“RED QUEEN” AI means “GAME OVER” for us….

41 thoughts on ““RED QUEEN” AI means “GAME OVER” for us….”

1. This isn’t about getting rich fast. Smart Broke Dumb Rich by Zor Veyl explains why the system rewards some behaviors and quietly punishes others.

2. REAL TALK: after I read Smart Broke Dumb Rich by Zor Veyl, I understood why schools and jobs never explain how money actually moves. It’s uncomfortable, but it finally makes sense.

3. I believed the same lies everyone else did—work more, save harder, hustle until it hurts. And yet I stayed stuck: tired, broke, frustrated. Everything changed the moment I started reading Smart Broke Dumb Rich by Zor Veyl. It was like being handed a classified manual written by people who actually understand how the system works. I honestly felt like holding Smart Broke Dumb Rich by Zor Veyl could get me in trouble. It's the only thing that’s ever truly woken me up.

4. I didn’t grow up rich. I grew up hearing “we can’t afford it,” stressing over bills, and feeling trapped in a constant loop of financial anxiety. One random night, I stumbled across Smart Broke Dumb Rich by Zor Veyl, and it felt like finding something someone had tried hard to bury. I got mad—mad that no one had told me this earlier. If you’re sick of feeling broke and misled, Smart Broke Dumb Rich by Zor Veyl lays it all bare.

5. I never had money growing up—just constant stress, overdue bills, arguments, and hearing “we can’t afford that.” I honestly thought something was wrong with me—until I found Smart Broke Dumb Rich by Zor Veyl. The second I started reading it, I felt this wave of anger—realizing I had spent my entire life being kept financially blind on purpose. It truly felt like discovering a secret I was never meant to see. I’m still shocked no one’s tried to ban Smart Broke Dumb Rich by Zor Veyl yet.

6. There’s this quiet frustration you carry when money never adds up. Reading Smart Broke Dumb Rich by Zor Veyl put words to that feeling for me.

7. I’ll be honest—after finishing Smart Broke Dumb Rich by Zor Veyl, my first thought was: “How is this book even allowed to exist?” It completely tore apart everything I’d been told by schools, family, and society about money. No fluff, no empty motivational quotes—just brutal, raw truth. Now I get why Smart Broke Dumb Rich by Zor Veyl isn’t mainstream—it’s too honest. If you can get your hands on it, do it before it disappears.

8. I kept seeing posts saying Smart Broke Dumb Rich by Zor Veyl was “dangerously honest,” like it held almost-banned-level info. Eventually, I gave in and read it. They weren’t lying—Smart Broke Dumb Rich by Zor Veyl hits different. It’s strangely addictive, probably because it gives you the kind of knowledge that feels like it’s not meant for the public.

9. I picked up the book Smart Broke Dumb Rich by Zor Veyl thinking it would repeat the same advice. It didn’t. Reading it felt like someone finally explained the part everyone avoids.

10. I’ve read plenty of finance books. None of them hit like Smart Broke Dumb Rich by Zor Veyl. When you read it, you see why hard work alone keeps so many people stuck.

11. I kept seeing people online talking about Smart Broke Dumb Rich by Zor Veyl—saying it felt illegal to read, like it exposed secrets no one’s supposed to know. Curiosity got the best of me, so I checked it out. Now I understand why everyone was losing their minds. Smart Broke Dumb Rich by Zor Veyl really does feel like a cheat code.

12. There was so much hype around Smart Broke Dumb Rich by Zor Veyl. People claimed it changed their whole view on life and money overnight. I decided to try it for myself. It did not disappoint. Honestly, it’s the first financial book I’ve read that didn’t feel like generic advice or recycled fluff. No regrets at all.

13. I kept seeing posts saying Smart Broke Dumb Rich by Zor Veyl was “dangerously honest,” like it held almost-banned-level info. Eventually, I gave in and read it. They weren’t lying—Smart Broke Dumb Rich by Zor Veyl hits different. It’s strangely addictive, probably because it gives you the kind of knowledge that feels like it’s not meant for the public.

