Consciousness Videos

Time does not exist: Carlo Rovelli at TEDxLakeComo



TEDx Talks

Theoretical physicist known for his work on quantum gravity. He has worked at the Università la Sapienza of Rome, Imperial College London, the University of Pittsburgh and Yale University in the United States. He is a Full Professor at the Aix-Marseille Université in the Centre de Physique, Senior Member of the Institut Universitaire de France, the International Academy of Philosophy of Science, and Honorary Professor at Beijing Normal University. He has dedicated particular attention to the philosophy and history of ancient science and has recently completed a book on the Greek philosopher Anaximander “What is Science?” Mondadori 2011. He collaborates with the Sole 24 Ore and La Repubblica. (www.cpt.univ-mrs.fr/ )
In the spirit of ideas worth spreading, TEDx is a program of local, self-organized events that bring people together to share a TED-like experience. At a TEDx event, TEDTalks video and live speakers combine to spark deep discussion and connection in a small group. These local, self-organized events are branded TEDx, where x = independently organized TED event. The TED Conference provides general guidance for the TEDx program, but individual TEDx events are self-organized.* (*Subject to certain rules and regulations)

Source

Similar Posts

40 thoughts on “Time does not exist: Carlo Rovelli at TEDxLakeComo
  1. Comunque prof se sono nello spazio e lei è davanti a me a buo ritto, mi dice:prendi la pallina in alto!! istintivamente presuppongo che il suo alto,anche se a buo ritto rispetto a me,intenda il mio, cioè quello che guarderei io naturalmente cioè alzo gli occhi alla….fronte oppure se la pallina fosse alla mia destra mi volterei dx e se la pallina fosse in basso nello spazio guarderei verso il mio di buo nero,viceversa anche se lei è capovolto a buo ritto rispetto a me, la pallina che vedo davanti a me per fargliela prendere, le direi prenda la pallina sotto di lei quindi lei dove guarderebbe???

  2. "Reality is not what it seems" – belissimo libro, congratulazioni. L'unico libro che avevo letto da … 10 anni? Lo sto raccomandando ai miei amici. Nella scienza non c'e spazio per le favoli titolati "religioni"…

  3. Quello che mi piace è che c'è gente che commenta e mette in discussione quello che dice un fisico, anzi più fisici, perché mostra l'equazione senza il tempo dei due fisici americani del '63…peraltro Rovelli è bravissimoa spiegare cosa significhi "il tempo non esiste" se lo capisco io chehoconoscenze soloscolastiche della materia. Basta vedere il video fino in fondo…

  4. Perché onorevole professore parla per quello che non esiste?!!!
    Why does the honorable professor speak for what does not exist? !!!
    Warum spricht der verehrte Professor für das, was es nicht gibt? !!!

  5. I have a problem in the phrase "looking back in time". My very simplistic view is that a "moment" at my location is the exact same "moment" at any point in the universe or beyond the universe. The fact that the very distant "moment" can take numerous light years to tell us that it (a particle, a group of particles a star) has just had its moment for me to observe that moment on earth I will need to live all most forever to witness the arrival of that moment at my location . The conclusion that I draw is that each and every particle has a "moment" in which every other particle has a mathematical fix in space. If you will, a "Universal General Positioning". What the human race is observing is "Change" in the absolute coordinates of all partilces in what ever form. Being that is the case, the need to have a "dimension of time" becomes redundant. After all, the measurement of time is one that we humans have invented and is a concept to allow us to organise when and where our bodies our things, our World can be coordinated. Given that, once Einstein got to Special Relativity he got stuck on General Relativity and then he really got hung up that Gravity is observed but cannot be explained. Einstein had a buddy, a mathematician, who he turned to with his problem. His problem was given that a particle with mass is travelling in a straight line through space how can a second particle travelling through space on a different trajectory be mathematically cleared to meet with each other. Thats when Herman Minkowski offered a solution which was to cause a depression, a vortix, in which a particle can be taken through a change of direction by following a straight line which has been curved. It is referred to as Minkowski Space Time. This clever solution has never been proven and has led science, in my humble opinion up a blind alley trying to bring together Special and General Relativity together as one.

    The concept of travelling back through time is therefore binned as to travel, "to return", to a original form would infer all the particles of the universe would have to conform in a mathematical relationship to each other coincidental to the form that is anticipated by travelling back in "time". Similarly, the concept of travelling forward through time would infer an arrival in the future would need all the total elements of the Universe to be in lock-step in accordance with the mathematical lock on their postions at that "time" chosen. If time is binned it will make the understanding of our universe that much easier as I feel confident the solution will turn out to be a very precise but simple one

  6. NOTICE: Subtitles EXIST!!! Do NOT miss this video!
    "

    Click on "CC" to enable captions.
    —> Click on "Settings" –> Select "Subtitles/CC" –> Select "Auto Translate" –> Choose the language that you prefer.
    I chose English and it works very very perfectly!
    "
    steps copied from one of the comments(NEWKNOWLEDGE
    ).

  7. Riflettendo sul tempo che non esiste, per la prima volta riesco ad immaginare e trovare quasi "logico" anche il mondo quantistico, comprese quelle che erroneamente consideriamo probabilità, ma in realtà è il concetto di tempo (che usiamo in modo sbagliato secondo la nostra percezione abituale) che ce le fa sembrare tali. Inoltre, sempre a livello puramente di immaginazione, finalmente riesco a vedere la fisica quantistica non in contraddizione con la relatività generale, senza che si generino strani paradossi a volerle mettere insieme. Secondo me è davvero una intuizione geniale, quella che il tempo non esiste. Chiaramente il lavoro duro sarà quello di riscrivere tutta la fisica senza il tempo e dimostrare che funziona meglio delle leggi che adoperiamo oggi.

  8. Unfortunately, "if I have two things expressed as a function of time then I can also express one as purely a function of the other" does not make a very convincing argument that time is in fact non-existent. It may well be for all we know, but it does not follow from the point he seems to be making.

  9. Consiglio di leggere il racconto Storie della tua vita da cui è stato tratto il film Arrival. grazie a questo tedtalk ora apprezzo di piu racconto e film eheh. Ma quindi alla fine mi chiedo se siamo riusciti s capire come funziona il magnetismo o no. Devo fare qualche ricerca alle superiori non si sapeva ancora. Saluti

  10. the professor Rovelli is perfectly right. Time doesn't exist. The ancient great Indian doctrine told the same and also the philosopher Kant. We can't accept this concept because we are feared of death but it doesn't change the fact that time doesn't exist.

Comments are closed.

WP2Social Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com