InfociousHub
——–
Follow us on Instagram👉https://www.instagram.com/infocioushub/
Subscribe to my YouTube channel👉 www.youtube.com/@infocioushub
——–
This content may contain copyrighted materials, which are being used for educational purposes only under the Fair Use Policy and are believed to qualify as “fair use” under Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. Please feel free to contact me or DM me for credit or removal requests (no copyright infringement intended). ©️ All rights and credits reserved to the respective owner(s).
——–
Source
Quantum Delayed Choice Experiment
so… the juice behave different when they are being observe?
❤
DEFINE the word OBSERVE!! And you'll have your answer because they areusing the wrong word.
Bruh Idk 🤷♀️ 😐
There isn't a delayed choice, the wave is a mechanism that allows 'look ahead'. I know it is hard to tell but the particle (sticks tongue in cheek) hangs around the slots doing cross word puzzles until the wave tells it where to go.
And if you have ever done the mathematical version of this with the many paths, you will know that what I said isn't as much of a pee take as it first seems.
Wow you have an eye which can See electrons! The Problem of this Experiment ist that the Observation 8s Not described Well.
DONT GO AND DO MY IDEA IN YOUR. EXPERIMENT AND GIVE ME RECOGNITION. FOR IT . I WILL DRAG YOUR ASS TO COURT. DONT TRY ME B
firstly if it is that THEY GO BACK IN TIME NOW KNOWING BEING OBSERVED ..THATS EASY MAKE THE PHOTONS GO THR A 1WAY MIRROR /in lay mans terms, make it not possible. for them to go back and change, unless they are also not defied by 2dimensional perspective. and can actually. jump back and forth over the experiment. Other option is see if you can fool or trick, by having a hidden camera or device from a angle not even the experimenter. knows, further more hav some one to bring the source from where photons are being there the last minute just before experiment takes place, also have a dummy device measuring tool there to observe how it changes. NO 1 MUST KNOW MUST WHATS THEIRE ROLL OR WHAT THEY DOING IN EXPERIMENT. I CALL THIS THE X37V EXPERIMENT..
Worst explanation ever. The experiment can totally be explained with classical optics, only local interactions and time moving forward. No magic needed unless you leave out the essential details.
The fact is that I believe that the observer is in control of the waves/particles with their thoughts. I guarantee that the government has already proved this. We are in control of our reality. We are just trying to physically examine these particles of matter that we are actually actively manipulating all the time with our thoughts.
I would make another e periment, put the observer after but not start it just let it sit there, and the you find out if it interferes
if light is interfering with light how come you get a so called interference patter with one slit?
It does NOT point to time traveling particles. It points to the truth of reality. It's not a physically reality. The particles aren't physically real. It's just information in a system and nothing in the system asked for which slit when not observed, so the system calculated as if it went through both slits and rendered a reality at the macro level that seems physically real. Only when something in the system asks "which slit" does the system make a decision, causing a 'wave function collapse'.
There is no wave, because there is no physical particle. It's just probabilities in a system. Until the particle hits the backstop or the system is asked "which slit", it all remains just probabilities in the system.
The dobbelt slit wall is an observer.
No time travel or retrocausality involved. contrary to video there IS a better explanation that was figured out some time ago. The delayed choice experiment is a case of only measuring the results that apear to violate causality, sort of. google delayed choice debunked or some such for a better explanation. but basically retrocausality is a missinterpretation of the results.
This is wild! There’s another baffling reality exhibited by nature, namely quantum entanglement. I don’t think anyone has fully explained quantum entanglement, but they know that it is real. Maybe the secret to understanding the mysterious results of the double slit experiment is fundamentally tied to quantum entanglement?
The Wheeler delayed choice experiment SOLVED!!!!
The Wheeler Delayed Choice Experiment Is Only Mysterious If You Make One Wrong Assumption.
The Wheeler delayed choice experiment has puzzled physicists for decades. It appears to show that a photon can “look into the future” and change its behavior based on a measurement decision that hasn’t happened yet. People have invoked consciousness, retrocausality, and parallel universes to explain it.
I think the answer is simpler and it starts by questioning one assumption everyone makes without realizing it.
We assume the photon travels through time the way we do — fired from a source, passing through slits, hitting a detector sequentially, one moment at a time. That assumption is never questioned. It’s just baked into how we describe the experiment.
But what if that assumption is wrong?
Here’s the model. Time equals change. In the classical world things age, decay and move sequentially — that’s what time is. Fundamental particles like photons don’t experience change or decay in that sense. By this definition the quantum domain is effectively timeless relative to us.
If that’s true then the moment a photon is fired from our perspective, it doesn’t travel sequentially through the experiment. It already exists across its entire path simultaneously. It’s already at the slit, already at the detector, already everywhere in its possible paths — all within a single moment of our time.
Now Wheeler’s delayed choice isn’t mysterious at all. The photon didn’t look into the future. There is no future from its perspective. Our decision to measure or not simply determines which aspect of the already-complete timeless photon path we intersect. We see a particle because we’re catching one intersection point between our timed world and its timeless existence. We see wave interference when we don’t measure because we’re seeing the whole pattern that was always already there.
No collapse. No retrocausality. No consciousness required. Just a timeless particle that exists outside our sequential time, caught at one point by our timed observation.
The mystery disappears when you question the assumption.
Rendering reality
I've heard people say that observation itself is an interaction. That I agree, but there seems to be something more. Can someone please explain why the same diffraction pattern occurs whether the detection (interaction with the wave) is at the slit or after the slit. If possible, best to include math and not just handwaving.
Consider the the following thought experiment: We initially place a detector at the slit, and move it closer and closer to the screen until it is at the screen. Should we not see the diffraction pattern go from double to single?
Worst explanation/interpretation of the delayed choice quantum eraser I've ever heard. If you want to understand these concepts go learn on a reputable science education channel such as Science Asylum, or PBS space time
***ATTENTION***
Misinformation/Misinterpretation
The "Delayed Choice Experiment" requires (2) lasers. NOT (1)!
We have a better explanation that doesn’t break causality
I have been firing cats through a pair of slits. They always end up dead. Can someone tell me where I am going wrong. I'm running out of cats.
This proves that the past is created in the present ❤
I create my own reality. period. I don’t care one whit what anyone thinks about me. period. Thank
YOUITHEYTHEMTHOSEUSWE: Dear creators: GREETINGS and HALLUCINATIONS 🔎💥🔍🌸
They are waves not particles. There is single slit interference that looks very much like the dual slit. It’s doesn’t make two bands… ever. The only thing that makes them seem particle-like is that when it hits the screen it only makes an impact on a single electron but they are waves in the em spectrum, oscillating electric and magnetic fields perpendicular to each other.