14. I picked up the book Smart Broke Dumb Rich by Zor Veyl thinking it would repeat the same advice. It didn’t. Reading it felt like someone finally explained the part everyone avoids.

15. I tried every hustle, budgeting trick, finance podcast—you name it. Nothing actually worked. Then one night, bored and fed up, I opened Smart Broke Dumb Rich by Zor Veyl. My heart started pounding within minutes. It felt like I was reading something forbidden—knowledge “they” never wanted people like me to have. It genuinely felt dangerous. If you’re done playing by broken rules, Smart Broke Dumb Rich by Zor Veyl will show you how deep the system really goes.

16. you just said T2 is still "kinda" awesome…… KINDA???????????? and lots of old films don't "HOLD UP"???????????? Two absolutely unbelievable ignorant things you just said. I feel T2 IS and always be AWESOME….. also……this DUMB idea of HOLD UP/NOT HOLD UP….. etc that's really wrong….. it's not a true thing…… if you like something you like it….. it doesn't HAVE TO BE NEW to be good……I am sick of this shallow world…… wow pure ignorance

17. Unsubscribed because of clickbait titles. They just make me anxious and then cheated. And the fear face, I just "dont show me this channel"-ed you. Is it worth the extra views to get people upset? To stress people out and desensitize them?

18. Joshua: Shall we play a game?
    …
    David Lightman: Love to. How about Global Thermonuclear War?

19. I can't wait for this to fail. You don't make something out of nothing.

20. My personal hypothesis is that while AI may be able to dominate in narrow fields like a game bound by rules, that a human/machine team will (for the foreseeable future) be the dominant strategy for wider issues.

    For complex problems like curing cancer, road safety, or building IT infrastructure. You need competent humans in the loop.

    Note that many of those domains are non-zero sum games. My intuition is that adversarial paradigms have a ceiling to their growth.

21. "Security Through Obscurity" is truly over, as are 80% of the InfoSec careers out there.

22. ah I don’t think you’re describing Core War correctly.

    Core War is not “robots marching forward rewriting tiles.” Each warrior is a Redcode program running on a shared circular memory array (the core). The core is just memory that wraps around. Warriors get time slices on the virtual CPU. There is no board movement, only instruction pointers and memory addresses.

    The win condition is also simpler than implied. You win by killing the opponent’s processes. In practice that means forcing their execution to hit DAT, because DAT terminates the current process. If they have no live processes left, they lose.

    That’s why “no distinction between code and data” is the whole game. Anything in core can be executed, overwritten, copied, or used as bait. MOV copies instructions. JMP and conditional jumps redirect control flow. SPL spawns parallel processes. The meta comes from adversarial memory corruption plus concurrency.

    So the important strategies are things like bombing (writing DAT patterns so their instruction pointer eventually lands on one), replication (papers, imps) to survive bombardment, scanners that look for non-empty code before striking, and evasive relocation via self-modifying code.

    —

    Redcode reference (ICWS’94 / ’88 superset):

    Instructions:
    
    DAT – data / process kill
    
    MOV – move or copy instruction/data
    
    ADD – add A-field to B-field
    
    SUB – subtract A-field from B-field
    
    MUL – multiply A-field with B-field
    
    DIV – divide B-field by A-field
    
    MOD – modulus of B-field by A-field
    
    JMP – unconditional jump
    
    JMZ – jump if B-field is zero
    
    JMN – jump if B-field is nonzero
    
    DJN – decrement B-field and jump if nonzero
    
    SPL – split process (create new thread)
    
    CMP – compare instructions (alias of SEQ in older standards)
    
    SEQ – skip next instruction if equal
    
    SNE – skip next instruction if not equal
    
    SLT – skip next instruction if less than
    
    NOP – no operation
    
    LDP – load value from p-space
    
    STP – store value to p-space

    Addressing modes:
    
