William Lane Craig gets destroyed by Dawkins and Dennett – Is God the Cause of the Universe?

28 thoughts on “William Lane Craig gets destroyed by Dawkins and Dennett – Is God the Cause of the Universe?”

1. Dislike. Don’t mention people who aren’t even in the fucking video.

2. click bait no dawkins

3. WLC beats himself, using his detractor's arguments.

4. The religious are just so embarrassing to watch anymore.

5. You are very desperate to state the title in this way. Your good at what you do, but I would never trust a Greasy seller of magic beans, magic dust, and a magic man in the sky.

6. Liar!

7. Block this channel

8. You are garbage for clickbaiting

9. Accepting Craig's argument and conclusion (and I don't), we're still left with a great many questions. Chief among them is: What did this "personal" god do before there were persons? The popular Christian belief, as it pertains to the creation of man is that God was lonely and created man as a companion. Given that this god was and is eternal, that's a long time without companionship. Try to imagine an eternity of existence without any apparent reason to exist, because without another agent to acknowledge your existence, it's as though you don't exist at all. In fact, I don't think you do.

10. WTF man. I spent 8 minutes waiting for Dennet and Dawkins rebuttal. Update your title to " Craig making fun of Dawkins and Dennet"

11. wtf ..listening to this non sequitur master …

12. Stupidity has a cause……. religion !

13. Downvoted and reported as misleading shite.

14. gibberish

15. Religion bunkum.

16. so is this supposed to convert me? lure me here under false pretense and then what… i trust the content??? sad effort and more reason to not believe in the lies and propaganda! how about being honest in your title and then actual people seeking the content of this video would be reached… sad!

17. Lane Craig isn't a charleton, he's as mad as a bat. He genuinely believes the sophistry he spouts. He's very arrogant as well, he must have a gigantic ego if he thinks he can ascribe properties to whatever it is the Universe emerged from. He's way out of his depth there.

18. Was I supposed to be blind sided into accepting your daft superstition by this string of logical fallacies?
    For the last time: the fact that science cannot yet explain everything with absolute certainty does nothing to prove the existence of a god. Particularly as nobody can provide the merest suggestion of a shred of evidence to support their deity's existing to begin with.
    This fool's whole rant can be condensed down to: "Science can't tell me exactly how the universe began, therefore it stands to reason that my imaginary friend must have done it. Check mate, science!"
    You need to be a very special kind of simple to accept that utter bollocks.

19. He looks exactly like David Lee Roth.

20. Well, if you see the full debates seems the opposite. It´s easy to chop fragments of the videos.

21. Fuck this twat and other deluded cunts

22. You’re an idiot for posting this without adding Dawkins or Dennet. I bet all the “likes” came from theists. Ugh

23. incredible face punchability

24. Click bait

25. If the universe has a cause it's a NATURAL CAUSE.. prove there is a metaphysical being first then use it as an explanation. Idiot.

26. I believe the two most dangerous human qualities are ignorance mixed with arrogance.

27. The caused uncaused causes me to think be-cause I can see through bullshit, and this us pure bullshit, amen

28. You people are full of dishonesty and nonsense and foolishness! Thanks for wasting my time.

Comments are closed.