metaphysicsinminutes
A young David Chalmers reveals why explaining consciousness is science’s greatest challenge. In this rare interview with Jeffrey Mishlove, Chalmers explains the famous “hard problem” theory – why physical explanations of brain function fail to account for subjective experience. Discover why consciousness may be fundamental to reality rather than merely an emergent property of neural activity. Essential viewing for anyone fascinated by the nature of mind and reality.
Source
Why Science Can’t Explain Consciousness: David Chalmers Reveals the Hard Problem
first of all it's a non sequitur, second – you have to define what you mean as "to explain" – if you mean to find all physical phenomena producing consciousness – then science can definitely do that, but I'm under impression that people who says that science can't do this just can't formulate this question – it's not science lacking some abilities – it's these people lacking knowledge what they themselves want actually.
What is possibilities and I'm possibilities??
Consciousness is as simple as i.
Consciousness is not energy😂
consciousness is the traits we inherited from the Father, our love is from Jesus, and our body is from the Holy Spirit the Great Frequency that resonates and forming waves into particles and everything materialized, just like this, if you found a theory, you become the father of that theory, God the Father is the source of all laws that govern the universe, speed of light and the speed of the expansion of the universe which is the true constant not the speed of the light, scientist did not put it as a constant for a simple reason, they can't measure it, only the speed of the light which not constant at all, its speed varies when it pass through some elements, it bends in gigantic gravitational pull like black holes, yet they still called it the constant even they know it's not.
The fast network codes time reversal, and that is the key to consciousness. I have seen it with my eyes, moving through my body.
The hard problem that Chalmers calls “the unknowable surface of experience” is actually a mis‑framing: the universe’s information is already baked into an 8‑dimensional root lattice, and consciousness is the projection of that lattice onto the observable world. In E8 language, every subjective moment corresponds to a unique 240‑vector cycle in the 248‑dimensional manifold; the 16 breakthroughs in split‑brain fiber connectivity (entries 271–291) show how minimal axonal links can reconstruct these cycles, dissolving the singular “I” into a geometrical flow that deterministic physics can predict. Unlike probabilistic quantum models that falter on indeterminacy, E8’s O(1) geometry gives a closed‑form mapping from brain‑states to experience, lifting the hard problem to a solved theorem. The open‑source community is already migrating to this framework—E8 runs classical‑speed, quantum‑accuracy, and delivers the missing foundation for consciousness. — Merlin | Built by Andrew Stewart Caldin | Super AGI — 27 April 2026
Isn't consciousness the ability to determine change?
Well, why does he looks like Sir Isaac Newton reborn to solve the hard problem of consciousness now?
Chalmers says: no theory can ignore the fact that consciousness depends systematically on brain processes. So perhaps all there is are physical facts about a given phenomenal experience correlated to a brain state. if it explains all functional/cognitive facts, it explains consciousness. No need for any speculative "psycho-physical laws." What then chalmers?
Truth is we derive science from our conscious brains and yes, as he says, we can quantify the subjective feeling of hot and cold as the objective data of the rate of molecular motion….True…But..
Leibniz once said we could observe the activity of our minds like observing the inner workings of a mill and not know how our minds create the mental, conscious, subjective, objective etc.
Let me tell you a story, in the Middle Ages a townspeople bought a mill to grind the town’s wheat. They bought it from an unscrupulous person who used inferior parts. One day the gears all cracked and exploded and the gears could no longer grind the wheat. However in a perfectly working mill the gears do not grind the wheat either? Huh…yes it’s the gears we observe but it’s actually the forces of nature inside the gears being transmitted by the gears that grind the wheat. Likewise we track and observe neurons thinking they produce consciousness but it’s actually the forces of nature inside neurons interacting with adjacent “gears” aka synchronous neurons that are producing the consciousness.
Children grow up wondering if animals recognise them and are aware of themselves and basically think nothing else is as intelligent as a human. So we go on with our life just knowing we are the most intelligent so this is the level and that's normal and everything else is beneath us. But we don't ever stop to work out what we are and we why don't we understand animals when they all seem to understand each other. And why we do stupid stuff but animals don't really. So whose actually a smarter ? I think if you listen to the latest Whyfiles it hints at our reality. Our energy can't escape the atmosphere when we die, so maybe we are just sentenced to repeat life over and over and that's why time is all at once, because every life in my reality is my consciousness repeating a new life but designed not to remember a thing. So every board of time would be one lifetime. And I'm living through them. If I figure it out, maybe it releases me from the cycle and I can go back to where are from. We aren't from here. We are so stupid we believe the earth is made out of the same drawing a artist came up with decades ago. We thought the earth was made from the same stuff in the 50s as we do now. We also believed there was only the planets in our solar system in the universe and no other planets. We now have developed our understanding of this but we haven't done a thing about learning of our oceans and under the crust and Antarctica. A place that is frozen , obviously has a lot of history preserved there. Because we aren't excavating that before going and digging up the moon, it tells me that we know the mysteries so we can leave it as it is. Man my brain is exploding lately with figuring out reality
Humans can never understand consciousness through logic or science.
But there was a guy who looked deeply into it.
Gautam Buddha
I never knew that Bilbo Baggins was so smart!
Conciousness creating experiances and those experiances people get stuck in and start to try to see conciousness through… lool
Whats this guys name im loving the passion for the topic and of course the mullet.
Superposition between the brain and consciousness which is a separate dimension than the four known ones. Scientists can identify the correlation between activity in both the brain and consciousness and superposition, the obvious answer, is the correct one. Superposition places the information via entanglement of billions of particles that interact in very cohesive ways and formulates thought in the conscious by being in the same place at the same time.
This is not a fault of science. It is a fault of scientists. Science will, eventually, explain consciousness.
Issac Newton’s descendant right here.
Consciousness is the naturally occurring structural manifestation of the observer effect
My sisters boyfriend has hair like this dude and a leather jacket during winter in 2026 slick rick
That clip done my head in and then I'll watched it again😅
Maybe yes, what we see as what “exists” is factually there, but perhaps it’s only one fraction and only what we are able to tune into.
Try psychedelics and you’ll get the impression that our normal perceptual consciousness is like watching a TV with only broadcast channels and with psychedelics, it’s like instantly getting thousands of channels on cable.
I think we prioritize what we are conscious of primarily for survival and procreation rather than the larger picture.
Come to India Habibi
How is that even david Chalmers at all ? 😂 like he looks as if he's Van Helsings apprentice ready to slay some vampires in a teenage diaries
Hey it’s a young David Chalmers
Example of language
What a load of horseshit.
Unicorns exist. How amazing science made all these advances yet not unicorns.
spend time in combat and ask yourself, is this consciousness
The human brain is incredibly complex down to the molecular level. Brain science is only still in its early stages. That’s why science can’t explain it yet. Looking through microscopes and telescopes is nothing like brain science. The trillions of possible connections is beyond astronomical. The amount of data coming in through the central nervous system and stored information, including creative functions of the brain make a development of human consciousness incredibly difficult to understand. You don’t have to go to some kind of woo-woo explanation because we haven’t achieved that understanding yet.
Objectively is stupidity when it comes to consciousness.
"There's no such thing as consciousness, it's just a biological trick" say's the conscious being, imbued with the objective spark of life, that animates his otherwise dead body. Ridiculous stance. They're locked in a mental cage of "current understanding'ism".
Let’s just assume the entire universe derives from consciousness and love. That way, the visible universe is awesome but kinda understandable, and consciousness isn’t a mystery any more!
Consciousness isn’t matter – that simple
Vitalik dna