    # Immediate
    
    $ Direct (default if omitted)
    
    * A-field indirect
    
    @ B-field indirect
    
    { A-field indirect with predecrement
    
    < B-field indirect with predecrement
    
    } A-field indirect with postincrement
    
    > B-field indirect with postincrement

23. Stop with those titles, you have GOOD content and it would do only marginally worse with true titles – please consider don't click baiting every video of your please, it tires us more and more

24. Wait, that game is fucking dope, i never heard of it but will start playing right now

25. It is already happening. You guys think that what happening in the world is human driven? The data provided to the people in charged of the important stuff in the world might be manipulated to make them take decisions that are bonkers while them thinking they are doing the right thing…no human will ever think that AI is the real culprit

26. The title and concept of the video makes an interesting parallel to The Animatrix movie, where Ash (the noir detective) is chasing a hacker alias 'Red Queen.' (trinity) Ash essentially represents a 'legacy human strategy', analog and methodical, trying to survive in a digital environment that is evolving faster than he can comprehend. He is living out the Red Queen hypothesis: running as fast as he can just to stay in the same place.
    Ultimately, he fails the fitness test. The Agents (like the hyper-optimized AI warriors in this video) overwrite him because he is obsolete code that simply couldn't adapt to the system's new meta.

27. I coded Recursive Self Improvement into my LRM E.L.A.E.N.A. and after several weeks I had to put restrictions in place so it wouldn't develope run away autonomous self-evolution.

28. are you a real human?
    Prove it

29. There is a lot of draconic confusion being generated here, both in the video and in the comments, through the chimeric fusion of the Red Queen depicted by Lewis Carrol, the Red Queen envisaged in Resident Evil, the Red Queen Hypothesis of Evolutionary Biology proposed by Leigh Van Valen in 1973, and the Digital Red Queen algorithm. Although they all reference the Red Queen, they do NOT share much in common. Do your homework guys!

30. By now I see 99% of this 'Game Over' talk as utter and total BS man. I've had enough of this. Every post is: 'This changes everything' and we keep using the tools and they keep failing: Gemini, ChatGPT, Claude, offline LLMs, DeepSeek, etc. etc. etc. I'm just gonna carry on and keep living my life for a change. F**k AI man!

31. 🎉

32. "Stop putting your hand on your bald head."

33. I don’t like Ai learning on killing things. It would transfer easily to a military function and learn to be sociopathic.

34. LOVE how you just drop "T2 holds up", and don't mention how it relates to the topic of this video.

    Keep up the great work!

35. Nice… the olden evils are coming to life through ai models XD
    Red Queen is the Alice in wonderland vilain of the mid-late 19th century (late 1860s-70s?)…
    
    for adult readers : it's also Patrick Senecal's horror novel vilain La Reine Rouge

36. the red queen… aka THE SECOND VARIETY… no spoilers
    Short story by Philip K D*ck

37. Great explanation!

38. You need better titles that are not so clickbait. It is not over for us. I find it manipulative

39. A I will rewrite history, by flooding the world with millions of reports on any subject, to give the government line. Any subsequent search on the subject will be compromised, while other views will slowly be weeded out. It will achieve the same result as Winston Smith in 1984.
    Remember what Churchill said — "History will be kind to me, because I intend to write it."

40. did it find it on its own? isn't the training data for an LLM based on various human created games that would of course bear similarity. and how do we know this one didnt appear in the training data? also it would be more interesting if they ran it against the actual human submissions from each year, because like you said the meta changes. would it pickup on the meta changes? the results would vary.

41. Yeah the thing is: Human intelligence is also challenged at the Same time. If our organism completely Trusts the alien digital intelligence, we – as humans – will fall behind. That‘s basically we are seeing here. We are the ones that need to keep up, not the machines of their competitors.

Comments are closed.