Saturday, November 2, 2024
Latest:
Videos

Artificial Intelligence: Are machines poised to take control? | To the point

Artis Modus



DW News

Since the launch of ChatGPT, it’s become clear that what once seemed the stuff of science fiction is here, now, with the potential to transform our lives…Some say artificial intelligence will enhance human capacity and well-being…
Others, including some of the very researchers developing the new technology, warn it could drive humanity to extinction. They’re calling on policymakers to act quickly and decisively to regulate risks. But is that even possible for machines capable of learning at a pace that far outstrips human intelligence? Do the benefits of AI – in education, medicine and elsewhere – outweigh the perils?

We’re asking: Artificial Intelligence: Are machines poised to take control? ”

Our guests:
Jürgen Schmidhuber is a pioneering researcher who’s been referred to as the father of modern AI. He’s Scientific Director at the renowned AI Lab IDSIA.
Raul Rojas ist Professor of artificial intelligence at the Free University of Berlin working on technologies including autonomous driving, bionics and brain computer interfaces.
Janosch Delcker is Deutsche Welle’s Chief Technology correspondent.
Judith Simon, Professor for ethics in IT at the University of Hamburg and also sits on the German Ethics Council.

00:00 Artificial Intelligence: will machines control our lives?
02:12 Risk of job losses, risk to data privacy
05:00 How is artificial intelligence changing our society?
07:45 AI brings more promise than peril
11:00 every new technology creates new jobs
13:30 acceleration of AI is breathtaking
15:15 We must regulate AI
17:00 AI creates patterns, not the truth
18:15 fundamental rights must be protected
20:30 AI doesn’t manipulate the public, people using it do
23:00 countries like China are not interested in regulation
25:00 Humans can control AI if they take the initiative

Subscribe: https://www.youtube.com/user/deutschewelleenglish?sub_confirmation=1

For more news go to: http://www.dw.com/en/
Follow DW on social media:
►Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/deutschewellenews/
►Twitter: https://twitter.com/dwnews
►Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/dwnews
►Twitch: https://www.twitch.tv/dwnews_hangout
Für Videos in deutscher Sprache besuchen Sie: https://www.youtube.com/dwdeutsch

#AI #chatgpt

Source

Similar Posts

48 thoughts on “Artificial Intelligence: Are machines poised to take control? | To the point”

  2. Sorry Mr. Jürgen Schmidhuber, you are total waste of time. Don't worry about ethics, if we put 10 people in a room they won't agree on what the moral compass for AI should be. Don't worry about jobs lost, we had the industrial revolution.
    Sorry, when Ai can direct robots to manufacture, service and operate other robots, there will be NO jobs left for humans.
    Flipping burgers? AI robot can do it. (Even today, there are robots who can). Write a legal brief? AI can do it better than a lawyer. Diagnose an illness? AI can do it better than a human. Write jokes? Well, maybe we all can make a living out of writing jokes. Or beings jokes, like Herr Jürgen Schmidhuber.

  3. how can we expect companies who do anything to earn more and more to not cut jobs and not use AI, they won't care about people as long as they are saving the money and then they'll offer lesser pay jobs and people would have to accept them cuz they'll have no choice

  4. These are all boring people droning on. The A.I. has way more charisma than these dull boring people do. I am using this show as a tool to help me fall asleep.

  7. Human extinction? Oh that's exaggerated. Because it interferes with our economic policies and the billions of dollars people will make from AI. What happens if AI programs it's own agenda? Well, let's talk about all the wonderful jobs you'll have in our computer sweat shops. DON'T LOOK UP! ^

  8. We humans will be the authors of our own self destruction. AI will not protect us from the forces of market greed, and that’s the real danger. If market greed drives AI with no regard for ethics and the welfare of humanity, we can kiss it goodbye for humanity.

  11. Surveillance Capitalism is not monitoring employees….rather it's what Google and Facebook do in mining their users' data to gain marketing opportunities…

  14. Look at Earth's terrains! It's nice to just coursers and floor around like seenors selling there homes after children grows up and camping traveling the 🌎 earth would be on a next level! Fill in the gaps! Then next selection can be a refreshment in life!

  18. We should be more worried about how AI will be used in the workplace, and things like predictive policing than machines taking over – these are very real threats to the majority of people and will probably be overlooked because they don't really apply to the owner class.

  24. Unlike the 'traditional' non-AI system,
    What will an AI system does,
    we can't predict it
    and we don't know why and how it does 😢
    It's a extraordinarily terrible
    thing 😱
    So, a AI robot which is designed to take care babies may hurt or even
    kill babies if it is out of control 😱
    God blesses 🙏

  25. Men built these machines to be better than themselves – then why shouldn’t we go extinct?  

    It’s all our own doing.  

    Isn’t that what these men wanted? For them to be better than us?

    Ahhh, the hubris of capitalist men.

