Bella Ross
A Short Introduction to the key concepts of Ferdinand de Saussure and Structural Linguistics .(tagsToTranslate)Ferdinand De Saussure(t)Structural Linguistics(t)the sign(t)signifier(t)signified(t)Saussure(t)diachrony(t)synchrony(t)parole(t)langue(t)syntagm(t)paradigm(t)syntagmatic axis(t)paradigmatic axis(t)arbitrary(t)conventional(t)Linguistics (Field Of Study)
Ferdinand de Saussure and Structural Linguistics
wow
Awesome! Great graph and table in the Paradigm and Syntagm contrast!
cant understand it! low voice
Really good explanation – could you cover this too? > Laura Mulvey. “Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema.” Would really appreciate it Bella 🙂
excellent. Very clear
The beautiful explanation you made it very clear thank you so much
Thanks
Can you also please do similar video on "Bloomfield" and "Naom Chomsky"? Thank you ☺
I was taught that Saussure never talked about "structure / structural" (4min47s), instead he used the word "system". His students later used the word structure to talk about his work. Can you confirm?
If you've ever learned another language, you sometimes come across words and phrases that do not have an exact translation in our own language. What does that mean for Sassure's notion that there is no signified without a signifier, especially in terms of translating terms for something more abstract?
Nice
amazing explanation. thank you
can u define it in Hindi language
and the point of all this is? …
thankssss I needed this
Very informative, thanks!
– a confused student from Humanities class
Merci! Cela m’a aidé! 🙂
excellent work it helped me a lot. keep it up
Thanks ma'am
Ferdinand de Saussure never forgot his two socks. Not funny? Translate into French and you'll get it. You, language 😉
great vid! thanks!
article similar to that one can be found here http://www.hispatrad.net/
and I ended up watching cat videos instead of studying, after watching this one. great..
Very bad narration
great explantion but way to fast
Very wisely crafted
I'm confused about "language is structural, thereby freeing it from associations, be they social, cultural, political, historical" and then you say "linguistic objects meaning is understood through its contrast with other objects". Can something be free of associations and at the same time contrast with others? What is meant by association here? I, for example, associate the word monarchy in opposition with republic; the word gentlemen and its contrast with peers and commoners. These things are at the same time associations and contrasts, that's why I'm confused.
Thank you so much, I think I'm finally starting to understand it.
1:53 speech community needs to…….
Thank you so much! This helped tremendously. It's strange that there is not much material on the difference. I owe you a coffee 🙂
This is going to take me a bit of time.
Why can't my professor just say this instead of over complicating our lectures????
i'm sorry but that's the cutest fkn cat i've ever seen
Hi Bella. Can you please tell me what application have you used to create this video?