Videos

3-hour Discussion on Metaphysics (Sheldrake, Dennett, Dyson, Toulmin, Sacks, Gould, Kayzer)



What do you desire?

A Glorious Accident (1993)

http://www.nytimes.com/1994/06/12/arts/television-six-smart-guys-sitting-around-talking.html?pagewanted=all

~ Many more lectures on the Alan Watts Philosophy and Metaphysics playlist: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLDrE8eovyz8DQHrs2BXdVIYgRdRMVsjOb

– Join us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/whatdoyoudesireyoutube

Source

Similar Posts

23 thoughts on “3-hour Discussion on Metaphysics (Sheldrake, Dennett, Dyson, Toulmin, Sacks, Gould, Kayzer)
  1. People of apocalyptic ideas clung themselves to the identity of the helpless victim and so all the evidence they lookesd for was suportive of that identity.

  2. It is refreshing and interesting to hear a debate among intellectuals that is not dumbed down for the general public. It is a nerdy discussion, the people are comfortable in their environment. In today's world, intellectual midgets can debate on par with intellectuals, shouting evens the odds, and most debates end in an angry draw.

  3. I think a similar conversation today, with similarly ranked intellectuals, would turn out to be much more combative. I think the reason for this would be the increasing interconnectedness of the human race, and it’s increasing lack of sustenance. Doomsday clock ticking… though it would still be a nice conversation to watch on YouTube =). Maybe if Hitler won the war, we’d be more relaxed nowadays. Oh well, in the perfection of reality, he didn’t.

  4. I like Rupert they so easily dismiss him all the time but his thoughts and questioning are relevant to the complexity of the subject matters, and have a deep philosophical undertone to them.

  5. Everybody that watches this needs to watch Paul Thomas Anderson’s movie The Master. Especially those following the cult of metaphysics.

Comments are closed.

WP2Social Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com