The Economist
Lee Smolin, a theoretical physicist at Perimeter Institute in Ontario, explains why traditional ways of thinking about time are insufficient to explain how the universe works
Source
Lee Smolin on the future of physics: Outside the box
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1xtzuM96VWg-QwVpxpK2Bbq_VjjyW3nWhIuoh02Tsd8Q/edit?usp=sharing
Even if Lee Smolin is not a good speaker, his book"The Trouble with Physics" is fascinating.
lol..let this be a warning to young people out there..when you do to much masturbating your hand will start a life of its own..it is a simple matter of physics. Seriously though. Logic dictates that you are dealing with everything of which the natural world, the cosmos, is a part. We simply do not know if everything and the natural world is identical..we only pretend that we know.
The man has a hand of its own, it seems.
He's great through.
Please read The Physics of Spirits by Derryl Hermanutz. The End Notes in the book will blow your mind.
Nonsense. If you go his way, anyone can explain anything any way they want. Babble.
He's right! Physics is far too isolationist and needs to consider the universe as a whole. Also his point about initial conditions being left unexplained is very effective. Did they change in the past? Are the laws not constant but evolving? Mind-blowing.
starting to sound like sheldrake
his hand movement is distracting
Very interesting idea`s.
Sub: Cosmology needs best of brains trust
out of box think tanks promote inventive Spirit- Creative Index.
Searching minds find Guiding spirit.
1.OM JNANAM UDBHAVAM -KNOWLEDGE BASE CREATION
BY VIDYARDHI NANDURI MAY 2013 -new book under copyright application
KNOWLEDGE BASE CREATION-ADHATO BRAHMA JIJNASAH
SEARCHING MINDS -GUIDING SIRITUAL ENLIGHTENMENT
PART I :JNANA UDBHAVAM: PART II: JNANA UDBHAVAM DATTAM
[PART OF SPACE COSMOLOGY VEDAS INTELINKS-INDEPENDENT RESEARCH]
see Cosmos quest-youtube
because you're a reactionary.
Really, because he gives a strong impression that he is unimpressed with experimental evidence – at least any particle physics experimental evidence or any evidence for special relativity – and says that repeatability is a temporary phenomena. He thinks outside the box by constructing a bigger box apparently based on hand waving, then undermines the tools that could challenge it. May be a fascinating philosophy or an attractive religion (not to me) but isn't much to do with science.
Answer: eccentrics aren't usually concerned with experimental evidence, repeatability and falsifiability. Lee Smolin is.
why do I feel like I am listening not to a theoretical physicist talking about the future of physics, but to an eccentric with a grab bag of metaphysical philosophies?