Similar Posts

44 thoughts on “Amit Goswami, Quantum Physics & Consciousness 3 of 3
  1. ….the ego has to prepare and then when that leap occurs in the quantum self and we have the great insight, the ego has to manifest that insight

  2. The real simple plain truth is that in order to understand the nature of the soul (or whatever other language game you want to use to describe the same) you have to control the senses and the mind and you have to accept a process of Yoga. These kinds of Yoga are not some "religion". They are systematic processes for achieving self realisation. There is a very nice book called "Science of Self Realisation". Just read that book. The perfection of all different kinds of Yoga is Pure Love which is realised as the intrinsic function of this "movement of the individual with the movement of the whole" as Amit describes. This Pure Love of Godhead is the only thing which transcends the duality of the mind/senses. All other paths are limbs of the one central eternal path, which is Pure Love. In Sanskrit: Prema Bhakti.

  3. I think the interviewer here did not understand the concept when she asked "how do we end up creating each other" . Quantum physics says everything is a possibility and an observer is necessary to create the illusion of tangibility of an object or an atom from outside,..and the consciousness which is the omnipresent, is the observer which leads to the collapse and its not simply I or you..but ego gives us a fake identity of the observer..which make us feel I am the observer

  4. so true…we all want to be top dog & we all want to be admired/loved in some shape or form…this is ego..we need to be free of that to function as we were supposed to…we all come from the same source & we are killing each other by fighting it…we are too busy projecting, transferring, defending, controlling…the world will never be a good place unless we stop this…and we won't. Everything is about connections, strangers smile at each other in the street & it feels good inside=love.

  5. My dad was a quantum physics well as his friends and there fathers. If you listen to him. There IS a reality, what we see. There exists a our dreams when we sleep or meditate. This man is a genius

  6. Well spoken articulate man! He exudes confidence while he speaks implying his certainty about the relationship we have as individuals and as part of the whole with the universe and within the universe.I would love to speak with this man for quite some time and learn his style of objective observation which I think may be the catalyst for the realization of our own relationship with & within the universe.He has recognizable eastern philosophy injected into his style which gives it a Mystic touch

  7. I would love to speak with this man. Everything he says coincides perfectly with the answers I have arrived at explaining experiences I have had while deep in hallucinogenic meditation. Every person can become aware of what he is talking about.

  8. @FeelOfFriction Some peeps need a psychedlic to visit spirit world and see its real.
    Some do not.. Some find out the hard way, some do not.
    =)
    I wouldnt suggest them, if you wish spirit guidance it would not require such things but it is a way to see that spirit is out there..
    There are other ways also, thats all.. =)

  9. If right angles have such actions in space, then so shouldn't they in time hence, when we are at right angles on a timeline relative to death, we should expierence signs of our death.

  10. ok I repeat, who the hell are seth/jane roberts????
    why didn't you answer that question the last time I asked it??
    Why did you bring them up in the first place??
    Why are you choosing me to tell their silly opinions to??
    What example are you going on about??
    I made a judgement on their alleged 'viewpoint', and no more. It is illogical based on known science, and known usage of words, and what I've said 4 months back, above.
    Please answer those questions if you wish to respond to me at all.

  11. Um, who are Seth /Jane Roberts?
    Anyway, their viewpoint has no evidence to support it, and doesn't make sense.
    'a posteriori' and 'a priori', in other words.

  12. I think subatomic particles and energy ( not enough known abt E) are affected by human consciouness which is not totally controlled by the ego.

    I hear more ego in the comments of viewers than true self( soul).

    LHC experiments are merely extension of our desire of materialistic exploration. I wish more scientists approach science with enelightened mind as Dr AG doing.

  13. What you have described is perception. This is the exchange of info. in matter.
    Consciousness, or awareness, is just a complex form of perception that life forms have, because a life form is focussing all its perceptions to a personal agenda, i.e multiply, etc., thereby a sense of SELF. Where the line is drawn as to where perceptions are sufficiently complex is arbitrary.
    Sentience is a consiousness with a sufficiently developed sense of imagination. Humanity is most developed in this sense.

  14. I think consciousness is exactly the same kind of illusion that color is–a completely artificial thing invented by a mind to represent itself, like color stands for the differences in signals generated from cone cells in the fovea, consciousness helps us keep the distinction between what we label as in us and part of us from what we label as not part of us, but outside and separate.

  15. I have questions about what Amit says, so I sympathize. Namely does he know the difference between consciousness and perception. Matter percieves, complex perception is consciousness, what complex life forms have.
    Perception is just reciept of information and that info having an effect, and also vice versa..

  16. I guess I just didn't take the graphics in the Matrix movies that seriously. I do realize we can't see the reality we live in, but only the one created in our minds to model it. I try to understand what I can about it, but I think that means trying to not let what I want it to be influence what I can objectively deduce or discover about it. You seem to take the opposite approach–reckoning that you're perfectly designed to know anything potentially, you just need to allow it to happen. But why?

  17. "Actually, we are seeing a race to be the first to explain the mechanisms of consciousness that must be employed to make the potential actual." What does that sentence mean? There is a race to create software that convinces us it is conscious? Why say it in such an awkward way? Yes there is. Same thing with the next sentence, what are you trying to say? We have lots of information about the brain but few paradigms that tie it all together? Yes, that's true. Like it was before QED in physics.

Comments are closed.

WP2Social Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com