Art

PHILOSOPHY – Soren Kierkegaard



Soren Kierkegaard is useful to us because of the intensity of his despair at the compromises and cruelties of daily life. He is a companion for our darkest moments. Find out more by reading our book “Life lessons from Kierkegaard” (we ship worldwide): http://www.theschooloflife.com/shop/life-lessons-from-kierkegaard/

Please subscribe here: http://tinyurl.com/o28mut7
Brought to you by http://www.theschooloflife.com

Produced in collaboration with Mad Adam Films
http://www.madadamfilms.co.uk #TheSchoolOfLife

The School of Life

Source

Similar Posts

32 thoughts on “PHILOSOPHY – Soren Kierkegaard
  1. Well I am really happy to be the part of that "little of you" who does the leap of Faith. Never regretted it in any way thanks to God.

  2. Exactly how I feel about the world and my view. Also his solution is also mine but I will rather use it as an emotional reason not an intellectual reason and no such 'leap of faith' I would rather say that it isn't an argument for God but more of food that we need desperitely. This philosopher is a great one and really shows us how deeply the world is a terrible and for him, laughable.
    He would be considered a christian existentialist. That life has no meaning and we should rely on Jesus and christianity. I am part of that. They are really touching to the heart of man and of society

  3. His last name ''Kierkegaard / Kirkegård'' means church yard ( Graveyard) Which is well fitting since he only wrote about death

  4. A marvelous :you can understand life backwards. but must live it forwards. In very simple way , try to imagine yourself presently in your car driving in a simple road ….you can not go forward safely without seeing from time to time backward to check the situation …..i think

  5. So you expect us… to listen to stuff a person who fell in love with an 18 year old child…, thought…. As if it was valuable philosophy? Why? How come? Who would be interested in a Mind like that?

  6. I am frustrated with this and other analyses that do not seem to understand that most of Kierkegaard's works were written from perspectives he didn't necessarily agree with. For example, most of Either/ Or Volume 1 was written from the perspective of a young hedonist, and most of volume 2 was written from the perspective of an elderly Christian judge – and what's more, both "authors" included inserted opinions from their friends and the whole work starts off as presented by the person who "found the manuscripts in a dueling pistol case."

    Quoting works like these (including Sickness Unto Death) is like quoting a character from The Social Network and attributing their opinions to Aaron Sorkin. Kierkegaard's real views were published under his own name, usually one volume released with each new work he put out from an exploratory perspective.

  7. Wow, great video. Glad to see Kierkegarad found true and honest faith. A sad story, but not one without hope, he found the one good answer out their in the cosmos.

  8. Ugh. Not the kind of writing that Im looking for. Is ithis existentialism, or just flat out pessimism? What good does a doom and gloom perspective provide us? I feel like I can skip over this man's work and be better off without having read a word of it. Miss me with your emo point of view.

  9. "A human being is a spirit. But what is a spirit? Spirit is the self. But what is the self? The self is a relation that relates itself to itself or is the relation's relating itself to itself in the relation"
    Yeahp. Philosophy in a nutshell.

Comments are closed.

WP2Social Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com