might have been earth once.

  23. Ok I get that the "Observer" device or the human eye changes the Super Position from multiple possibilities to 1 single possibility, but can anyone explain to me how this contention can be of any functional use.

Comments are closed.

WP2Social Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com