Xstream Technique
Clip from Cosmos Possible Worlds on National Geographic
https://www.nationalgeographic.com/tv/shows/cosmos-possible-worlds
Source
Thomas Young’s double slit experiment 2.0
The Engineering of Conscious Experience
AI, Art & Consciousness
Its the photon from observer that disturb the results of double slit
Is this made for small children or why choose this distracting scifi space flight story frame? I would have much preferred more actual info on the experiment setup, comparison with how light was previously observed to behave in earlier experiments and explanation of what "observation" means (I mean somehow it must have been observed or else how would "we" know and so does it matter if we or a machine observes it, in the moment or later)? This was a light show and little more
Is it because of Quantum decoherence?, the observer being the interference?
This video is a bit misleading in the wordings..
Just tinker with the observation, how far, mirrors, blind man etc and you will have an answer.
on a boat, at night, watching a light house lite, approching.when not blinking it is steady, turn left or right it starts to blink. to the unseasoned it IS concerning
lmao and years later Neil himself debunked this. Saying the reason it changes it state is because of light. Can't take a measurement without light, and the light of course effects the particle.
When i wont look at the loading screen, it loads fast but if i look at it, it wont move an inch..
What if it's a blind person
We are incorrectly assuming that observation is a passive behaviour. Observation is a physical interaction with the photons.
So Hubble is observing lights from various distant galaxies. Will it alter the photon of a distant galaxy from wave to particle? Means what we see is not what we expect to see?
My opinion, the world does not render where we don’t look, to save on memory. Long live simulation
Most people learn the standard double-slit experiment with a simple takeaway: "Measuring the photon disturbs it, causing the wave function to collapse and making it act like a particle." It sounds like a mechanical disruption—like poking a wave with a stick.
However, the Quantum Eraser Experiment completely turns this intuition upside down.
Scientists set up an experiment where they did track which slit the photon went through (using entangled photon pairs), but later designed a system that permanently erased that path information. The mind-blowing result? When the path information was erased, the photons went right back to behaving like waves and formed an interference pattern on the screen.
skip. hand-waving, narcissistic wannabe Sagan. and, yah, some minds can hold both wave and particle ideas at once. p.s. do you understand wave collapse and the observer effect? probably not. astrophyicists are sorta the new astrologers, and can't explain what the expanding universe expands into.
'
Contradicts??
https://youtu.be/yGwwP-jmcjg?is=csvMtfTt-5kL-65P
I dont understand what do they mean by observe? Isn't it like the device used for observing it is causing it to behave differently resulting in different outcome?
When we observe the experiment, we take photons from the environment and convert them into electrons in our eyes through a biochemical reaction. The question here is, what is a photon and how does it behave?
Can someone explain how do you watch a photon at the first place? When you said watch it vs do not watch it, what does it mean?
The act of observation is an act of interference, by sending a detecting wave, we're basically manipulating the photon to 1 specific result.
It changes pattern when not observed because there's no frequency to manipulate the outcome. There's no longer any manipulation of the field that effects the results.
Observation is an interference in itself. E-Z
There’s no evidence that consciousness plays any role in the double-slit experiment. A measurement requires a physical interaction. When a detector interacts with a particle passing through the slits, the particle becomes entangled with the detector, and the interference pattern disappears. This is a real physical effect, not a result of the particle somehow knowing it is being watched. If no physical process measures the path, the particle can remain in a superposition and an interference pattern is observed
Greetings Time Travellors … In my over 50 years of electronics and physics studies I now believe the photon is a carrier ot the information from its source … just how it knows not to take the same path as its future photon is the real mystery !
I don’t understand having a multiple lines with bright and dark gaps is a wave and since it’s passing through two slit where does multiple lines come from?
Cosmos possible worlds ep 9
So people confuse "observe" as seeing it with an eye from the side(consciousness). But observe means to measure and alter the state . for example putting a spoon in the food u made is "observing" because now you have already altered the size of the food. not by looking at it from a distance and saying "I observed it with my consciousness."
The blame originally belongs to the founding fathers of quantum mechanics in the 1920s. When they wrote their papers, they used the English word "Observe" , they meant a macroscopic physical apparatus.
Instead,of explainijg what observe means in quantum dynamics . it is much more "bingable" to say: "The particle knows it is being watched. It changes its behavior just because you looked at it."
Yes, what Neil deGrasse Tyson is claiming with his materialist perspective, that it is the measurement apparatus (the instrument used to observe the experiment) that causes the particles to collapse by introducing light, it is false and debunked belief.
All of this has been demonstrated in the experiment by Radin, D., Michael, L., Galdenze, K., Wendland, P., Rikenbach, R., Delorme, A. (2012), Consciousness and the double-slit interference pattern: six experiments, Physics Essays, 25, 157–171.
With evidence that it is not the hardwer to interfeer but the conscious observer
Where is the rest of the video
things immediately lose their credibility when its done in AI
Whats the full show called?
Lo loose lwdekbl adhnne kelaake bandhe, nee thirga nanne kelu… Mostly light ge nachike aagthirbeku
How is this possible is the observer is an interference
WELL GOD CREATION IT IS BROO
I know the answer
The photon interacts with the measuring device…
..but who's looking when we're not? ..does "he" expect the waves? …wanna talk to him…
every 2-3 years I like to think about this experiment and get pissed off.
Incredible
It's like a horror story 😮
Where can I find the full video of this?
900th comment
This is the peak cinematic plot I have ever witnessed..
yall clearly never boiled milk
conveniently left out that we don't just watch like we watch cars, we destroy information while watching else the pattern would be there
What if we make double observation? Then we can find an answer right?
Maybe because when we look at the photons their path is interfered because of the light reflecting from our vision to the photons like they get pushed over by light itself .
I absolutely love how this was explained
Imagine someone finds the answer and post it here
If we don't observe how we know it shows multiple patterns
Thats why my parents said dont look around when u perform double slit experiment in school 😅
I guess it's cheaper to not have to compute each photon seperatly
Bullshit..you want to watch which slit it travels,you need light(illumination).and if you switch on that room light,the photons in the light interact with and it becomes particles.(Wave formation collapses)