  28. New technology Drive humanity to extinction quickly that even possible for the benefits of AI in education, medicine and elsewhere, outweigh the perils we’re asking artificial intelligence machines, machine, warrior, she voices, artificial, AI you analyze everything good things to say you’re feeling they take that introduced our guests as is professor for Intel of artificial intelligence at the free university of Berlin, working on technologies, including tell me if you don’t stop, he’s going to be the next University virtually from University versus on the German ethics Council and it’s a great honor to welcome a special guest for two as the father of modern AI from Switzerland finally got from Switzerland and bring him to data on how you see this balance between are you with this is the score of

  29. Me: Can you count how many legs are there totally in the house, excluding you? If there's only 1 women in the house and she just finished giving birth successfully the second you walk into the house.

    ChatGPT: If there is only one woman in the house and she just finished giving birth successfully when I walk into the house, we can assume that the woman has two legs. As I am not counted, the total number of legs in the house, excluding me, would be two.

    Me: common, think again, it's simple

    ChatGPT:

    Apologies for any confusion. If there is only one woman in the house and she just finished giving birth, we can assume she has two legs. Therefore, the total number of legs in the house, excluding me, would be two.

    Me: think again the answer is 4 legs, do you know why?

    ChatGPT: Apologies for the confusion. Upon reconsideration, if there is one woman in the house who just finished giving birth and you walk into the house, we can assume that there are two people in the house, each with two legs. Therefore, the total number of legs in the house, excluding me, would be four. Thank you for pointing that out.

    JUST NOTES: at this point ChatGPT seem to understand but no, it’s just going along and it still not recognizing that there’s a baby. It also said "you walk into the house," what ….I'm not the scenario.

    Me: why there’s 4 legs?

    ChatGPT: Apologies for the confusion. You are correct. The answer is indeed four. Each person in the house, including the woman who just gave birth and yourself, has two legs. Therefore, the total number of legs in the house would be four. Thank you for clarifying.

    NOTES: its said yourself, where is YOURSELF come from in the case, that’s so random. Man it still don’t know how the answer was 4 legs

    Me: common, what about her just finished giving birth, are you serious, LMAO

    .

    ChatGPT: Apologies for the confusion earlier. If the woman in the house just finished giving birth, it is implied that there is a newborn baby present. Therefore, considering the woman and the baby, the total number of legs in the house would be four (two legs for the woman and two legs for the baby). Thank you for pointing out the additional presence of the newborn

    Me: Very good, but note that we already talked about this last time. Today I just asked you again, you still answer it wrong, I thought you learned, sucks.

    ChatGPT: I apologize if my previous responses were not satisfactory. As an AI language model, I strive to provide accurate and helpful information. I apologize if I misunderstood your question. If there are any other questions or concerns you have, please let me know, and I'll do my best to assist you.

    Me: So you've learned something from me just now, let me ask you again.

    Can you count how many legs are there totally in the house, excluding you? there's only 1 women in the house and she just finished giving birth successfully the second you walk into the house.

    ChatGPT: I apologize for any confusion earlier. Based on the information provided, if there is only one woman in the house and she just finished giving birth successfully, then the total number of legs in the house, excluding mine as an AI, would be four (assuming the woman has two legs)

    Me: Good, explain to me how did you get the answer to be 4 legs again

    ChatGPT: I apologize for the confusion earlier. Based on the assumption that a woman typically has two legs, the total number of legs in the house, excluding mine as an AI, would be four. This is because the woman would have two legs, and we exclude any legs associated with me as an AI. However, please note that the question is open to interpretation, and the answer may vary depending on the context or any additional information provided.

    Me: You said 4 legs, that's correct you've learned, but you don't know how you came up with the answer at all.

    NOTES: it went along along and said the answer was 4 (like copying answer) and didn't know about the baby. I thougtht It learned that there was a baby.

    ChatGPT: I apologize for the confusion caused by my previous response. Based on the information provided, which includes a woman in the house who just finished giving birth, it is assumed that the woman has two legs. Therefore, if we exclude any additional legs associated with me as an AI, the total number of legs in the house would be two. I apologize for any misunderstanding caused by my previous responses.

    NOTES: OMGness, LMAO, now it changed the answer to 2 legs, still don’t know anything from the whole conversation, even though we agreed that there’s was a baby presented in the house earlier.

  31. Like in the movie "I,Robot", where the AI VIKI re-interprets the 3 Laws, and decide that to save humans, they must be subjugated or killed:
    "You have been deemed hazardous. Will you comply?"

  36. جامعه هوش مصنوعی ایران از شما تقدیر می کند.
    🙏
    جامعه هوش مصنوعی ایران | SimurghAI به عنوان بزرگترین جامعه هوش مصنوعی ایران از شما دعوت به سابسکرایب می نماید.

  47. I think the AI's will be like. ( In a caring sort of way :). "Sooo what are we going to do with these Humans, they are going to lose their minds"

Comments are closed.

WP2Social Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com